Cubbies2120 wrote:Magic Giannison wrote:Johnny Firpo wrote:
Not when a center is averaging a triple-double organically, while being 33rd in usage rate, and scoring 25 a game on 70% freakin' TS. Let's be real, the most you can argue is that Giannis is not without merit, but you guys do not argue that. You guys are arguing that Jokic does not deserve the award, which is asinine. He is having what's most likely the greatest regular season ever on the offensive end, and it's likely not very close.
They both deserve the award thats the whole point of arguing about it. A lot of people just don't take TS% as a gospel to consider someone for the best offense ever which is wrong in my opinion on many levels.
There is major statistical evidence that higher usage impacts efficiency negativity because the increased production doesn't translate into taking best shots.Hence why vast majority of players have dropped their efficiency in the playoffs when their usages increase
- TS% alone is not gospel for being the "best offense ever", because it ALONE lacks context...there are people who shot 70%+ TS in a season before, but the context is that none of them averaged more than 12ppg...Jokic is scoring double that, while also maintaining efficiency that people who get only open dunks have maintained in the past. Now add onto that how he increases his entire team's efficiency and puts them into position to score at incredible clips...THAT, when packaged together, is what people are referring to as the best offense - TS% alone? Nope. PPG? Nah, Assists? Nope, but the combination of all of those...
Same concept but flipped to defensive end for Giannis - he's not a great defender because he blocks a lot of shots, or gets a lot of steals, but a combination of his situational awareness, ability to defend many positions, while still putting up dominant numbers on the defensive end. It's a combo of all of that.
Rudy Gobert which i pointed above had 69.99 TS % averaging 15.1 points.
For Jokic all i did i explained how he shifted his production compared to last year, thats why his efficiency rose by 4 % while he shoots nearly 3 shots less and his usage dropped by 4 % as well.
Jokic was already shooting at historical level that 4 % doesn't changes the overall scoring production he gives.
I think you guys underestimate how much better Jokic passing translates for is team this compared to last year THAT is what makes him better player because he made his already biggest strength to translate into more wins for his team.
As for Giannis and defense, unfortunately trying to calculate defense is so damn noisy as huge portion of defense doesn't translate into production like offense. I agree with you about blocks steals etc. and argue many times that Brook Lopez for example isn't better defender than Giannis or that Bucks defense would be the same with either of them. There is a reason why Brook Lopez became good defender with Milwaukee but thats a different talk all together.
EDIT: Hold up, Rudy Gobert last year had 15.6 ppg on 73 %TS ?