Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Lockdown504090
RealGM
Posts: 11,854
And1: 12,718
Joined: Nov 24, 2015
         

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#521 » by Lockdown504090 » Wed Mar 8, 2023 1:30 am

eyeatoma wrote:
Lockdown504090 wrote:
Jfh20 wrote:what? what does the skin color of the commissioner have to do with anything? why are people so fixated on color these days? :crazy: what a weird generation we are living in

yes, mark tatum will stop the white supremacist media corporation through the overwhelming power of his 50 percent melinated skin. :lol: I will be proud to watch louis Farrakhan hold the nba championship in 2027 when the racist ballmer sells the team to him and the La Liberation win their first nba championship.


Is it so ridiculous to ask that a predominantly black league by commission by a black person? What do people feel threatened by me suggesting this? Especially given the history of this country, as well as the issues it's had with a few owners.

Because there are a lot of white laywers and corporate executives. the commish works for the owners who are also corporate executives. its not that illogical. The reasons for those have a racial history that you have to be joking to deny, but saying "I'm just asking" is poking around in the dark. Its very hard for black people to not think constantly about color because it has so much affect unless you are a millionaire, but the NBAPA is probably one of the 50 strongest unions in America, run by black people. If that had a bunch of white people at the top if it, then id probably be right there with you.
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,859
And1: 13,153
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#522 » by eyeatoma » Wed Mar 8, 2023 1:32 am

Lockdown504090 wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
Lockdown504090 wrote:yes, mark tatum will stop the white supremacist media corporation through the overwhelming power of his 50 percent melinated skin. :lol: I will be proud to watch louis Farrakhan hold the nba championship in 2027 when the racist ballmer sells the team to him and the La Liberation win their first nba championship.


Is it so ridiculous to ask that a predominantly black league by commission by a black person? What do people feel threatened by me suggesting this? Especially given the history of this country, as well as the issues it's had with a few owners.

Because there are a lot of white laywers and corporate executives. the commish works for the owners who are also corporate executives. its not that illogical. The reasons for those have a racial history that you have to be joking to deny, but saying "I'm just asking" is poking around in the dark. Its very hard for black people to not think constantly about color because it has so much affect unless you are a millionaire, but the NBAPA is probably one of the 50 strongest unions in America, run by black people. If that had a bunch of white people at the top if it, then id probably be right there with you.


I think the word owner should also be banned in this context. The concept that a person owns a team with black players is pretty cringe given the history of the United States. Not saying anything about you, but just the concept in general. I think one of the biggest problems with the NBA and the NFL is that the teams are predominantly represented by white people. At this point it really needs to be a diverse group of "owners/representatives", not just white, or not just black. Honestly not something I see changing for the next 100 years, but that's how you start with addressing the problem.
User avatar
levon
RealGM
Posts: 17,319
And1: 27,102
Joined: Aug 04, 2017

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#523 » by levon » Wed Mar 8, 2023 1:35 am

Perkins' statement was reckless, and "European" is clearly a stand-in for white (Nash wasn't European, Giannis is, etc.) But I don't understand how what Redick did was some kind of dunk. Is it because Perkins got emotional? Redick made no clear point whatsoever. Was his point that Perkins shouldn't accuse the media of being racist? Did Perkins explicitly call the voting panelists racists? I took it to mean there are racial lenses through which we assess players, good and bad. I'm sure Redick's experienced it himself, listening to how he's covered as a white player in a black league. I'm sure the perception of him has been positive in undeserved ways and negative in undeserved ways because of his race. And I'm sure this has effects on his post-playing career as well.

But the more I think about it, it was so wrong to do this on TV. If it was wrong of Perk, fine, but two wrongs don't make a right. It seems more and more like a publicity stunt to boost his podcast numbers.

And I personally find both **** insufferable so I have no horse in this race.
Lockdown504090
RealGM
Posts: 11,854
And1: 12,718
Joined: Nov 24, 2015
         

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#524 » by Lockdown504090 » Wed Mar 8, 2023 1:47 am

eyeatoma wrote:
Lockdown504090 wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
Is it so ridiculous to ask that a predominantly black league by commission by a black person? What do people feel threatened by me suggesting this? Especially given the history of this country, as well as the issues it's had with a few owners.

