ATLTimekeeper wrote:REJECTEDBYCLARK wrote:Of course but nobody believes they're drafting blindly and so many other factors go into the success of a player such as the team and development system they end up in. I am certain that if we looked deep enough we could find another set of statistics which would overwhelmingly point to Bufkin likely being successful (regardless of the outcome) which hold equal if not greater weight than stats regarding the difference between 6'4 and 6'5 players and their success. There are so many models to analyze and I know that Bufkin graded quite high for instance with Cerebro Sports in the C-Ram index.
Sure you can keep looking. Success could be Immanual Quickley. At 13 I would want more. I doubt there's a model out there that would tell you any player is for sure going to be a star, because then the draft would be highly efficient. Every team has people modelling the draft.
I think you mean to say you want to go with someone with higher
probability of being an all-star caliber player based on your own BPM relative to height model at 13.
This isn't a draft with anyone backed up by stats like that who is projected to be available anyway. Believe me if there were a 6'5+ freshman guard who had a 48%+ FG like Bufkin who got to the line 6-7 times a game and had a good FT% and 2+ steals per 36, etc...etc.. I would be all over them instead.
If BPM means a lot to you then Marcus Sasser is the play. Even if you account for level of competition and left NSJ, JHS, Keyonte, Jett, Terquavion and others in college for another 2-3 years, it is highly unlikely that they would reach Sasser's productivity as defined by the BPM stat.