Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- stuporman
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,042
- And1: 21,057
- Joined: Nov 27, 2005
- Location: optimistic skeptical realist
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
The media has noted how the Brunson signing isn't getting as much fanfare than I guess they think should be getting it while also simultaneously saying calm down Knicks fans it's only Brunson not LeBron.
Is it possible that Knick fans are tired of being told how they feel about what the team does? Getting told stories to reinforce the narrative the media wants that loves an angry Knicks fan clicks things so it's keeps them angry.
Awaken from the matrix
Is it possible that Knick fans are tired of being told how they feel about what the team does? Getting told stories to reinforce the narrative the media wants that loves an angry Knicks fan clicks things so it's keeps them angry.
Awaken from the matrix
If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
?
Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
?Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- rickxdel
- Senior
- Posts: 686
- And1: 773
- Joined: May 29, 2021
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
TheDavinciCHODE wrote:I'll just say what I've been sayin all along.
I like Brunson as a player. He's going to help this team a lot for sure. I don't mind paying that much, and it's probably not even an overpay in the modern NBA.
However, if this FO spent the last 3 seasons' worth of moves just to bring in Brunson while at the same time hurting our youth movement and losing the margins I'm going to be disappointed.
I think we can win ~45ish games if things break right for us. That's not what I want from this team though.
I really hope we get rid of randle this season. I just don't see a top 3 of Randle/Brunson/RJ getting us anywhere near where we want to go.
In the meantime, looking forward to see what Brunson can do with the keys to an offense.
Hopefully they're smart enough to trade Randle at any stretch where he is playing well and raising back his value
FREE PALESTINE
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- dakomish23
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 58,784
- And1: 48,762
- Joined: Sep 22, 2013
- Location: Empire State
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
#FreeJimmit
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- dakomish23
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 58,784
- And1: 48,762
- Joined: Sep 22, 2013
- Location: Empire State
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Was listening to the KFTV show and I think it was JD who kept bringing up only one ball. RJ gonna have the ball in his hands a lot. Obviously Brunson.
So I’m wondering if the Knicks should be starting Obi & Grimes. Throw in Mitch and you have 3 guys out there who play off people and might max out the output from Brunson RJ. Plus that team could play fast.
Put Randle and Fournier on the bench with Cam Hart IQ.
Idk it seems like both 5 man units would be better fits.
So I’m wondering if the Knicks should be starting Obi & Grimes. Throw in Mitch and you have 3 guys out there who play off people and might max out the output from Brunson RJ. Plus that team could play fast.
Put Randle and Fournier on the bench with Cam Hart IQ.
Idk it seems like both 5 man units would be better fits.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
#FreeJimmit
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
Oscirus
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,530
- And1: 9,536
- Joined: Dec 09, 2011
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
stuporman wrote:The media has noted how the Brunson signing isn't getting as much fanfare than I guess they think should be getting it while also simultaneously saying calm down Knicks fans it's only Brunson not LeBron.
Is it possible that Knick fans are tired of being told how they feel about what the team does? Getting told stories to reinforce the narrative the media wants that loves an angry Knicks fan clicks things so it's keeps them angry.
Awaken from the matrix
I just saw some espn show that called this a bad signing merely cuz the knicks did it. Regardless of what we do it'll be seen as bad.
;t=180s
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- Bob Ross
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,127
- And1: 7,517
- Joined: Nov 28, 2011
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Oscirus wrote:stuporman wrote:The media has noted how the Brunson signing isn't getting as much fanfare than I guess they think should be getting it while also simultaneously saying calm down Knicks fans it's only Brunson not LeBron.
Is it possible that Knick fans are tired of being told how they feel about what the team does? Getting told stories to reinforce the narrative the media wants that loves an angry Knicks fan clicks things so it's keeps them angry.
Awaken from the matrix
I just saw some espn show that called this a bad signing merely cuz the knicks did it. Regardless of what we do it'll be seen as bad.
;t=180s
I heard that as well. They considered a good value contract and an asset for basically any team but the Knicks. Wtf
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
- Jstock12
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,058
- And1: 17,879
- Joined: Jun 24, 2012
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
Chanel Bomber wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:This is a move in the right direction, young PG with advanced stats that say he can do a lot more.
