DusterBuster wrote:zzaj wrote:JKiddy wrote:If it took Sharpe + 3 + filler to keep Dame would you do that? (just curious)
If you are looking for personal opinions based on being the hypothetical GM...mine would be no.
IMO, at this stage of Lillard's career and with that contract, Sharpe and #3 are going to be more important to the franchise from here on out. If it was keep Sharpe and #3 or keep Lillard, I'd wish Lillard all the best...
I get this thought, but I've also seen wayyyyy to many times fans go crazy over a player for showing out over the last few weeks of a bad season, only for that player to not make the leaps people think will happen. Love Sharpe's potential as well, and when looking back on players who did this previously, history would seem to lead that he will not be in the group of players who flopped in year 2... but nothing is for sure. So with that, if there is a game-changing level player like an Embiid or Giannis level that in some world the Blazers have a chance at, if Sharpe needs to be in that deal, so be it.
Well, yeah okay…I interpreted the question to be trades that are realistic. IMO, the Giannises, Doncics, Embiids of the world aren’t remotely realistic for #3/Simons/Filler. If the Lakers want to trade LeBron/Davis for that package, then I might hold out for Booker/Durant…
If Lillard said yes to a realistic trade like Siakam, Brown or ‘my way or the highway’, I’d pack his bags for him.
I’ve said it elsewhere, but I believe it’s imperative that the Blazers split #3 and Simons if they are looking to trade them. Their value together to the franchise is more than what they would reasonably return in a single player.