Fairview4Life wrote:The Warriors did hold out Ellis and Maggette etc. for the last few weeks of 08/09 to tank.
ya, very similar to the Raps TB tank. They were trying to win but then pulled the plug later in the season.
Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
Fairview4Life wrote:The Warriors did hold out Ellis and Maggette etc. for the last few weeks of 08/09 to tank.
Duffman100 wrote:Reeko wrote:Duffman100 wrote:
No. They were attempting to build around the core that was Ellis, Jrich, Biedrins etc. They were rolling out guys like Maggette, Stephen Jackson, Jamal Crawford. And were winning 40+ games with that core for a bit. They just sucked in a really tough West.
Curry was drafted 7th
Klay was drafted 11th
Green was drafted 35th.
You can make an argument that they did tank. They had 3 out of 4 seasons where they won less than 30 games. They probably started out those seasons trying to be competitive but at some point the writing was on the wall and they must have decided to just get a pick as high in the lottery as possible. In that 4 year span they drafted 7th twice, and 11th once.
But they weren't tanking and if you remember what they were doing. Look at their roster.
Those picks aren't too far off where we're at right now. Also where we were at when we drafted Ross, Derozan, Ed Davis, etc....
They shouldn't be a the poster child for what this thread wants. They just drafted really well.

Reeko wrote:Duffman100 wrote:Reeko wrote:You can make an argument that they did tank. They had 3 out of 4 seasons where they won less than 30 games. They probably started out those seasons trying to be competitive but at some point the writing was on the wall and they must have decided to just get a pick as high in the lottery as possible. In that 4 year span they drafted 7th twice, and 11th once.
But they weren't tanking and if you remember what they were doing. Look at their roster.
Those picks aren't too far off where we're at right now. Also where we were at when we drafted Ross, Derozan, Ed Davis, etc....
They shouldn't be a the poster child for what this thread wants. They just drafted really well.
No they aren't, but l think lines get blurred between just sucking and just letting the end of the season go to waste to improve your chances in the draft, versus just flat out tanking from the rip. I think most of the posters here were fine with giving this team a shot at competing this season even if it was a likely 1st round exit. But once guys started seeing the struggle just to be a play-in team they threw their hands up and wanted to forfeit the season.

DelAbbot wrote:Duffman100 wrote:Reeko wrote:You can make an argument that they did tank. They had 3 out of 4 seasons where they won less than 30 games. They probably started out those seasons trying to be competitive but at some point the writing was on the wall and they must have decided to just get a pick as high in the lottery as possible. In that 4 year span they drafted 7th twice, and 11th once.
But they weren't tanking and if you remember what they were doing. Look at their roster.
Those picks aren't too far off where we're at right now. Also where we were at when we drafted Ross, Derozan, Ed Davis, etc....
They shouldn't be a the poster child for what this thread wants. They just drafted really well.
No one in this thread wants the exact same thing. Everyone is different.
I want to see Fred gone and we tank rest of this year to draft a high end prospect. Next year we run Poeltl+Pascal+Scottie+OG+new prospect with GTJ re-signed coming off the bench.
Duffman100 wrote:DelAbbot wrote:Duffman100 wrote:
But they weren't tanking and if you remember what they were doing. Look at their roster.
Those picks aren't too far off where we're at right now. Also where we were at when we drafted Ross, Derozan, Ed Davis, etc....
They shouldn't be a the poster child for what this thread wants. They just drafted really well.
No one in this thread wants the exact same thing. Everyone is different.
I want to see Fred gone and we tank rest of this year to draft a high end prospect. Next year we run Poeltl+Pascal+Scottie+OG+new prospect with GTJ re-signed coming off the bench.
Is there anyone here that wants us to consistently be in the 7-11 range for the next 3-4 years?

God Squad wrote:Duffman100 wrote:DelAbbot wrote:No one in this thread wants the exact same thing. Everyone is different.
I want to see Fred gone and we tank rest of this year to draft a high end prospect. Next year we run Poeltl+Pascal+Scottie+OG+new prospect with GTJ re-signed coming off the bench.
Is there anyone here that wants us to consistently be in the 7-11 range for the next 3-4 years?