Legit tough guy too. He's scrappy.
And not in a fake-tough/unhinged Reggie Bullock, Julius Randle against the Hawks kind of a way.
The Knicks version of Kyle Lowry
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
HopelessKnick
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,293
- And1: 3,002
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
This is the kind of move you make when you have a first option in place.
The positives of Brunson are that he has solid efficiency on offense and does not turn the ball over. He has also proved that he can be efficient:
a) without Luca
b) in the playoffs
I read some stats months ago that he is the best or among the best midrange shooters in the game and his 3-point shot is also rock solid. He has strong footwork and and a good floater. So overall on offense he is indeed pretty good.--not elite like Steph, Lillard etc. but still pretty good.
Negatives:
Defense---you'd think that he is tough and at least an above average defender, but he really isn't.
Athleticism---he is neither quick nor explosive, somewhat limiting him. I noticed during the playoffs that he had to work extremely hard for his shot.
Overall I'd say he is worth 4years/90mill. at max. so the Knicks overpaid. I think realistically he could average 22/8 throughout the season.
Overall grade: C (just for the fact that the Knicks haven't had a good, healthy starting calibur PG for ages).
The positives of Brunson are that he has solid efficiency on offense and does not turn the ball over. He has also proved that he can be efficient:
a) without Luca
b) in the playoffs
I read some stats months ago that he is the best or among the best midrange shooters in the game and his 3-point shot is also rock solid. He has strong footwork and and a good floater. So overall on offense he is indeed pretty good.--not elite like Steph, Lillard etc. but still pretty good.
Negatives:
Defense---you'd think that he is tough and at least an above average defender, but he really isn't.
Athleticism---he is neither quick nor explosive, somewhat limiting him. I noticed during the playoffs that he had to work extremely hard for his shot.
Overall I'd say he is worth 4years/90mill. at max. so the Knicks overpaid. I think realistically he could average 22/8 throughout the season.
Overall grade: C (just for the fact that the Knicks haven't had a good, healthy starting calibur PG for ages).
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
-
HopelessKnick
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,293
- And1: 3,002
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
Jstock12 wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:This is a move in the right direction, young PG with advanced stats that say he can do a lot more.
Legit tough guy too. He's scrappy.
And not in a fake-tough/unhinged Reggie Bullock, Julius Randle against the Hawks kind of a way.
The Knicks version of Kyle Lowry
Actually they do not have that much in common (size aside). Lowry in his younger years was quicker and more explosive but played also way more out of control. He was a worse shooter than Brunson as well. However Lowry was much better defensively.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
- Jstock12
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,058
- And1: 17,879
- Joined: Jun 24, 2012
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
HopelessKnick wrote:Jstock12 wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Legit tough guy too. He's scrappy.
And not in a fake-tough/unhinged Reggie Bullock, Julius Randle against the Hawks kind of a way.
The Knicks version of Kyle Lowry
Actually they do not have that much in common (size aside). Lowry in his younger years was quicker and more explosive but played also way more out of control. He was a worse shooter than Brunson as well. However Lowry was much better defensively.
Yeah I was more referring to their mentality I guess. Both have tough mindsets.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
-
HopelessKnick
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,293
- And1: 3,002
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
Jstock12 wrote:HopelessKnick wrote:Jstock12 wrote:
The Knicks version of Kyle Lowry
Actually they do not have that much in common (size aside). Lowry in his younger years was quicker and more explosive but played also way more out of control. He was a worse shooter than Brunson as well. However Lowry was much better defensively.
Yeah I was more referring to their mentality I guess. Both have tough mindsets.
Ah ok understood.
Don't get me wrong, I do like Brunson as a player and he seems like the unafraid, unintimidated type of player that won't crumble under pressure. Whether it is the right move, price at the right time remains to be seen.
Overall having a true, capable starting caliber PG that is a low turnover guy, solid playmaker and good shooter is very positive. He is also offensively a good fit next to Rose as he is accustomed to playing off ball as well.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
-
HarthorneWingo
- RealGM
- Posts: 97,546
- And1: 62,686
- Joined: May 16, 2005
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
Jstock12 wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:This is a move in the right direction, young PG with advanced stats that say he can do a lot more.
