ImageImage

BrandHIM Miller: The Brandon Miller Thread

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,357
And1: 6,301
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#521 » by JMAC3 » Mon Jun 12, 2023 1:32 am

Miller can legitimately play 2-4 like Paul George.

He can playmake and shoot as a 2.
His natural 3 postion.
He has shown to be a really good rebounder too so the 4 is fine too.

I think him and Miles are a good pair of forwards defensively. Miles guards the beefier guys and Miller guards then lengthy guys. Doesn’t really matter who guards the 3/4. They both are interchangeable on both ends.
JustBuzzin
RealGM
Posts: 16,349
And1: 13,815
Joined: Jun 10, 2023
 

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#522 » by JustBuzzin » Mon Jun 12, 2023 1:52 am

JMAC3 wrote:Miller can legitimately play 2-4 like Paul George.

He can playmake and shoot as a 2.
His natural 3 postion.
He has shown to be a really good rebounder too so the 4 is fine too.

I think him and Miles are a good pair of forwards defensively. Miles guards the beefier guys and Miller guards then lengthy guys. Doesn’t really matter who guards the 3/4. They both are interchangeable on both ends.

So you think Miller is starting at sf and Bridges at pf?
User avatar
SWedd523
RealGM
Posts: 13,595
And1: 6,544
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#523 » by SWedd523 » Mon Jun 12, 2023 1:55 am

I don't think it matters which is which.
Image
wilson115
Starter
Posts: 2,470
And1: 1,653
Joined: Aug 21, 2020
 

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#524 » by wilson115 » Mon Jun 12, 2023 3:49 am

JMAC3 wrote:So he struggled 3 times in his first 33 games played. That is why people are freaking out lol. 9% of games

Liver_Pooty wrote:I'm still confused why anyone would point out a players struggles in certain games instead of judging them by the totality of a season. Jayson Tatum was horrible against teams like Elon and Maine his lone year at Duke and I don't recall anyone bringing that up

I'm confused myself. Pretty sure I meant their FG%s in all the games they played vs. top 50 teams when I posted these the first time. Wonder how those goalposts got there.

https://barttorvik.com/playerstat.php?year=2023&p=Brandon%20Miller&t=Alabama
https://barttorvik.com/playerstat.php?t=Duke&year=2017&p=Jayson+Tatum&cbarg=0&psort=OR
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 41,043
And1: 17,089
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#525 » by Liver_Pooty » Mon Jun 12, 2023 4:04 am

wilson115 wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:So he struggled 3 times in his first 33 games played. That is why people are freaking out lol. 9% of games

Liver_Pooty wrote:I'm still confused why anyone would point out a players struggles in certain games instead of judging them by the totality of a season. Jayson Tatum was horrible against teams like Elon and Maine his lone year at Duke and I don't recall anyone bringing that up

I'm confused myself. Pretty sure I meant their FG%s in all the games they played vs. top 50 teams when I posted these the first time. Wonder how those goalposts got there.

https://barttorvik.com/playerstat.php?year=2023&p=Brandon%20Miller&t=Alabama
https://barttorvik.com/playerstat.php?t=Duke&year=2017&p=Jayson+Tatum&cbarg=0&psort=OR


Yeah. I'm still confused. Explain it for someone stupid like me.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 41,043
And1: 17,089
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#526 » by Liver_Pooty » Mon Jun 12, 2023 4:08 am

I watched everyone of Jayson Tatums games at Duke and you can throw whatever stats you want at me, but Miller had a much better freshman season. I will not say Miller will be Tatum because that's foolish. But Miller had a better one year. Get out all your analytics.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
wilson115
Starter
Posts: 2,470
And1: 1,653
Joined: Aug 21, 2020
 

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#527 » by wilson115 » Mon Jun 12, 2023 4:12 am

Miller 2FG:
all teams: .483
vs top 50: .385

Tatum 2FG:
all: .504
t50: .506
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 41,043
And1: 17,089
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#528 » by Liver_Pooty » Mon Jun 12, 2023 4:15 am

wilson115 wrote:Miller 2FG:
all teams: .483
vs top 50: .385

Tatum 2FG:
all: .504
t50: .506


Are we just going to forget how Tatum barely made over one 3 a game in college and shot 33 or 34 percent or whatever or is shooting the three suddenly a lost art now?
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 41,043
And1: 17,089
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#529 » by Liver_Pooty » Mon Jun 12, 2023 4:24 am

Miller was by far a better college player than Tatum. Its not even close. Will he be a better pro? Hell no.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
wilson115
Starter
Posts: 2,470
And1: 1,653
Joined: Aug 21, 2020
 

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#530 » by wilson115 » Mon Jun 12, 2023 8:57 am

Liver_Pooty wrote:Are we just going to forget how Tatum barely made over one 3 a game in college and shot 33 or 34 percent or whatever or is shooting the three suddenly a lost art now?