While it's not the ideal range to be in. You can refill the cupboard with those slots
Demar at 9
Ross at 8
Jak 9
Realistically you can fill the bench or roster at any spot. But trading picks when you need them in the worst way isn't the way to go. Masai/Bobby need to start hitting on picks wherever they land. Our bench and development has been lacking in the worst way.
Duffman100 wrote:God Squad wrote:Duffman100 wrote:
Is there anyone here that wants us to consistently be in the 7-11 range for the next 3-4 years?
While it's not the ideal range to be in. You can refill the cupboard with those slots
Demar at 9
Ross at 8
Jak 9
Realistically you can fill the bench or roster at any spot. But trading picks when you need them in the worst way isn't the way to go. Masai/Bobby need to start hitting on picks wherever they land. Our bench and development has been lacking in the worst way.
Oh I agree. I don't love the deal and I love Jacob. I hate dealing picks (especially with only top 6 protection) when your team has been bad.

God Squad wrote:Duffman100 wrote:God Squad wrote:While it's not the ideal range to be in. You can refill the cupboard with those slots
Demar at 9
Ross at 8
Jak 9
Realistically you can fill the bench or roster at any spot. But trading picks when you need them in the worst way isn't the way to go. Masai/Bobby need to start hitting on picks wherever they land. Our bench and development has been lacking in the worst way.
Oh I agree. I don't love the deal and I love Jacob. I hate dealing picks (especially with only top 6 protection) when your team has been bad.
Agreed. I'm a Jakob fan, but we have so many holes at the moment. It's a deal that could have been avoided. I'm just hoping for a FVV/OG trade for two reasons.
1. OG - To recoup draft picks and hopefully get another team to "tank" for us. Plus too many overlapping skillset's.
2. FVV - To reestablish an identity/playstyle. Our product on the court has been an eyesore for some time and it's just time.
On the surface I'm happy to have Jakob back. But the protections on that trade are severely lacking and it just compounded my initial feelings towards this team.
God Squad wrote:Duffman100 wrote:God Squad wrote:While it's not the ideal range to be in. You can refill the cupboard with those slots
Demar at 9
Ross at 8
Jak 9
Realistically you can fill the bench or roster at any spot. But trading picks when you need them in the worst way isn't the way to go. Masai/Bobby need to start hitting on picks wherever they land. Our bench and development has been lacking in the worst way.
Oh I agree. I don't love the deal and I love Jacob. I hate dealing picks (especially with only top 6 protection) when your team has been bad.
Agreed. I'm a Jakob fan, but we have so many holes at the moment. It's a deal that could have been avoided. I'm just hoping for a FVV/OG trade for two reasons.
1. OG - To recoup draft picks and hopefully get another team to "tank" for us. Plus too many overlapping skillset's.
2. FVV - To reestablish an identity/playstyle. Our product on the court has been an eyesore for some time and it's just time.
On the surface I'm happy to have Jakob back. But the protections on that trade are severely lacking and it just compounded my initial feelings towards this team.
dTox wrote:Duffman100 wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:The problem with a multi year tank is that even if you get really lucky and draft a great player, because you've stripped the roster down to basically nothing, it's very hard to build it back up again to the point where you're a contender.
It might take years just to get back to .500 let alone contention and great players nowadays get impatient very quickly. They will demand out and it typically happens in their next contract after their rookie deal. Forget about even winning a title, how many great players that were drafted with top picks actually stuck it out with their original team?
It seems that the best kind of tanks are the stealth tanks and those are one year tanks usually the result of major injuries. This way, you can add a great young player to your existing core.
Exactly what happened with Cleveland and Lebron. He was dragging a bunch of dead weight and even a GOAT couldn't win a title with that bunch. He had to leave, they had to reset with a bunch of high picks to then build around him.
I'm not in favor of multi-year tanking, however, here are the reasons why the Cavs lost Lebron (the first time):
-Drafted Luke Jackson with the 10th pick in 04 (the year after drafting Lebron)
-didn't have first round pick after 04 until 06
-Blew their wad in guys like Larry Hughes in free agency,
-trading for an aging Shaq,
-let Carlos boozer walk with nothing in return
In fact, what the Cavs did was the opposite of tank, they refused to acquire draft picks to surround James with blue chip prospects, made short sighted moves for aging players who were on the decline, and the one guy who was a decent side kick (Boozer), walked from the team and thrived in Utah.
