EvanZ wrote:The Moose wrote:I have Amen over Ausar as prospects still.
To my eye, whenever I watched full OTE games , Amen’s passing was definitely on a different level compared to Ausar. The numbers are the same but the ability to make reads and process plays at elite speed seemed much higher for Amen.
And I’m not sure how to quantify this, but Ausar seemed to benefit from playing with Amen far more than Amen benefitted from playing with Ausar.
Ausar really struggled in the half court as a scorer from anywhere, he was a zero level scorer. He shot 40% on layups in the half court , and had half the volume of Amen who made 50% of his. Amen had almost 2 times as many dunks in the half court. Overall Ausar was 51% at the rim in the half court, which is terrible considering his athletic gifts and the weak rim presence in the OTE.
Ultimately Amen MADE as many shots at the rim in the half court as Ausar attempted, while doing it a 10% better clip.
Amen’s ability to break down defenses and get to the rim in the half court is far superior, and bodes much better for a primary creator. He just has so much more creativity as a playmaker. Sometimes he goes overboard and refuses to make the simple pass, but I like the creativity.
Ausar shot 35% on low volume pull up 2’s and 29% on unguarded C&S 3’s. He actually shot higher on guarded c&s 3’s , which makes me think his final 3pt numbers are a little bit noisy. Bad free throw shooter.
My concern for Ausar is what does he actually do well on offense outside of transition play. Right now he doesn’t seem to bring anything in the half court offense as a scorer, aside from hopefully being an off ball cutter ala Hami Diallo. He’s a good connective passer for sure, but he hasn’t shown to be the type to break guys down off the dribble and be creative as a playmaker.
Truly hilarious take. They are identical twins with identical stats except Ausar shot better. Except
the way you talk about it Amen is a star and Ausar might be out of the league in two years.

lol come on, there is no need to be so pretentious and mischaracterise the discourse
I have never alluded to Amen as a star, or that Ausar would be out of the league in 2 years. I'm not all together that high on either. But even a guy like Hami just finished his 5th season and Ausar is better at just about everything and another planet as far as a connective passer. Ausar should find a place in the league just based off size, tools and a baseline of skills.
I would have Amen in the 6-10 range and Ausar 10-14. I think Amen has the potential to be a lead on ball guy unlike Ausar, for the reasons outlined in my initial post, and thats why I would take a chance on Amen earlier.
If someone thinks Amen isn't capable of being a lead creator, then yes Ausar could end up being the better player and I could see why they would prefer Ausar.
Ausar is the better shooter obviously, but they are both currently non-shooters. Going back across 3 seasons of highschool + OTE (100+ game sample size) Amen is at 29% from 3, Ausar at 30% from 3, Amen 61% ft and Ausar 70%ft. This on 500+ free throw attempts.
These are absolutely non-shooter numbers regardless of Ausar being better. Assuming either one will become a good shooter is a big leap, and I wouldn't make it for either.
Feel free to address Ausar's massive deficiencies in attacking and finishing in the halfcourt in a bad league though, or the blatant differences between the two as PnR handlers. Or just hand wave 'muh identical pts/rebs/asts stats' with zero context, up to you.