homecourtloss wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:A bit of everything for everyone in this thread, so I can see this discussion continuing right up to the next game. Have fun internet!!!
- Curry shot poorly... missed some big shots at the end... and made a really stupid TO with 5 seconds left.
... AND...
- Curry went for 31 / 10 / 14 with 3 steals and only 2 TOs. Almost any Warriors successful possession when through him whether it was from him scoring, or on an assist, or on a hockey assist.
How was the FT disparity in this game? Historic?
I think a lot of people get confused about the Lakers FTA differential.
The rarity of the Lakers dominance is not about any one game. It's that they've held an advantage from the line in 40 of the past 43 games, which comes out at a historic FTA differential rate. One game might be +8 like last night. Another might be +20 like Game 3. Or even +4. Or whatever.
But at the end of the day... the Lakers have figured out a game plan to get fouled more than other teams and more importantly put their opponents on the line less than other teams in virtually every single game since February, shortly after getting screwed by a bad call vs. Boston.
For example, even though GSW was #30 in the league in FTA this season... they shot 20.3 FTA per game. Even though Sacramento was #2 in FTA differential (+2.1) behind the Lakers... the Warriors shot 25.1 FTA in Round 1.
The Warriors are shooting only 12.5 FTAs this series vs. LAL. The Lakers are just better than any other team (maybe ever) at not fouling.
They're going to win the NBA title... and it'll be in part because of their free throw dominance.