Duffman100 wrote:Tacoma wrote:Duffman100 wrote:
Okay, so that's sort of one. They drafted the GOAT, he left. They then continued to tank. If Lebron doesnt' resign with them, they aren't relevant. Luckily he did and they had the assets from tanking to build around him.
Look at this.
How many of these teams actually 'tanked'. The Thunder? Sure.
The Spurs lost Robinson for a year.
Bulls? Nope?
Heat? Nope.
Lakers? Nope.
Warriors? Nope.
Bucks? Nope.
Rockets? Nope.
Jazz? Nope.
Nets? Nope.
Pistons? Nope.
Raptors? Nope.
Mavericks? Nope.
I'm up for getting a high draft pick and would be excited to team someone with Barnes. But there's just no evidence tanking works.
In those 29 years shown on your list, only a dozen have won a Championship. What this says is tank or not, it's hard to win a Championship, so the answer is going to be a low number in the first place.
A better question is of those Championship teams over 29 seasons, how many have won with at least one of the players they drafted being their top 2 players? By my count, it's only 2 teams: the 2004 Pistons (Prince was not top 2) and our 2019 Raptors (Siakam was not top 2, although that's arguable). The rest, like Kobe with LA, Duncan with SA, Dallas with Dirk, Bucks with Giannis, etc., won with a cornerstone player that they drafted.
So drafting a cornerstone player is a key prerequisite to being a Championship team. Stats also show that generally the higher you draft the better your chances of finding that cornerstone player (see here for example). Therefore you want to draft as high as possible. Thus teams tank.
But not all teams tank. And again, it doesn't seem like there is a direct correlation between tanking and team success.
The majority of teams winning titles didn't actively tank. Lakers didn't get Kobe from tanking, Bucks didn't get Giannis from tanking, etc etc.
The point being is that there are multiple avenues to get a title. Sure, you need that top 5-10 player, that cornerstone player. But when you go into a draft and tank, only ONE team gets that player. The rest are loser in the process.
And as the Cavs example. You can tank and get a GOAT...but you have to build around them.
KL78192020 wrote:God Squad wrote:Duffman100 wrote:
Oh I agree. I don't love the deal and I love Jacob. I hate dealing picks (especially with only top 6 protection) when your team has been bad.
Agreed. I'm a Jakob fan, but we have so many holes at the moment. It's a deal that could have been avoided. I'm just hoping for a FVV/OG trade for two reasons.
1. OG - To recoup draft picks and hopefully get another team to "tank" for us. Plus too many overlapping skillset's.
2. FVV - To reestablish an identity/playstyle. Our product on the court has been an eyesore for some time and it's just time.
On the surface I'm happy to have Jakob back. But the protections on that trade are severely lacking and it just compounded my initial feelings towards this team.
At this point it doesn’t make sense to trade OG for picks since Masai decided he wants to win now, they will probably keep OG or trade him for an established player. Trading OG for picks makes this team worse next year.
ConSarnit wrote:"years to get back to .500": this current team is 4 games under .500. We're not exactly tearing down a dynasty here.
ConSarnit wrote: "stealth tank": are there any other examples of this working outside of Tim Duncan? Scottie is TBD. I don't think the Warriors are overly thrilled with their 2020 "stealth tank" considering Wiseman isn't even on the team anymore
ConSarnit wrote: ""players demanding out": what star has demanded out while still on their 2nd contract? I can't think of anyone outside of Davis (who did it with half season left). If you can't build a team around a guy in 7 years you probably deserve to lose them.
DelAbbot wrote:Duffman100 wrote:Reeko wrote:You can make an argument that they did tank. They had 3 out of 4 seasons where they won less than 30 games. They probably started out those seasons trying to be competitive but at some point the writing was on the wall and they must have decided to just get a pick as high in the lottery as possible. In that 4 year span they drafted 7th twice, and 11th once.
But they weren't tanking and if you remember what they were doing. Look at their roster.
Those picks aren't too far off where we're at right now. Also where we were at when we drafted Ross, Derozan, Ed Davis, etc....
They shouldn't be a the poster child for what this thread wants. They just drafted really well.
No one in this thread wants the exact same thing. Everyone is different.
I want to see Fred gone and we tank rest of this year to draft a high end prospect. Next year we run Poeltl+Pascal+Scottie+OG+new prospect with GTJ re-signed coming off the bench.