Because there are a lot of white laywers and corporate executives. the commish works for the owners who are also corporate executives. its not that illogical. The reasons for those have a racial history that you have to be joking to deny, but saying "I'm just asking" is poking around in the dark. Its very hard for black people to not think constantly about color because it has so much affect unless you are a millionaire, but the NBAPA is probably one of the 50 strongest unions in America, run by black people. If that had a bunch of white people at the top if it, then id probably be right there with you.


I think the word owner should also be banned in this context. The concept that a person owns a team with black players is pretty cringe given the history of the United States. Not saying anything about you, but just the concept in general. I think one of the biggest problems with the NBA and the NFL is that the teams are predominantly represented by white people.
heres the issue. MJ owns a team, and merely acts as a capitalist, I dont know which black billionaires would actually act as anything other than a capitalist. Jay-Z maybe, but he probably wouldnt tie up so much money to buy a team. Other than that the other richest black people that would buy teams are either foreigners or people who would behave like any white owner. I understand the concern, but there isnt really much of a viable alternative.

What can happen is lebron kd and this gen retire, they can 100% buy one.
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,665
And1: 20,262
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#525 » by MrBigShot » Wed Mar 8, 2023 1:54 am

Kendrick Perkins is a racist sell out that has made a media career off of tearing down other players with lame cheap shots and dumb jokes like Ibaka (an African player) being significantly older.

He is a huge joke and it was nice to see JJ Redick call him out on his bs.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,859
And1: 13,153
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#526 » by eyeatoma » Wed Mar 8, 2023 1:54 am

Lockdown504090 wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
Lockdown504090 wrote:Because there are a lot of white laywers and corporate executives. the commish works for the owners who are also corporate executives. its not that illogical. The reasons for those have a racial history that you have to be joking to deny, but saying "I'm just asking" is poking around in the dark. Its very hard for black people to not think constantly about color because it has so much affect unless you are a millionaire, but the NBAPA is probably one of the 50 strongest unions in America, run by black people. If that had a bunch of white people at the top if it, then id probably be right there with you.


I think the word owner should also be banned in this context. The concept that a person owns a team with black players is pretty cringe given the history of the United States. Not saying anything about you, but just the concept in general. I think one of the biggest problems with the NBA and the NFL is that the teams are predominantly represented by white people.
heres the issue. MJ owns a team, and merely acts as a capitalist, I dont know which black billionaires would actually act as anything other than a capitalist. Jay-Z maybe, but he probably wouldnt tie up so much money to buy a team. Other than that the other richest black people that would buy teams are either foreigners or people who would behave like any white owner. I understand the concern, but there isnt really much of a viable alternative.

What can happen is lebron kd and this gen retire, they can 100% buy one.


That's stereotyping dude. Also, if you are the majority stakeholder, you have the right to run the team the way you want. Focusing solely on money will be horrible for the team product, but there are plenty of white owners that own the team just to make money. It's pretty much the #1 reason for most owners in sports lol. They're not owning a team to lose money lol.
jokeboy86
RealGM
Posts: 10,323
And1: 7,323
Joined: May 08, 2007

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#527 » by jokeboy86 » Wed Mar 8, 2023 1:55 am

eyeatoma wrote:
Lockdown504090 wrote:
Jfh20 wrote:what? what does the skin color of the commissioner have to do with anything? why are people so fixated on color these days? :crazy: what a weird generation we are living in

yes, mark tatum will stop the white supremacist media corporation through the overwhelming power of his 50 percent melinated skin. :lol: I will be proud to watch louis Farrakhan hold the nba championship in 2027 when the racist ballmer sells the team to him and the La Liberation win their first nba championship.


Is it so ridiculous to ask that a predominantly black league by commission by a black person? What do people feel threatened by me suggesting this? Especially given the history of this country, as well as the issues it's had with a few owners.


