TheLand13 wrote:NBA4Lyfe wrote:TheLand13 wrote:
And how well did those 50 win seasons go for Harden? How did he perform when he was tasked with taking on that warriors team after losing Paul to injury? It’s not a matter of ring counting. There was a clear flaw in hardens play style that hindered your ability to win with him.
And dirk at least managed to make the NBA finals before 2011. We had something to at least go off of. There’s nothing to go off of with Harden.
Not to mention, I went on to explain why Harden is an incredibly flawed player without even mentioning rings. Is there a reason you’re ignoring that?
Luka up this point has just been as good as 2017 harden nowhere as good as prime harden. He is overrated, as his on/off and advanced stats outside of bpm are average
Well considering how Luka is only in his fourth year of basketball and 23 years old, I wouldn't expect him to be at Harden's level in his prime.
But I will say this: Luka in his fourth season took his team to the WCF without any all star caliber player on his team. Harden on the other hand in his entire career has not come close to accomplishing something like that.
If anything, Harden is the massively overrated one. He's got an MVP on his resume that he doesn't deserve, multiple instances of failed basketball and dicking his team over, extremely exploitable holes in his game (granted, so does Luka, but you'd expect that at his age), and no redeemable qualities in the meantime.
Harden literally did the same thing in 2015 carrying a team to the WCF where his 2nd best player was Trevor Ariza. He did have Dwight Howard on his roster; however, this was the version of Dwight who was struggling with post back surgery complications, only played 40 games, and looked like crap.