
So here's my internal (now external) debate - do we have enough quality prospects and keep our vets, or do we try for another in this draft?
Followup question - how far, without trading away our young core, could we move up using our 2nd + whatever?
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
theBigLip wrote:Going crazylooking at mock drafts. even crazier is before the lottery. But 2nd rounders and non lottery picks are not changing. Looking at guys in the 20-30 range and thinking if we throw in a 2nd plus something (Bogdonovich, Burks, Bagley?), we could move into the late first round. Not sure what the trade is, but then I starting asking myself if that's even what we want to do.
So here's my internal (now external) debate - do we have enough quality prospects and keep our vets, or do we try for another in this draft?
Followup question - how far, without trading away our young core, could we move up using our 2nd + whatever?
vege wrote:We should do a trade using #31. I posted a few times in other threads, #31 + Killian Hayes (add future 2nds if needed) for Royce O'Neale for example.
We have enough bad prospects alread, we don't need any more of those. We don't need to add another Saben Lee for example.
theBigLip wrote:vege wrote:We should do a trade using #31. I posted a few times in other threads, #31 + Killian Hayes (add future 2nds if needed) for Royce O'Neale for example.
We have enough bad prospects alread, we don't need any more of those. We don't need to add another Saben Lee for example.
Not sure if Bagley is a positive asset or notBut if he is, and since he seems to be the odd man out now that we have Wiseman, maybe Bagley + 2nd and get into the high 20s? I'm guessing Hayes is perceived as negative, so not sure what we get without adding the extra picks as you mentioned.
I'm hoping we could do better than Saben Lee. But if we could get a serviceable player as you mentioned, that's probably the smarter move, which I guess answers my question. Of course, we don't know what trades are really available.
theBigLip wrote: Of course, we don't know what trades are really available.
bstein14 wrote:I do feel like we need another respected "culture change" defensive minded "vet"... it doesn't really have to be an older player just someone off their rookie deal with at least 4-5 years in the league that will lead by example with defensive effort and will also not accept guys going half ass on defense. I don't think we need Draymond, but we need someone who will help a new coach shift our defense from horrible to at least close to average.
theBigLip wrote:Going crazylooking at mock drafts. even crazier is before the lottery. But 2nd rounders and non lottery picks are not changing. Looking at guys in the 20-30 range and thinking if we throw in a 2nd plus something (Bogdonovich, Burks, Bagley?), we could move into the late first round. Not sure what the trade is, but then I starting asking myself if that's even what we want to do.
So here's my internal (now external) debate - do we have enough quality prospects and keep our vets, or do we try for another in this draft?
Followup question - how far, without trading away our young core, could we move up using our 2nd + whatever?
bstein14 wrote:I do feel like we need another respected "culture change" defensive minded "vet"... it doesn't really have to be an older player just someone off their rookie deal with at least 4-5 years in the league that will lead by example with defensive effort and will also not accept guys going half ass on defense. I don't think we need Draymond, but we need someone who will help a new coach shift our defense from horrible to at least close to average.
vege wrote:Miami Out: Duncan Robinson / Nikola Jovic / #18
Miami In: John Collins / #31 / future 2nds from Detroit
They get an upgrade in a position of need
Atlanta Out: John Collins
Atlanta In: Marvin Bagley / Nikola Jovic
they get out of the LT
Detroit Out: Marvin Bagley / #31 / future 2nds
Detroit In: Duncan Robinson / #18
We get #18 for #31 and for taking on Robinson's extra year and extra money. I am not sure if future 2nds are needed but I added them just in case.
theBigLip wrote:Going crazylooking at mock drafts. even crazier is before the lottery. But 2nd rounders and non lottery picks are not changing. Looking at guys in the 20-30 range and thinking if we throw in a 2nd plus something (Bogdonovich, Burks, Bagley?), we could move into the late first round. Not sure what the trade is, but then I starting asking myself if that's even what we want to do.
Manocad wrote:Don't undersell the tanking effect. If the players know the goal is to tank they're likely not going to be out there busting ass 110% on defense; that will be the first thing they'll lighten up on. Get your points and keep your stats looking respectable but since the goal is to tank, take it easy on the defensive effort.
But guys like Ivey and Bagley who certainly have the athletic ability to play good defense but get called out for bad defense? Maybe they weren't trying to play high level defense given the goal is to tank. Plus Ivey is a rookie to boot, so there's that.
It's contradiction. You can't expect a tank but also expect every player to perform at their own personal high level both offensively AND defensively all the time. That WINS games.
vege wrote:Miami Out: Duncan Robinson / Nikola Jovic / #18
Miami In: John Collins / #31 / future 2nds from Detroit
They get an upgrade in a position of need
Atlanta Out: John Collins
Atlanta In: Marvin Bagley / Nikola Jovic
they get out of the LT
Detroit Out: Marvin Bagley / #31 / future 2nds
Detroit In: Duncan Robinson / #18
We get #18 for #31 and for taking on Robinson's extra year and extra money. I am not sure if future 2nds are needed but I added them just in case.
Manocad wrote:If Weaver is shrewd enough he could probably turn Cade, Ivey, Duren, Stew, Bojan, Bagley and Wiseman into enough first round picks that the Pistons could start five 18-19 year old rookies next year plus have a couple more on the bench. The team can't keep placing its faith in old players.
I was actually discussing this with my brother last night.theBigLip wrote:Going crazylooking at mock drafts. even crazier is before the lottery. But 2nd rounders and non lottery picks are not changing. Looking at guys in the 20-30 range and thinking if we throw in a 2nd plus something (Bogdonovich, Burks, Bagley?), we could move into the late first round. Not sure what the trade is, but then I starting asking myself if that's even what we want to do.
So here's my internal (now external) debate - do we have enough quality prospects and keep our vets, or do we try for another in this draft?
Followup question - how far, without trading away our young core, could we move up using our 2nd + whatever?