Its not ridiculous but will it even matter? There could be a black commissioner and they’ll still have the interests of the league and owners first because that’s their job. And you can bet the second they’re not sympathetic to everything the players want they’ll be called a sellout or “not one of us”. Obama went through the same thing. He was elected for two terms and you have some people who felt he should’ve done more for them cause he was black or he didnt do enough and nothing changed after he got their vote like he had some emperor like powers as president. Or look how people are now attacking Oprah and Jay-Z because they dont side with every single black celebrity or cause they work with white people. Kendrick said you cant please everybody so why bother when someone always is going to be unhappy no matter how hard you try.
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,859
And1: 13,153
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#528 » by eyeatoma » Wed Mar 8, 2023 1:56 am

jokeboy86 wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
Lockdown504090 wrote:yes, mark tatum will stop the white supremacist media corporation through the overwhelming power of his 50 percent melinated skin. :lol: I will be proud to watch louis Farrakhan hold the nba championship in 2027 when the racist ballmer sells the team to him and the La Liberation win their first nba championship.


Is it so ridiculous to ask that a predominantly black league by commission by a black person? What do people feel threatened by me suggesting this? Especially given the history of this country, as well as the issues it's had with a few owners.


Its not ridiculous but will it even matter? There could be a black commissioner and they’ll still have the interests of the league and owners first because that’s their job. And you can bet the second they’re not sympathetic to everything the players want they’ll be called a sellout or “not one of us”. Obama went through the same thing. He was elected for two terms and you have some people who felt he should’ve done more for them cause he was black or he didnt do enough and nothing changed after he got their vote like he had some emperor like powers as president. Or look how people are now attacking Oprah and Jay-Z because they dont side with every single black celebrity or cause they work with white people. Kendrick said you cant please everybody so why bother when someone always is going to be unhappy no matter how hard you try.


Which is why I say the owners need to be more diverse. Can't just be the commish.
HotRocks34
RealGM
Posts: 17,198
And1: 21,129
Joined: Jun 23, 2007

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#529 » by HotRocks34 » Wed Mar 8, 2023 2:11 am

https://www.si.com/extra-mustard/2023/03/08/charles-barkley-kendrick-perkins-jj-redick-espn-disease


“I always talk about ESPN disease,” Barkley said. “A lot of these guys, when they get on TV and stuff, they’re like, ‘Well I’m on ESPN; I got to say something provocative.’ And you know the thing about it, you’re always gonna get some fools out there, you guys probably get some fools calling in agreeing with him. … I can promise you this: I’ve never said anything on television just to get clicks.”

...

“This crossed a line,” Barkley said. “JJ is the only person to challenge Perk last week. I’m glad he did it, because when I first heard it, I said, ‘Man this has got to be one of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard.’”

...

Throughout the radio appearance, Barkley lavished praise on Jokić and credited him for not chasing stats, something he mentioned should be accounted for in the MVP debate.



Pretty much sums it up.

Perkins crossed a line, and I'm glad both Redick and Barkley called him on it.

There is zero argument against Jokic this year. At least so far. I've got the data laid out here:

viewtopic.php?p=104695087#p104695087

Arguments about Nash and Dirk? Ok. I have no problem with that. But Jokic deserved the award the last two years, and he deserves it (so far) this year. He's having a historic year. And no one else is. And his team has basically clinched the West already. And he has as many, or more, individual wins than any other MVP competitor. Etc.
Jokic 31/21/22
Luka & Oscar = 5 x 27/8/8
The Brodie = All-out energy
User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 54,169
And1: 10,441
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#530 » by HMFFL » Wed Mar 8, 2023 2:28 am

Wallace_Wallace wrote:
ReddoverKobe wrote:Think if Trent Dilfer or whatever NFL analyst has said Lamar only won his MVP because he's black.


Well Trent Dilfer is essentially the equivalent of Kendrick Perkins, the Ravens/Celtics were going to win that ring with or without him. But like most of us know, the NFL media is a lot more about the game (draft, free agents, gameplays, etc.) than it is about the drama.
And let's hope the NFL Network stays that way. I could see it possibly changing.

Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM mobile app
chudak
Pro Prospect
Posts: 825
And1: 398
Joined: Aug 06, 2006
   

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#531 » by chudak » Wed Mar 8, 2023 2:29 am

jokeboy86 wrote:
letskissbro wrote:Jokic isn't undeserving but he clearly doesn't suffer from the same arbitrary arguments that black players do.

