LukaTheGOAT wrote:HeartBreakKid wrote:1990 Jordan "losing" kind of defeats the whole "if this player is so good why did he lose?" argument.
If the literal GOAT lost then obviously losing because you have a team that isn't good enough is perfectly valid. Of course people will try to make it seem like 91 Jordan is better than 90 Jordan like they do with every championship year vs non champ years.
Well, statistically, he was better in 91 than 90 by the one-number metrics we have and general stat indicators. Whether you believe that information is enough evidence for him being better is another thing.
Do you have any side by side holistic stat comparisons (asking out of intrigue)? Would Appreciate intel if so!