GOAT case for KAJ?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

rk2023
Starter
Posts: 2,266
And1: 2,272
Joined: Jul 01, 2022
   

Re: GOAT case for KAJ? 

Post#241 » by rk2023 » Wed Feb 22, 2023 6:15 am

LukaTheGOAT wrote:
HeartBreakKid wrote:1990 Jordan "losing" kind of defeats the whole "if this player is so good why did he lose?" argument.

If the literal GOAT lost then obviously losing because you have a team that isn't good enough is perfectly valid. Of course people will try to make it seem like 91 Jordan is better than 90 Jordan like they do with every championship year vs non champ years.


Well, statistically, he was better in 91 than 90 by the one-number metrics we have and general stat indicators. Whether you believe that information is enough evidence for him being better is another thing.


Do you have any side by side holistic stat comparisons (asking out of intrigue)? Would Appreciate intel if so!
Mogspan wrote:I think they see the super rare combo of high IQ with freakish athleticism and overrate the former a bit, kind of like a hot girl who is rather articulate being thought of as “super smart.” I don’t know kind of a weird analogy, but you catch my drift.
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,261
And1: 2,972
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: GOAT case for KAJ? 

Post#242 » by LukaTheGOAT » Wed Feb 22, 2023 6:16 am

HeartBreakKid wrote:
LukaTheGOAT wrote:
HeartBreakKid wrote:1990 Jordan "losing" kind of defeats the whole "if this player is so good why did he lose?" argument.

If the literal GOAT lost then obviously losing because you have a team that isn't good enough is perfectly valid. Of course people will try to make it seem like 91 Jordan is better than 90 Jordan like they do with every championship year vs non champ years.


Well, statistically, he was better in 91 than 90 by the one-number metrics we have and general stat indicators. Whether you believe that information is enough evidence for him being better is another thing.


If someone wanted to say 91 Jordan was better than that's fine. But what would that make 1990? His second best season? He still has 5 other seasons where he won rings that are worse than his 90 season.


Okay I get your point.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,877
And1: 25,195
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: GOAT case for KAJ? 

Post#243 » by 70sFan » Wed Feb 22, 2023 7:22 am

dygaction wrote:
Cavsfansince84 wrote:
dygaction wrote:
He is one of the GOATs so of course overall still impressive. The clip I gave was a pretty bad 5 min 4-quarter for KAJ, especially when you call him playing at a GOAT level, on an otherwise winnable game.


You're saying all of this sort of like MJ never had bad games much less 5 minute stretches in the playoffs. It's a ridiculously high standard you are using tbh that's to the point of nitpicking imo.


of course there are... 70s said it was a GOAT level playoff series from KAJ, i said i remembered he had stint of weak performances, 70s asked for some evidence and I posted a clip. Jordan, Kobe, LeBron all had those moments. When you want to talk about GOAT, not a superstar, how can a >5-min continuous clip in a 4th quarter playoff game that resulted in team loss nickpicking? Did you watch it?

Have you ever tried to analyze parts of games from other GOAT-level seasons? They all have weaker moments, especially if you want to focus on a 5 minutes stretches. It's a fair criticism, but I fail to see how it changes anything I said.

Return to Player Comparisons