Then became a near 40% shooter from three on 7-8 attempts per in the NBA. So the question some of us are trying to answer: which skill's easier to picture a prospect improving on once an NBA player development staff gets their hands on them, three-point shooting or getting to the rack consistently?



wilson115 wrote:Little more context:
AT THE RIM
85-147 57.8%
https://barttorvik.com/playerstat.php?year=2023&p=Brandon%20Miller&t=Alabama

According to Synergy Sports, Miller was 33-43 (76.7%) on his transition rim attempts this year and only 33-84 (39.3%) in the half-court. Yes, 39% at the rim in the half-court, with only 3 dunks. Fewer than 14% of his overall field goal attempts were taken at the bucket — and that comes in one of the best-spaced offenses in college basketball under Nate Oats.

https://theboxandone.substack.com/p/brandon-miller-2023-nba-draft-scouting
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,321
And1: 45,968
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#531 » by JDR720 » Mon Jun 12, 2023 11:06 am

Tatum had 8 college games when he shot under 40% overall. Miller had 14, including two when he had 0 made shots.

As far as 2pt shots go, Miller had 17 games when he shot 40% of worse. Tatum had 11.

Tatum shot 50% from 2 overall. Miller shot 48%.

In over half his games, Miller made 2 or fewer 2pt shots.

In his best 5 games from 2pt range (number of makes). They were against SC (terrible team), Arkansas, Gonzaga (bad defense) and Longwood (don't know who they are) and Vanderbilt.
User avatar
amcoolio
Hornets Forum John Hancock
Posts: 17,840
And1: 10,179
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Location: Servant to lord Bargnani
   

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#532 » by amcoolio » Mon Jun 12, 2023 12:50 pm

Liver_Pooty wrote:
wilson115 wrote:Miller 2FG:
all teams: .483
vs top 50: .385

Tatum 2FG:
all: .504
t50: .506


Are we just going to forget how Tatum barely made over one 3 a game in college and shot 33 or 34 percent or whatever or is shooting the three suddenly a lost art now?


Damn that’s a good argument for Scoot lol
Bassman
Head Coach
Posts: 6,107
And1: 2,135
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Bye FL back to MO; NC born & bred
       

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#533 » by Bassman » Mon Jun 12, 2023 1:07 pm

Somebody tell me how a 6-9 athletic player who has a smooth, quality form jump shot already is NOT going to get even better with complete focus on his game from professional coaching?

All this talk about Miller’s lesser games, or lower percentage shooting against top teams, just reinforces that this is a young man who will need to grow and strengthen to overcome such challenges. Tatum actually IS a good example of progression from a skinny young talent who grew into an all star. Scoot starts from a worse base relative to shooting percentage, finishing ability, etc.
I continue to wait...and hope...for the return to Hornet's glory.
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,321
And1: 45,968
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#534 » by JDR720 » Mon Jun 12, 2023 1:20 pm

Bassman wrote:Somebody tell me how a 6-9 athletic player who has a smooth, quality form jump shot already is NOT going to get even better with complete focus on his game from professional coaching?

All this talk about Miller’s lesser games, or lower percentage shooting against top teams, just reinforces that this is a young man who will need to grow and strengthen to overcome such challenges. Tatum actually IS a good example of progression from a skinny young talent who grew into an all star. Scoot starts from a worse base relative to shooting percentage, finishing ability, etc.

We aren't saying he won't improve, we're saying he struggles against good competition. Struggles inside the arc and so on. The majority, if not almost all of the Scoot fans, would be fine if Miller was the pick.

Some of the same augments people make against Scoot, people ignore when they apply to Miller.
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,321
And1: 45,968
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#535 » by JDR720 » Mon Jun 12, 2023 1:43 pm

User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,457
And1: 16,005
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#536 » by fatlever » Mon Jun 12, 2023 4:48 pm

Miller is in town

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,457
And1: 16,005
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#537 » by fatlever » Mon Jun 12, 2023 4:51 pm

What conclusions can we draw from those two shot charts? Does anything stand out?

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
SWedd523
RealGM
Posts: 13,595
And1: 6,544
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#538 » by SWedd523 » Mon Jun 12, 2023 5:14 pm

College has less spacing
One was way more perimeter oriented than the other
One was a clear score first, first option guy and the other was a PG
One was a better ball handler so was able to get into the paint easier

They play two completely different styles of ball and have completely different roles.

There really isn't any way to compare the two head to head
Image
Giddf
Freshman
Posts: 53
And1: 17
Joined: Sep 14, 2021
 

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#539 » by Giddf » Mon Jun 12, 2023 5:54 pm

SWedd523 wrote:College has less spacing
One was way more perimeter oriented than the other
One was a clear score first, first option guy and the other was a PG
One was a better ball handler so was able to get into the paint easier

They play two completely different styles of ball and have completely different roles.

There really isn't any way to compare the two head to head
https://imgur.com/a/97S8Phx

Compared the same playtypes between the two. Scoot had a lot less spacing. Alabama ran a very modern offensive scheme for College basketball. Nate Oats 5-out offense which maximizes spacing. So a lot of times Miller had what looked very similar to NBA spacing.

Scoot was routinely loaded up on as his teammates could not shoot or reliably handle the ball. There are defenders sagged 10+ feet off the wings and corners just to help on Scoots drive.
User avatar
SWedd523
RealGM
Posts: 13,595
And1: 6,544
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: The Brandon Miller Thread 

Post#540 » by SWedd523 » Mon Jun 12, 2023 6:06 pm

So now the G League has less spacing and a worse supporting cast than Alabama?
Image

Return to Charlotte Hornets