If LeBron's name was LeBronović he'd have the 2006 and 2011 MVPs.


Are people really missing the context of him winning the MVP the past two seasons? For the umpteenth time, Embiid and Giannis's teams only finished 3 games ahead of Jokic and Jokic was missing his 2nd and 3rd best player and was the PER leader last year. The year before Embiid missed too many games and Giannis team finished behind Jokic's and Jokic again was the PER leader. I'm African American but this whole notion in '23 that everything having to do with a white person winning or selling more than a black person is racism has gone too far. I admit there are still absolutely circumstances where it still happens but now people act like its a conspiracy every single time. Whether's it's Eminem, Adele, or Timberlake or Taylor Swift or Harry Styles or the Oscars, or Tyson Fury or Loma or now Jokic and probably pretty soon Luka. It's not that deep every single time. And another thing that people forget is a lot of time the people voting for white entertainers or athletes or contributing to their success nowadays are Black people. Which goes to show you not everybody black is seeing things in that lens 24/7 and it doesn't mean they're necessarily a conservative or a sell out either which people are quick to accuse them of. And again we're talking about entertainment lol. We're talking about games that little kids play or things that people receive little gold idol trophies for. Let's save that energy for other things.


the reason LeBron does not have 5 straight MVPs (2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013) is that Rose won it in 2011.

and the reason he won it was because LeBron won 2 in Cleveland (2009, 2010) and played 2010/2011 in Miami with Wade and Bosh and was 2nd seed while Rose was first seed. So he had the superteam formation and drop in stats from playing with 2 all time greats going against him that year, it was not some super conspiracy or voter fatigue or lack of playoff success

he was the league villain for a year with Heatles and MVP award is always at least a bit narrative driven as it given based on voting

the narative at the time was that you cant win MVP by playing with 2 all time great superstars as they could have arguably been a second seed without him

hell LeBron finished 3rd in voting that year behind Dwight - https://www.basketball-reference.com/awards/awards_2011.html

he also did not win the title in his first year in Miami but won another MVP next year in 2012, after chocking away the finals against Dallas in 2011

so yes this idea that Jokic in 2023 should be influenced by what happened in 1993 when Barkley was MVP over Jordan who did it in 1991 and 1992, or what happened with LeBron in 2011, or that Embiid should have won it in 2021 while playing 50 games in the regular season is crazy

if someone wants to say that Embiid or Giannins deserve the MVP more this year for their performance and impact on the court this year - fine - that can be debated, but that they should be somehow given the MVP because of whatever reason over something that happened in some other year is nuts

Its like me saying Kobe Bryant who finished 2nd in MVP voting in 2009 should have won it over Derrick Rose in 2011 as he was more deserving. Sure, that might be true, but the award was for 2011 and what happened in 2009 does not count
Image
LessEyeTest
Junior
Posts: 485
And1: 651
Joined: Apr 25, 2022

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#532 » by LessEyeTest » Wed Mar 8, 2023 2:34 am

I love how nobody in the media will call out Perkins for being a racist. Meanwhile, if someone dared to imply that Jokic had an MVP stolen this year by a black player (e.g. Embiid) they'd be ostracized publicly and possibly lose their job.

Also saw @eyeatoma doing his usual trolling and riling some of you up. LOL
The Sebastian Express
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,466
And1: 11,847
Joined: Dec 10, 2004

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#533 » by The Sebastian Express » Wed Mar 8, 2023 2:55 am

JDR720 wrote:
The Sebastian Express wrote:I know not a lot of people want to hear this on this board but you can actually see this in effect with the new discourse around the scratches and cuts on Jokic. And how there's now this idea that he doesn't get enough trips to the line despite the way he's all cut up.

But all players get cut up. Terribly so. As another person who is extremely, extremely, and I do mean extremely blindingly white - it's a lot easier to see cuts on white skin than it is on darker skin. But we never hear a real discourse around how cut up Joel Embiid, LeBron, etc may be as well.

This extends into other areas of athletes. I'm mean let's not be disingenuous and sit here and act like American media doesn't salivate at the possibility of a next great white hope athlete, especially in basketball. This is a real thing that happens. Maybe less so these days but it does linger, it does help shape the narrative.

