Kobblehead wrote:I agree that guys like Doncic and Embiid are more talented than Tatum, but that doesn't mean anything until those guys start to match his accomplishments.
Doncic or Embiid have to get to a Finals to get on Tatum's and Booker's level. And win one to surpass him and get on Giannis' level.
Right now, Tatum and Booker are superior to the rest of the under 30 guys because they got their team to a Finals.
You replied to quick. I actually have deleted my reply
Anyway, that is subjective.
If Embiid plays for the Suns, while Booker plays for the Sixers. And if Doncic plays for the Celtics, while Tatum plays for the Mavs. Then its very likely to almost certain that Tatum and Booker wouldnt have made it to the finals.
Im discussing Tatum as a player. Specifically, Tatum’s scoring.
Where when i dig into Tatum’s numbers there are some things that stands out.
He’s average to bad on mid range shooter
He’s average to bad 3pt shooter
He’s average to bad scorer on crunch time
He’s average to bad scorer in FG% on ISO
Among top scorers he has high% of shots in garbage time and low on clutch.
I just dont see him as someone like Embiid, Doncic and Giannis where they command double teams because they’re a mismatch on 90+% of defenders.
Now, if you look at his defensive numbers, it’s also surprising that he has been average to bad on defense.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.