JBSouthpaw wrote:Fultz and Cole: 32 pts, 12 reb, 12 ast vs. 3 TO in 61 minutes.
Looked pretty good against Poole and Divencenzo.
Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass
JBSouthpaw wrote:Fultz and Cole: 32 pts, 12 reb, 12 ast vs. 3 TO in 61 minutes.
IllMagic04 wrote:I think that's absolutely insane. Lillard is a superstar. If there is a senerio where you could pair Franz, Paolo and Dam on the same team ( and there isn't) you trade anything on the roster needed to make that happen. Suggs, Fultz, Bol, Cole, WCjr, multiple picks. Whatever. You not just gonna draft the next Dam Lillard. I mean you might but its unlikely. But obviously this is fantasy. In the real worl Portland is not trading Dam. And if they were it would require Franz in the deal. Franz, Bol, Suggs, Wcjr and a crap load of picks would be the deal in real life. Portland might say no deal to even thatbasketballRob wrote:No thanks to Lillard. He's not a good defender and a bad fit with Paolo and Franz. Boston is built around forwards.zaymon wrote:
GSW were build around guards, we are being built around forwards. Outside all of that we have exactly someone like Iguodala just in the backcourt. Its Suggs. Athletic, strong, good passer for a combo guard and suspect shooter.
We need a shooter and perimeter creator. Lillard contract doesnt hurt us much becouse Franz and Paolo are on rookie deals.
I would much rather have Lillard than dead salary of Bamba, Isaac, Fultz.
I don't want to be like Portland.
Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my SM-G970U using RealGM mobile app
AaronB wrote:IllMagic04 wrote:I think that's absolutely insane. Lillard is a superstar. If there is a senerio where you could pair Franz, Paolo and Dam on the same team ( and there isn't) you trade anything on the roster needed to make that happen. Suggs, Fultz, Bol, Cole, WCjr, multiple picks. Whatever. You not just gonna draft the next Dam Lillard. I mean you might but its unlikely. But obviously this is fantasy. In the real worl Portland is not trading Dam. And if they were it would require Franz in the deal. Franz, Bol, Suggs, Wcjr and a crap load of picks would be the deal in real life. Portland might say no deal to even thatbasketballRob wrote:No thanks to Lillard. He's not a good defender and a bad fit with Paolo and Franz. Boston is built around forwards.
I don't want to be like Portland.
Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my SM-G970U using RealGM mobile app
Repeat after me:
Better Players =/= more wins
Once you have enough really good players, you surround them with good complimentary players.
The Magic have enough really good players.
I like the team the Magic have.
Def Swami wrote:Enjoyed how aggressive Wagner was in the 2nd quarter with the bench unit. We need that consistently with Banchero on the bench.
That's not correct. You don't need a bunch of good players. You need superstars surounded with good complimentary pieces. The hard part of that equation is getting the superstar. Dam is a superstar. The idea that you wouldn't do a trade to get him that does not include Paolo or Franz is insane.AaronB wrote:IllMagic04 wrote:I think that's absolutely insane. Lillard is a superstar. If there is a senerio where you could pair Franz, Paolo and Dam on the same team ( and there isn't) you trade anything on the roster needed to make that happen. Suggs, Fultz, Bol, Cole, WCjr, multiple picks. Whatever. You not just gonna draft the next Dam Lillard. I mean you might but its unlikely. But obviously this is fantasy. In the real worl Portland is not trading Dam. And if they were it would require Franz in the deal. Franz, Bol, Suggs, Wcjr and a crap load of picks would be the deal in real life. Portland might say no deal to even thatbasketballRob wrote:No thanks to Lillard. He's not a good defender and a bad fit with Paolo and Franz. Boston is built around forwards.
I don't want to be like Portland.
Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my SM-G970U using RealGM mobile app
Repeat after me:
Better Players =/= more wins
Once you have enough really good players, you surround them with good complimentary players.
The Magic have enough really good players.
I like the team the Magic have.
Yes it did. Mosley continues to develop talent and construct rotations at an elite coaching level. I want to see some growth with in-game tactics but he is really doing a hell of a job.thelead wrote:Def Swami wrote:Enjoyed how aggressive Wagner was in the 2nd quarter with the bench unit. We need that consistently with Banchero on the bench.
I loved Banchero taking the lead with the starters and Franz/Suggs being the focus with the second unit. That rotation looks pretty damn good.