This isn't to discount Jokic's accomplishments by any means, a remarkable talent. We can still recognize his greatness while acknowledging how the media might be more eager to praise him and what he's done and shower him with awards based on his appearance. That isn't an indictment of Jokic, it's an indictment of a media that's still heavily white covering American professional sports which are decidedly not.

The issue with that argument is those white media people still voted for black players the vast majority of the time. And many of those voters are black too, including most of the best known ones. Stephen A has a vote. Mike Wilbon has a vote. Chris Broussard has a vote. David Aldridge has a vote. Greg Anthony has a vote. Chris Herring has a vote. Jalen Rose has a vote. David Aldridge has a vote. Even Kendrick Perkins has a vote.

The NBA media voters are basically a cast of ESPN, SI and The Athletic media people.

Here is the list I found:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1KMzwRcilLDej0BWl7eYE_OYC9Tx9olI_Ptn-nHjKfpQ/htmlview


Your argument about the past MVPs over the last decade doesn't have a great deal of weight. Besides Jokic, out of the last ten years which white player was even on a level to be considered for an MVP vote? It's an inconclusive argument within the context of performance.

The argument is akin to saying "In a field of consisting of five different flavors of jolly ranchers as rated by competing candies, the lollipops also voted for the jolly ranchers rather than lollipops."

A silly example, yes, but to the point.

Thank you for the link. I don't think it had your intended effect.

I counted all the voters. There was only one voter who I didn't feel comfortable trying to determine their ethnicity, so I left him out. I believe I counted up everyone right, but:

Of the people (minus the one gentleman) in the link, if I didn't skip over anyone, there's 116 eligible voters for MVP.

62% are white.

Black players of 2021 make up 73% of the league.


Of the 58 votes (minus the one gentleman) who are on record about who they voted for:
38 are white.
20 are People of Color.

39 of those votes were for Jokic.
26 were white media members, which is 68% of the white vote.
13 were from PoC media members, which is 65% of the PoC vote.

I'd like to see the shift in those numbers for the full account of votes, but this link didn't have who everyone voted for, since it seemed to be primarily going off information provided by those voters on twitter/articles/interviews.


But the real number is the first one listed, which again:

62% of the voting body in the link provided is white.

73% of the players in the league are Black.

Just because the NBA is better about some stuff than the NFl, NHL, MLB doesn't mean it doesn't have room to improve. Getting more diversity in front offices, in local reporting, these are just important first steps. Some of you may not like how eyeatoma is bringing their message across, but the message isn't wrong.

I'll bring up a story Greg Oden told after his playing days were over about his time in Portland, which may not seem relevant but to me it is. He said it was difficult for him to be in Portland because he was a young Black man in a city, a state, which is incredibly white. It's isolating. It's depressing. You don't see many, if any, people who look like you on a daily basis. It's hard to do and hard to feel comfortable and connect.

I brought this up because I want you all to think about how many teams are in heavily white cities. But made up of mostly Black players. But they're covered by majority, if not completely, local white reporters (for example I'm not sure if Portland currently has anyone covering the team from any of the state's major to minor publications who is Black. I think they all might be white at this time). Now take this to a wider scope and remember those numbers above. 62% of the voting body is white. On a national scale, how many media members reflecting and talking about the NBA on 'debate' shows, on the radio, are white compared to media members of color? How many local reporters being brought on to those shows are white reporters compared to reporters of color?

How do our own lived experiences, perceptions and prejudices influence how we write and report about players who look vastly different than us? Who grew up different than us? Who deal with incidents in life that we will never encounter and imagine? And how do we create and spread those narratives on a local and national scale?

Because while he is at the center of this thread and topic, again this isn't truly about Jokic. He's a great player. It's in truth about the media and in some way also fans. How the league is covered, who it is covered by, and what certain media members and fans want to come to pass.