Legit tough guy too. He's scrappy.
And not in a fake-tough/unhinged Reggie Bullock, Julius Randle against the Hawks kind of a way.
The Knicks version of Kyle Lowry
Villanova
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
knicks94
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,149
- And1: 4,664
- Joined: Apr 01, 2010
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Damn, Brunson must have read the Jerome James/Eddy Curry playbook on how to steal money from Dolan.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
HopelessKnick
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,293
- And1: 3,002
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
knicks94 wrote:Damn, Brunson must have read the Jerome James/Eddy Curry playbook on how to steal money from Dolan.
I dislike Leon Rose and am no fan of this FO at all and fully agree that we overpaid. That being said the comparison to Jerome James is completely ridiculous. Curry had a lot of talent but was never interested in playing basketball unfortunately. Both those scenarios are completely different.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
bearadonisdna
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,757
- And1: 5,394
- Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Dallas board or our board not even talking about tampering ,
It’s just the GB , those dude got old man at clouds syndrome , they kinda washed up on direction of narratives.
Things were getting better but they reverted back quick , next thing you know shaq and Hakeem are gonna be better than wilt and bill Russ again and it ain’t even close
It’s just the GB , those dude got old man at clouds syndrome , they kinda washed up on direction of narratives.
Things were getting better but they reverted back quick , next thing you know shaq and Hakeem are gonna be better than wilt and bill Russ again and it ain’t even close
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- Reign23
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,748
- And1: 12,573
- Joined: Dec 29, 2014
- Location: Germany.
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
I think Brunson is a top 6-7 value PG if you consider a)money b)skill c)age.
formerly known as knickst4pe
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
knicks94
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,149
- And1: 4,664
- Joined: Apr 01, 2010
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
The comparison isn't to James/Curry and Brunson as players, but to how the Knicks seem to quickly open up their wallets whenever a player has a career year. I'm not saying that Brunson cannot be a productive player, but I am not fully convinced that this move will workout in the long run based on the track record of how this front office has done business for the past 20 years.HopelessKnick wrote:knicks94 wrote:Damn, Brunson must have read the Jerome James/Eddy Curry playbook on how to steal money from Dolan.
I dislike Leon Rose and am no fan of this FO at all and fully agree that we overpaid. That being said the comparison to Jerome James is completely ridiculous. Curry had a lot of talent but was never interested in playing basketball unfortunately. Both those scenarios are completely different.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 82,047
- And1: 95,982
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Brunson best Knick PG under the age of 30 since ?

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
Adelheid
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,746
- And1: 7,965
- Joined: Jul 10, 2014
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
HopelessKnick
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,293
- And1: 3,002
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
knicks94 wrote:The comparison isn't to James/Curry and Brunson as players, but to how the Knicks seem to quickly open up their wallets whenever a player has a career year. I'm not saying that Brunson cannot be a productive player, but I am not fully convinced that this move will workout in the long run based on the track record of how this front office has done business for the past 20 years.HopelessKnick wrote:knicks94 wrote:Damn, Brunson must have read the Jerome James/Eddy Curry playbook on how to steal money from Dolan.
I dislike Leon Rose and am no fan of this FO at all and fully agree that we overpaid. That being said the comparison to Jerome James is completely ridiculous. Curry had a lot of talent but was never interested in playing basketball unfortunately. Both those scenarios are completely different.
I understand this sentiment generally and I don't really endorse the signing. I do however think that in regards to Brunson some of the stuff that he provides are clearly not once-in-a-career-typ-outliers. He has always been rather efficient shooting and scoring the ball. He has always took care of the ball. He has improved his game over 4 years steadily and has a lot of skills and a good head on his sholders.
I'm with you generally that Knick FO has been terrible, but I'm pretty sure that the odds of Brunson dissapointing (in what he provides on the court) is generally low. Still overpaid some but it genuinely seems that the Knicks' organizational reputation is so terrible and bad that signing anything more than a 2nd/3rd option seems impossible. I personally would have gone the tanking route for a couple top 5 draft picks, just to be clear , but Brunson itself will be a solid player. He really is a good player, it is not some flukish bull run. He was even able to improve his output throughout the playoffs, which is actually rare, even for better players.











