SpreeS wrote:Dutchball97 wrote:The Lazy Potato wrote:About Luka Doncic it feels like we giving him too much credit for a guy who doesn't give effort and energy on defense, he is the new James Harden for me. I will never give credit to guys who focus only on their individual stats. We should reward someone who his team is actually one of the top. Winning should matter the most on this award, this is the right way to me. If you don't want to give it to Giannis because his team is great even without him that's fine. But still the MVP trophy should go to someone that his team is one of the very best. We should rewarding winning culture above everything.
Funny enough I think that's just about the worst way to look at it. It's exactly how a top 15 player like Booker was suddenly 4th in MVP voting last year. Why base an individual award around team record? Winning culture gets rewarded by winning already, the MVP should be used to celebrate individual excellence. It's almost like you're implying Luka is hunting stats and should have a better record, while the Mavs are a perfectly fine 6-4 with a pretty mediocre roster outside of Luka.
Mediocre roster???
DAL w/o Doncic 111min +7.1 netrtg
GSW w/o Curry 182min -22.6 netrtg
DEN w/o Jokic 158min -15.8 netrtg
How do you call Warriors or Denver roster? Moody could be 5th best player after Curry/Green/Looney/Wiggs. I mean "best" is less negative than the rest.
I'm completely at a loss as to how you read the Dallas roster being mediocre meaning that other teams can't be as bad or worse.



















