Fantastik_Goat wrote:AleksandarN wrote:Fantastik_Goat wrote:I think Perkins should be fired. Fair is fair. I think Part of the problem is that Jokic doesn’t deserve to win 3 in a row. Whenever Jordan and Lebron won two they found someone else to give it to Barkley, Malone, Rose, Durant. In every one of the those cases the player lead their team to at least the #1 seed in their conference, if not the whole league. So the real problem here is that Embid should have won two years ago when someone other than Giannis had to win and Embid lead Philly to the #1 seed. Jokic should be winning his second and he clearly deserves it this year.
2 years ago when Embiid played only 51 games. Tell me how he “deserved it” over jokic? Jokic played 20 more games than Embiid. Had comparative stats.
28.5 pts 10.6 rebs 2.8 asts
26.4 pts 10.8 rebs 8.3 asts
49 wins vs 47 wins while embiid missed more than 20 more games than Jokic. Tell me how Embiid deserved it over jokic? I like how there is some revisionist history going on to discredit Jokic’s mvps. This crap should stop.
Reread what you highlighted. I’m saying Giannis deserved it, but the voters seem to always find a way to deny players a third MVP andthey have always done that by giving it to the best player on a #1 seed.
The only player in the last 40 years to win MVP with a lower win % than Jokic is Westbrook and if h wins this year he will at his current win % he will have won with the 2nd 3rd and 9th worst win% in the last 40years
just FYI, had Giannis or Joel won last year only Russ and jordon would have won with a lower win %.
Is it really such a different message?