IllMagic04 wrote:That's not correct. You don't need a bunch of good players. You need superstars surounded with good complimentary pieces. The hard part of that equation is getting the superstar. Dam is a superstar. The idea that you wouldn't do a trade to get him that does not include Paolo or Franz is insane.AaronB wrote:IllMagic04 wrote:I think that's absolutely insane. Lillard is a superstar. If there is a senerio where you could pair Franz, Paolo and Dam on the same team ( and there isn't) you trade anything on the roster needed to make that happen. Suggs, Fultz, Bol, Cole, WCjr, multiple picks. Whatever. You not just gonna draft the next Dam Lillard. I mean you might but its unlikely. But obviously this is fantasy. In the real worl Portland is not trading Dam. And if they were it would require Franz in the deal. Franz, Bol, Suggs, Wcjr and a crap load of picks would be the deal in real life. Portland might say no deal to even that
Sent from my SM-G970U using RealGM mobile app
Repeat after me:
Better Players =/= more wins
Once you have enough really good players, you surround them with good complimentary players.
The Magic have enough really good players.
I like the team the Magic have.
Sent from my SM-G970U using RealGM mobile app
He looks like he's lost a little to me and is still owed $300M. I'd take Kyrie over him and he's a free agent .IllMagic04 wrote:That's not correct. You don't need a bunch of good players. You need superstars surounded with good complimentary pieces. The hard part of that equation is getting the superstar. Dam is a superstar. The idea that you wouldn't do a trade to get him that does not include Paolo or Franz is insane.AaronB wrote:IllMagic04 wrote:I think that's absolutely insane. Lillard is a superstar. If there is a senerio where you could pair Franz, Paolo and Dam on the same team ( and there isn't) you trade anything on the roster needed to make that happen. Suggs, Fultz, Bol, Cole, WCjr, multiple picks. Whatever. You not just gonna draft the next Dam Lillard. I mean you might but its unlikely. But obviously this is fantasy. In the real worl Portland is not trading Dam. And if they were it would require Franz in the deal. Franz, Bol, Suggs, Wcjr and a crap load of picks would be the deal in real life. Portland might say no deal to even that
Sent from my SM-G970U using RealGM mobile app
Repeat after me:
Better Players =/= more wins
Once you have enough really good players, you surround them with good complimentary players.
The Magic have enough really good players.
I like the team the Magic have.
Sent from my SM-G970U using RealGM mobile app
AaronB wrote:IllMagic04 wrote:That's not correct. You don't need a bunch of good players. You need superstars surounded with good complimentary pieces. The hard part of that equation is getting the superstar. Dam is a superstar. The idea that you wouldn't do a trade to get him that does not include Paolo or Franz is insane.AaronB wrote:
Repeat after me:
Better Players =/= more wins
Once you have enough really good players, you surround them with good complimentary players.
The Magic have enough really good players.
I like the team the Magic have.
Sent from my SM-G970U using RealGM mobile app
Then we will agree to disagree.
I think that getting an end-of-career (yet still amazing) PG who pounds the rock is not the kind of player that makes the Magic better.
I like Lillard. He has had a great career and has had moments of magnificence that few can rival.
I think that the deferring and very tough Fultz is a better match for Paolo and Franz, even though Fultz is not nearly the player that Dame is.
I think that both Paolo and Franz have the chance to be special and they need to be fed, not have them watch Dame getting fed.
IllMagic04 wrote:That's not correct. You don't need a bunch of good players. You need superstars surounded with good complimentary pieces. The hard part of that equation is getting the superstar. Dam is a superstar. The idea that you wouldn't do a trade to get him that does not include Paolo or Franz is insane.AaronB wrote:IllMagic04 wrote:I think that's absolutely insane. Lillard is a superstar. If there is a senerio where you could pair Franz, Paolo and Dam on the same team ( and there isn't) you trade anything on the roster needed to make that happen. Suggs, Fultz, Bol, Cole, WCjr, multiple picks. Whatever. You not just gonna draft the next Dam Lillard. I mean you might but its unlikely. But obviously this is fantasy. In the real worl Portland is not trading Dam. And if they were it would require Franz in the deal. Franz, Bol, Suggs, Wcjr and a crap load of picks would be the deal in real life. Portland might say no deal to even that
Sent from my SM-G970U using RealGM mobile app
Repeat after me:
Better Players =/= more wins
Once you have enough really good players, you surround them with good complimentary players.
The Magic have enough really good players.
I like the team the Magic have.
Sent from my SM-G970U using RealGM mobile app