76ciology wrote:
Im talking about points per possession.
Let’s say Harden averages 1.00 ppp on ISO.
Let’s say Jaden McDaniels have a dfg% of -5% (he’s nowhere near that), then that’s .95 ppp on ISO.
And if Tobi can only have a dfg% of 0%, then that’s .05 points per possession difference.
This example doesn't make sense, are you saying Jaden guards Harden? why McDaniels having a dfg& of -5% would decrease Harden? also, how many possessions is Harden taking an ISO? why would McDaniels effect on his ISO be flat on the total?
76ciology wrote:Points per 100 depends on a lot of factors than individual defense. For instance Jalen McDaniels has 118 DRtg that is compared to Niang at 109 DRtg, do you then buy to the narrative that Niang is way better on defense than McDaniels?
You can’t just sub guys and think the team will be better on defense, our best 5 man unit generates 107 DRtg and this involves Tucker and Tobi.
Yes, which is why i talked about lineups and optimized defense, you went with individual impact.
76ciology wrote:While on the other hand there’s a big difference between a 40% shooter on 3 (1.2 EV) and a 30% shooter on 3 (.9 EV)
Its .3 vs .05
A guy who is neutral on defense with 40% 3pt shooter is much better down the stretch than an elite defender with 30% 3pt shooting.
This is relative to frequency. Your past example was bad, but if Harden ISO 30% of the time and your "neutral defender" take 5% of the available shots then the difference is a lot smaller than wnat you're saying.
More over, that "neutral defender" efficiency is related to volume so if you reduce Harden ISO PPP, that could probably scalate to the shooter because he needs to takes more shots so the defense rotates to him more usually making Harden probailities to ISO more easy.
As a result the PPP of the "neutral defender" goes down too. This is why spacing matters in offense too.
76ciology wrote:This is why since Morey took over. We never really bought into these “we need lengthy swingman” approach.
We just traded for McDaniels