Something little to think about that maybe doesn't mean a lot to some people, but maybe it'll get you asking some questions about how the game is covered:
How many Black athletes are described as articulate by white reporters?
How many white athletes are described as articulate by white reporters?
PennSports
Junior
Posts: 370
And1: 488
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
   

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#534 » by PennSports » Wed Mar 8, 2023 3:06 am

wanna know why these guys on are tv? Because youll talk about their braindead hot takes for weeks
User avatar
KingFox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,087
And1: 5,277
Joined: Dec 23, 2014
 

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#535 » by KingFox » Wed Mar 8, 2023 3:09 am

Surprised this thread is still open
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,859
And1: 13,153
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#536 » by eyeatoma » Wed Mar 8, 2023 3:12 am

The Sebastian Express wrote:
JDR720 wrote:
The Sebastian Express wrote:I know not a lot of people want to hear this on this board but you can actually see this in effect with the new discourse around the scratches and cuts on Jokic. And how there's now this idea that he doesn't get enough trips to the line despite the way he's all cut up.

But all players get cut up. Terribly so. As another person who is extremely, extremely, and I do mean extremely blindingly white - it's a lot easier to see cuts on white skin than it is on darker skin. But we never hear a real discourse around how cut up Joel Embiid, LeBron, etc may be as well.

This extends into other areas of athletes. I'm mean let's not be disingenuous and sit here and act like American media doesn't salivate at the possibility of a next great white hope athlete, especially in basketball. This is a real thing that happens. Maybe less so these days but it does linger, it does help shape the narrative.

This isn't to discount Jokic's accomplishments by any means, a remarkable talent. We can still recognize his greatness while acknowledging how the media might be more eager to praise him and what he's done and shower him with awards based on his appearance. That isn't an indictment of Jokic, it's an indictment of a media that's still heavily white covering American professional sports which are decidedly not.

The issue with that argument is those white media people still voted for black players the vast majority of the time. And many of those voters are black too, including most of the best known ones. Stephen A has a vote. Mike Wilbon has a vote. Chris Broussard has a vote. David Aldridge has a vote. Greg Anthony has a vote. Chris Herring has a vote. Jalen Rose has a vote. David Aldridge has a vote. Even Kendrick Perkins has a vote.

The NBA media voters are basically a cast of ESPN, SI and The Athletic media people.

Here is the list I found:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1KMzwRcilLDej0BWl7eYE_OYC9Tx9olI_Ptn-nHjKfpQ/htmlview


Your argument about the past MVPs over the last decade doesn't have a great deal of weight. Besides Jokic, out of the last ten years which white player was even on a level to be considered for an MVP vote? It's an inconclusive argument within the context of performance.

The argument is akin to saying "In a field of consisting of five different flavors of jolly ranchers as rated by competing candies, the lollipops also voted for the jolly ranchers rather than lollipops."

A silly example, yes, but to the point.

Thank you for the link. I don't think it had your intended effect.

I counted all the voters. There was only one voter who I didn't feel comfortable trying to determine their ethnicity, so I left him out. I believe I counted up everyone right, but:

Of the people (minus the one gentleman) in the link, if I didn't skip over anyone, there's 116 eligible voters for MVP.

62% are white.

Black players of 2021 make up 73% of the league.


Of the 58 votes (minus the one gentleman) who are on record about who they voted for:
38 are white.
20 are People of Color.

39 of those votes were for Jokic.
26 were white media members, which is 68% of the white vote.
13 were from PoC media members, which is 65% of the PoC vote.

I'd like to see the shift in those numbers for the full account of votes, but this link didn't have who everyone voted for, since it seemed to be primarily going off information provided by those voters on twitter/articles/interviews.


But the real number is the first one listed, which again:

62% of the voting body in the link provided is white.

73% of the players in the league are Black.

Just because the NBA is better about some stuff than the NFl, NHL, MLB doesn't mean it doesn't have room to improve. Getting more diversity in front offices, in local reporting, these are just important first steps. Some of you may not like how eyeatoma is bringing their message across, but the message isn't wrong.

I'll bring up a story Greg Oden told after his playing days were over about his time in Portland, which may not seem relevant but to me it is. He said it was difficult for him to be in Portland because he was a young Black man in a city, a state, which is incredibly white. It's isolating. It's depressing. You don't see many, if any, people who look like you on a daily basis. It's hard to do and hard to feel comfortable and connect.

