It makes sense. There's no real room for him and rivers is probably a better player at this point
Official Patrick Beverley Thread
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
guest81
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,918
- And1: 2,363
- Joined: Jun 26, 2014
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
It makes sense. There's no real room for him and rivers is probably a better player at this point
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
UnFadeable21
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,712
- And1: 845
- Joined: Mar 30, 2019
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
Looks like Dane Moore lied trying to be first and report that Pat Bev was coming back
Hurts his credibility saying it was done deal
Hurts his credibility saying it was done deal
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
guest81
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,918
- And1: 2,363
- Joined: Jun 26, 2014
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
UnFadeable21 wrote:Looks like Dane Moore lied trying to be first and report that Pat Bev was coming back
Hurts his credibility saying it was done deal
If that bums you out, don't follow anything Doogie says
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,754
- And1: 23,084
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
UnFadeable21 wrote:Looks like Dane Moore lied trying to be first and report that Pat Bev was coming back
Hurts his credibility saying it was done deal
Where did he say it was a done deal?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
UnFadeable21
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,712
- And1: 845
- Joined: Mar 30, 2019
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
Klomp wrote:UnFadeable21 wrote:Looks like Dane Moore lied trying to be first and report that Pat Bev was coming back
Hurts his credibility saying it was done deal
Where did he say it was a done deal?
?s=46&t=SMFWV-gN9NfuEVUKGCiQzw
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,754
- And1: 23,084
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
UnFadeable21 wrote:Klomp wrote:UnFadeable21 wrote:Looks like Dane Moore lied trying to be first and report that Pat Bev was coming back
Hurts his credibility saying it was done deal
Where did he say it was a done deal?
?s=46&t=SMFWV-gN9NfuEVUKGCiQzw
in the works: being planned, worked on, or produced.
Nowhere in that definition does it say done deal. Dane also said multiple teams are interested in him.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
- Domejandro
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves

- Posts: 20,555
- And1: 31,015
- Joined: Jul 29, 2014
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
Klomp wrote:in the works: being planned, worked on, or produced.
Nowhere in that definition does it say done deal. Dane also said multiple teams are interested in him.
I am actually critical of Dane here, dude completely jumped the gun. I was even saying before his tweet that the fit is questionable; pretty much every insider has indicated that Patrick Beverly back to Minnesota is - in-fact - not "in the works".
It's cool if Patrick Beverly ends up coming back, but there is nothing that indicates that Dane's suggestive tweet was accurate. In the end, it isn't a big deal, but I kinda get the vibe from Dane sometimes that he is more-so an excited and knowledgeable fan than a full-on insider, currently.
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
UnFadeable21
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,712
- And1: 845
- Joined: Mar 30, 2019
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
Domejandro wrote:Klomp wrote:in the works: being planned, worked on, or produced.
Nowhere in that definition does it say done deal. Dane also said multiple teams are interested in him.
I am actually critical of Dane here, dude completely jumped the gun. I was even saying before his tweet that the fit is questionable; pretty much every insider has indicated that Patrick Beverly back to Minnesota is - in-fact - not "in the works".
It's cool if Patrick Beverly ends up coming back, but there is nothing that indicates that Dane's suggestive tweet was accurate.
Yup “in the works” means significant progress is being made to get the deal done and stein and Jon K said nothing is being done.
Dane jumped the gun to try and be the first to report it. Everyone else referenced Dane that Pat Bev is signing back with the wolves because they thought a wolves reporter was “credible”
Now he’s not
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,624
- And1: 6,476
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
Klomp wrote:UnFadeable21 wrote:Klomp wrote:Where did he say it was a done deal?
?s=46&t=SMFWV-gN9NfuEVUKGCiQzw
in the works: being planned, worked on, or produced.
Nowhere in that definition does it say done deal. Dane also said multiple teams are interested in him.
I read other versions where he said expected to rejoin the Wolves. That's not saying done deal, but it's not far off.
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
TimberKat
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,196
- And1: 3,133
- Joined: Jul 02, 2022
-
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
Between PatBev, Wall, Westbrook, I hope we get one of them. I think these trades and releases also show that Conley and DLo are valued over the other 3 around the league.
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
Baseline81
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,277
- And1: 1,909
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
TimberKat wrote:Between PatBev, Wall, Westbrook, I hope we get one of them. I think these trades and releases also show that Conley and DLo are valued over the other 3 around the league.
Why would you possibly want Wall or Westbrook on this team?
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
Zonarosa
- Sophomore
- Posts: 130
- And1: 80
- Joined: Jul 02, 2022
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
UnFadeable21 wrote:Looks like Dane Moore lied trying to be first and report that Pat Bev was coming back
Hurts his credibility saying it was done deal
oh no, not that.
anyway…
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
TimberKat
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,196
- And1: 3,133
- Joined: Jul 02, 2022
-
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
Baseline81 wrote:TimberKat wrote:Between PatBev, Wall, Westbrook, I hope we get one of them. I think these trades and releases also show that Conley and DLo are valued over the other 3 around the league.
