bwgood77 wrote:BobbieL wrote:Ghost of Kleine wrote:So I wonder what they'd be getting back? Maybe Lowry and Robinson? IF they do this, They'd absolutely not have any cap space whatsoever to possibly sign Irving! So IF this premise would happen, then wouldn't Irving be more likely to resign with Dallas??
I hope the lakers do that deal - Lowry has been horrible
They should want Chris Paul more than Lowry
I think this is coming from the Heat more than Laker. Pincus working for Riles
I don't understand what you guys are talking about here. Why would the Lakers get anything back of Westbrook is bought out? Isn't this tweet under the premise that Westbrook would go to Utah for picks, Conley and Beasley and Utah would by Russ out?
Nah! I believe that this premise is just another example (completely separate from) of what the Flakers might look to use Westbrick's expiring contract towards in terms of upgrades at the deadline: (either/or)
Possibility 1-
(This premise)
Westbrick to Miami (cap relief). And the Flakers would get back something along the lines of Lowry/ Robinson/ fillers or whatever?? Miami just wants to get off Lowry's salary because Arisan wants to reduce their tax penalty I believe.
Possibility 2-
(The Utah premise)
Westbrick/ 2 firsts (27' and 29' picks) for Conley/Beasley/ fillers (hopefully not Vanderbilt too).
But either team trading players/assets to the flakers for Westbrick's expiring is so they could buy him out for immediate cap savings or to just let him expire to reduce payroll / tax penalties as both teams are over tax line or very close to it already. So I think that may account for the mutual interest in these premises?