I brought this up because I want you all to think about how many teams are in heavily white cities. But made up of mostly Black players. But they're covered by majority, if not completely, local white reporters (for example I'm not sure if Portland currently has anyone covering the team from any of the state's major to minor publications who is Black. I think they all might be white at this time). Now take this to a wider scope and remember those numbers above. 62% of the voting body is white. On a national scale, how many media members reflecting and talking about the NBA on 'debate' shows, on the radio, are white compared to media members of color? How many local reporters being brought on to those shows are white reporters compared to reporters of color?

How do our own lived experiences, perceptions and prejudices influence how we write and report about players who look vastly different than us? Who grew up different than us? Who deal with incidents in life that we will never encounter and imagine? And how do we create and spread those narratives on a local and national scale?

Because while he is at the center of this thread and topic, again this isn't truly about Jokic. He's a great player. It's in truth about the media and in some way also fans. How the league is covered, who it is covered by, and what certain media members and fans want to come to pass.

Something little to think about that maybe doesn't mean a lot to some people, but maybe it'll get you asking some questions about how the game is covered:
How many Black athletes are described as articulate by white reporters?
How many white athletes are described as articulate by white reporters?


So well said. This is essentially my point. Thank you for putting it so eloquently.
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,859
And1: 13,153
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#537 » by eyeatoma » Wed Mar 8, 2023 3:12 am

KingFox wrote:Surprised this thread is still open


Why, is it that hard to deal with these sorts of issues? It's the same thing going on in America and much of the world.
Ugalde
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,030
And1: 3,265
Joined: Jul 20, 2010
Location: Schenectady, NY
         

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#538 » by Ugalde » Wed Mar 8, 2023 3:13 am

i can’t keep up anymore? i thought black people couldnt be racist because of lack of power or something like that? the rules change so often it’s hard to keep up.
politics
to many 3s
HotRocks34
RealGM
Posts: 17,198
And1: 21,129
Joined: Jun 23, 2007

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#539 » by HotRocks34 » Wed Mar 8, 2023 3:15 am

The Sebastian Express wrote:Because while he is at the center of this thread and topic, again this isn't truly about Jokic. He's a great player. It's in truth about the media and in some way also fans. How the league is covered, who it is covered by, and what certain media members and fans want to come to pass.

Something little to think about that maybe doesn't mean a lot to some people, but maybe it'll get you asking some questions about how the game is covered:
How many Black athletes are described as articulate by white reporters?
How many white athletes are described as articulate by white reporters?



We went though a similar discourse last year when Jokic won his second MVP. To such an extent that I actually tried to track ESPN (anti-Jokic) and black journalist MVP votes as best I could. Here's what I got.

viewtopic.php?p=98318268#p98318268

ESPN ------------------------------------------------------------> 5 firsts for Jokic so far, 5 for Embiid, 1 for Giannis..........5/5/1
Black journalists (unofficial; think this correct) ---------> 7 firsts for Jokic, 5 for Embiid, 1 for Giannis.................7/5/1

List of black journalists/personalities I'm including here (see spreadsheet; please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong here with additions/subtractions):

Chris Herring (Jokic); Jalen Rose (Jokic); Chris Broussard (Giannis); Greg Anthony (Embiid); James Edwards (Jokic);
Stephen A Smith (Embiid); Mike Wilbon (Embiid); David Aldridge (Jokic); Gary Washburn (Embiid);
Michael Wright (Jokic); Taylor Rooks (Jokic); Kendrick Perkins (Embiid); Chris Kirschner (Jokic)

Every other sub-group of voters (for example, foreign journalists) has leaned heavily towards Jokic.



We all know ESPN isn't high on Jokic. Yet they still had him tied (in first-place votes) with Embiid. And black journalists had Jokic ahead.

Not sure if that is what the black journalists "want(ed) to come to pass", but that's how they voted.

Maybe they just thought Jokic deserved the award?
Jokic 31/21/22
Luka & Oscar = 5 x 27/8/8
The Brodie = All-out energy
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,665
And1: 20,262
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: Kendrick Perkins controversial comments on Jokic. Update: JJ Redick goes off on Perk about racism 

Post#540 » by MrBigShot » Wed Mar 8, 2023 3:22 am

This is one of the most embarrassing realgm threads (the replies) i've ever read and that's saying something, because there have been a lot of wild ones.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James

Return to The General Board