Why would you possibly want Wall or Westbrook on this team?
Could be I miss the craziness of DLo?
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
wolves_89
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,167
- And1: 4,658
- Joined: Jul 10, 2012
-
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
Listened to Dane Moore's post trade deadline podcast and he said that he was told that the Wolves were interested in Beverley. I wonder if there are different factions in the Wolves front office with some in favor of bringing back Pat Bev and some against. In the podcast Britt Robson questioned if he still made sense with the current roster.
I'll be curious where Beverley ends up and I still think he would be a great addition for Minnesota. This team needs somebody to help them break out of the low energy stretches that happens way too often.
I'll be curious where Beverley ends up and I still think he would be a great addition for Minnesota. This team needs somebody to help them break out of the low energy stretches that happens way too often.
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
Murphs56
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,699
- And1: 1,250
- Joined: Nov 13, 2012
-
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
Different set of circumstances for Pat Bev if he were to come back. There's minutes for him in certain matchups but nothing like last year. When KAT comes back, I can see a lot of Ant-Jaden-Anderson-Kat-Gobert even to close.
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,623
- And1: 19,722
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
On twitter they show Bev's GPS showing Wisconsin Dells. Take it for what it's worth. Isn't Bev close friends with Crowder? Bucks got two open roster spots with Thursday trade.
Yes, the Dells is closer to Milwaukee than here, but it’s a lot closer than LAC!
I still think it’s pretty unlikely, but the thought of a PatBev return makes me happy.
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
fattymcgee
- Senior
- Posts: 558
- And1: 301
- Joined: Apr 03, 2008
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
Baseline81 wrote:TimberKat wrote:Between PatBev, Wall, Westbrook, I hope we get one of them. I think these trades and releases also show that Conley and DLo are valued over the other 3 around the league.
Why would you possibly want Wall or Westbrook on this team?
No kidding! Two guys who can't shoot or play defense. And they would throw a fit when only getting minimal minutes.
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,623
- And1: 19,722
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
guest81 wrote:
It makes sense. There's no real room for him and rivers is probably a better player at this point
I heard another podcast echo this sentiment, and I’m not sure I disagree. I know his play fell off. They added that maybe there is a time limit on how long Beverley is a good thing from an emotional impact as well, particularly on Ant. You know if he came here, he’d want minutes. The team has adult voices that can help lead the team now, and point Ant in the right direction.
This makes sense to me, but emotionally I’d like Pat back. I think he makes basketball fun, and maybe (?) his positives outweigh his negatives. But cutting Bryn Forbes has already happened - we’d have to cut someone useful, either Nate Knight or Austin Rivers (to create minutes), and he might have a relationship with Ant. We also added NAW, who we probably want to see. Does a Beverley return make any sense?
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
wolves_89
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,167
- And1: 4,658
- Joined: Jul 10, 2012
-
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
shrink wrote:guest81 wrote:
It makes sense. There's no real room for him and rivers is probably a better player at this point
I heard another podcast echo this sentiment, and I’m not sure I disagree. I know his play fell off. They added that maybe there is a time limit on how long Beverley is a good thing from an emotional impact as well, particularly on Ant. You know if he came here, he’d want minutes. The team has adult voices that can help lead the team now, and point Ant in the right direction.
This makes sense to me, but emotionally I’d like Pat back. I think he makes basketball fun, and maybe (?) his positives outweigh his negatives. But cutting Bryn Forbes has already happened - we’d have to cut someone useful, either Nate Knight or Austin Rivers (to create minutes), and he might have a relationship with Ant. We also added NAW, who we probably want to see. Does a Beverley return make any sense?
I think Beverley makes sense just from the standpoint of getting Rivers out of the rotation. If Finch was willing to play NAW I'd be less interested, but I'm skeptical that is going to happen. The numbers are pretty clear in showing Rivers has been truly terrible this year (EPM -3.2, RPM -4.85, RAPTOR -4.0), but Finch continues to play him. I would love to see Beverley completely take over the same role as Rivers and I would expect him to be massively better at it.
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
-
BlacJacMac
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,941
- And1: 3,622
- Joined: Aug 25, 2020
-
Re: Official Patrick Beverley Thread
One thing that doesn't get mentioned enough is Bev's "bad season" was really just a horrible start.
FG%/3P% by month:
OCT: 29/19
NOV: 26/27
DEC: 50/41
JAN: 39/37
FEB: 70/50 (3 games)
FG%/3P% by month:
OCT: 29/19
NOV: 26/27
DEC: 50/41
JAN: 39/37
FEB: 70/50 (3 games)
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves



