KnixtapeH20 wrote:bearadonisdna wrote:KnixtapeH20 wrote:LOL this coming from a **** who ain't even watch the game bro shut the **** up
U sound so dumb
Saw the 1st six minutes.
Didn’t know it was the bulk of mitchs contributions.
So dude chill, you out here defending 4 points 2 Rebs 5 fouls .
It’s business as usual for your boy Mitch, basically 4 on 5,
His backup had to play 3x the minutes.
Mitch should be giving Hart some his paycheck for yesterdays game .
Stop with mediocrity condoning .
Nobody thinks what Mitch did yesterday was ok but You.
U wanna give some insight on what exactly would be acceptable for Mitch in your eyes? Bc all u do is look at the stat sheet, particularly points n rebounds.
Defense means nothing I guess that's why u love Isiah bc he can't defend anyone and gets abused on the boards. His strength is shooting n passing not defense n rebounding
No I don’t only use stat sheet .
Since I only saw a part of the game I can’t go into detail
But the discrepancy in production speaks for itself .
To me Mitch’s contributions on defense have been vastly overrated as he is a one dimensional defender (rim protector )
while last season showed the defense performed better with him off the floors, which is unheard of for a supposed ‘defensive’ anchor.
The bar wasnt particularly high for Mitch back then.
What’s serviceable for a 16M per year player opens up a bunch of semantics. Sorry , I know words like that aren’t cool in the ‘hood’
Last night for example , he was a -7.
Mitch can score well in metrics because he is efficient on low volume .
But the team metrics have not been released yet , I would like to see him have
1. Positive +\- as a starter ( for at least once in his career)
2. Improve the defense in his minutes
Those are my main wants for contributions to actually be a positive on court influence on the team .






























