RookieStar wrote:Have you not been reading the latest? Supposedly UTA is willing to go 4yrs/95m which the Lakers will match. 3/60 is a bargain
I love this stories on "undrafted player signed >25M year contract".
Moderators: Howard Mass, UCF, Knightro, Def Swami, ChosenSavior, UCFJayBird
RookieStar wrote:Have you not been reading the latest? Supposedly UTA is willing to go 4yrs/95m which the Lakers will match. 3/60 is a bargain

eyriq wrote:Reaves passes the eye test. He has great body and ball control and is very skilled.
RichCollab wrote:eyriq wrote:Reaves passes the eye test. He has great body and ball control and is very skilled.
I need more volume from 3. I don’t think he is going to add the floor spacing we need.

drsd wrote:RookieStar wrote:Have you not been reading the latest? Supposedly UTA is willing to go 4yrs/95m which the Lakers will match. 3/60 is a bargain
I love this stories on "undrafted player signed >25M year contract".
Petre1978 wrote:The Magic should sign him
tiderulz wrote:Petre1978 wrote:The Magic should sign him
I'm sure he will have plenty of offers. The question will be, why should he choose Orlando

Bensational wrote:I can’t tell if he’ll go on to be Tyler Herro or Duncan Robinson. He’s peaked just in time for his contract though so good for him.

RookieStar wrote:Bensational wrote:I can’t tell if he’ll go on to be Tyler Herro or Duncan Robinson. He’s peaked just in time for his contract though so good for him.
We need to know his work ethic. Is it just "contract-year" performance or does this kid do the work?
To me, the difference between guys like Duncan Robinson and say.... JJ Redick is that one listens to coaches, does his work, always be ready and became a starting SG to the showtime/lob city Clips while the other is thought of as an anchor dragging a team down with his contract/performance ratio.
Bensational wrote:RookieStar wrote:Bensational wrote:I can’t tell if he’ll go on to be Tyler Herro or Duncan Robinson. He’s peaked just in time for his contract though so good for him.
We need to know his work ethic. Is it just "contract-year" performance or does this kid do the work?
To me, the difference between guys like Duncan Robinson and say.... JJ Redick is that one listens to coaches, does his work, always be ready and became a starting SG to the showtime/lob city Clips while the other is thought of as an anchor dragging a team down with his contract/performance ratio.
I don’t think it’s to do with work ethic. Duncan Robinson doesn’t seem like the mail-it-in type. He’s just one dimensional and when his shot wasn’t falling he offered little else. He was paid a premium because his shot had been falling in Miami’s finals run.
Reaves already shows more variety in his game. He can get to the FT line and isn’t a sieve on defense.
Personally I’d prefer to keep Harris but increase Suggs’ role. I’d like to commit to internal development one more season.
pepe1991 wrote:I just don't see it with Reaves. I see mediocre all around player that plays with 3 allstars, two of them being top 10 players ( one in conversation for best ever, other is one of best defenders in past 15 years) and gets incredible amount of BS calls in his favor.
I really don't think he is any better player than some Bogdan Bogdanovic or Huerter or Monk or Norman Powell.
I think that he will cost a lot and after he gets not- Lakers officiating and is on no- Lebron -Davis team, you will ask yourself "why are we burning money on average bench player ?"
Yes ,he shoots 40% for 3. But look at splits.
148 out of 216 threes he took were wide open. Additional 56 were open. So he had clean looks on 204/216 threes.
This is Lebron/Davis now Russell effect. Nobody is going out of his way to prevent Austin Reaves from scoring, he is every game guarded by worst defender other team has to offer.
tiderulz wrote:I'm sure he will have plenty of offers. The question will be, why should he choose Orlando
