lessthanjake wrote:Gibson22 wrote:iggymcfrack wrote:Wanted to make sure to get a voting post in even if it might not be quite as in-depth as I had planned.
Vote: Steph Curry
I still have him as the GOAT PG. Offense-only, it's really hard to tell between him and Magic. Magic led better regular season offenses, and they led pretty similar offenses in the playoffs, but Steph did it in a tougher era and probably with slightly worse teammates on average. The post Durant years have probably all had worse league adjusted talent on offense than what Magic played with and the peak offenses even before Durant came on board were better than the peak Lakers' offenses all-around.
Ultimately, the differentiator is their defense. With years of data and observation, I feel that Curry is at absolute worst a league average defender, and probably a little above average. Meanwhile, Magic is almost universally regarded as a poor defender with the range being from a little below average to downright being a liability. This is extremely notable since usually legendary offensive players who win titles get a little bit of the benefit of the doubt with their defensive reputation with Kobe being a prime example as he was winning all-defense awards in years where he was actually one of the worst defensive guards in the entire NBA.
Alternate: Magic Johnson
Nomination: David Robinson
Absolute beast on both ends. Ranks 6th all-time in PER with 2 of the players ahead of him (Joker and AD) being guys who haven't hit their decline phase yet. 5th all-time in BPM and 2nd all-time in WS/48. Absolutely legendary defender who joined a below average defense as a rookie that would rank last in the league the year he was injured and led them to ranks of 3rd, 1st, 1st, 10th, 9th, 5th, and 3rd in the interim. Had 5 relatively prime years in the databall era (age 31-35) and over that period, he had an on/off of +6.1 in the regular season and +27.4 in the playoffs over that period. I think he was a better player than Bill Russell and I'll die on that hill.
Mhh, I think that basing your decision for curry over magic on defense is a bit meh, defining curry as "at absolute worst a league average defender" is a bit too much, he's someone who has had years where he was below average and season where he was average or slightly above average (starting pg defender), but also because he's mostly always been in a great defensive system with great defenders aroudn him, I mean he's still always kind of a liability. And magic was a bad defender but for 6'8, like, bad for a big wing, not for a pg. Like, I think that magic's defense at 6'8" was still better than a respectable average size defender, not of an elite one but I'd say, significantly better than curry's. It's the usual thing, people tend to judge compared to what a player could do. not compared to like an average player.
What’s the evidence that Curry was a below average defender? Some factual information on this: When teams tried to hunt him in the playoffs, it generally worked quite badly for them offensively. Relatedly, out of all Warriors players that got significant minutes in those four finals against the Cavaliers, the Cavaliers’ FG% was the lowest when Steph Curry was the closest defender. The Warriors have had really great defenses in general, including in the playoffs—which is actually quite difficult to do in the NBA these days if you have a bad defender, because teams will just exploit that person every time down court (offenses these days are kind of only as good as their lowest common denominator). Complex measures like EPM and RAPTOR tend to have Steph as, on average, a slightly above average defender. Indeed, EPM lists percentiles, and in the last decade (excluding 2019-2020), Steph averaged being just below the 70th percentile as a defender, and only one season was below the 50th percentile (2020-2021). He even had a season above the 90th percentile (2021-2022)! In the last decade in regular season + playoffs, the Warriors offense gets better with Steph on the floor, even if you control for whether Draymond is on (if Draymond is off, the defensive rating is 3.7 better if Steph is on, and if Draymond is on, then it is 0.9 better if Steph is on too).
I don’t think anyone would say Steph is an incredible defender, but I think the evidence suggests that he’s an above-average one, and I think it’d be hard to really make a good case that he’s below average.
Also not sure where Bird(very clearly not on Steph's level offensively by literally any evidence besides "1980 turnaround") is being assumed as a much better defender:
Bird really shouldn't be considered here for anyone whose criteria doesn't center strongly on MVP voting