TimberKat wrote:thinktank wrote:Wolves fans can’t even admit that Towns is a C playing PF.
Amazing.
Dieng was backup C to Towns, btw.
Klomp wrote:Towns was actually used as the PF in lineups next to Dieng, Gibson and Vanderbilt so this past season wasn't really all that different for him.
Towns did not play PF next to Vandy. Or Gibson. With Dieng, they didn’t share the floor very much.
Quote from Towns :"The last time I had something like this, obviously I had Gorgui Dieng, I played [power forward] a lot of years in the NBA. Fans forgot that. It's OK," Towns told CBS Sports. "And go back to me in college. This is how I played in college. Willie Cauley-Stein is like 7-2. I don't know what they're missing in that."
Not saying Wolves played "a lot" that way but Towns does play pfd.
https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/karl-anthony-towns-eager-to-sacrifice-to-deliver-wolves-a-title-because-hes-been-doing-it-his-whole-life/
If Towns is a natural PF then why is the article titled “ Karl-Anthony Towns eager to sacrifice…”? A better title, under your argument, would’ve been something like “Towns happy to move back to PF”.
He plays some PF, but he’s a natural C, just like Miles Turner, to bring it back on topic.
My guess is that Towns will ultimately play out the rest of his career as a C, where he is best used to naturally stretch the defensive C out to the perimeter with his shooting, or drive right by him to the rim. Verses having his ballhandling advantage be taken away by PFs in the playoffs (because they’re quicker and can afford to get in Towns jock all the way out to the perimeter).
There’s a reason most of the bball watching public doesn’t think our two big lineup will work (Towns isn’t a natural PF). The group think, Vegas, etc. could be wrong. So far, they have not been wrong. It’s very difficult for a team to win consistently above .500 with a top ranked defense and a bottom ranked offense.
