PhilBlackson wrote:douggood wrote:PhilBlackson wrote:No idea why so many people are interested in a deal involving OG for Cam Johnson…for FVV sure but for OG, that’s underwhelming and I’d much rather target any NOP, POR or OKC as trade partners.
As Lowe reported the interest is near league wide, surely can do better than needing to pay up for a not so young, fairly one dimensional Cam Johnson.
would you rather
Fournier and 3 protected picks (or 2+1 etc)
or cam and 2 unprotected picks. (or 1+1 etc)
it comes down to offers available.
…and what makes you think those are the only deals available when it’s already widely reported that there’s interest league wide?! lol
Those (plus MEM) are only the teams that have been leaked SO FAR (you’re also excluding POR who went after him in the off-season and whom Dame is still apparently applying pressure to be more competitive) ie/ no one was even talking about CLE yet Mitchell ended up there…not NYK, TOR or any other team that was reported at the time.
There is nothing that says those are our only offers, quite the contrary.
i am not saying they are the only offers, but there will be pluses and minuses to each. you want extra picks, they will be protected, want less you can get unprotected, eat bad contracts etc.
my point is it may be that cam is better than getting another protected pick or bad salary.
cam doesnt have to be here long term, its about maximizing return/value right now.
we know the market is equivalent to dejonte murry.
3 picks (charlotte lotto protected that becomes 2nds)
and had to take gallo and release him (negative asset)
1 swap
































