pepe1991 wrote:Weren't NBA teams donating to BLM to find out Patrisse Cullors was using that money to buy herself house and did withdrawal of money by paying own brothers for "security and intelectual services" while in same time supporting crime /looting?
https://thehill.com/changing-america/respect/diversity-inclusion/510894-nba-team-owners-to-donate-300-million-to-black/
Not exactly. Setting up a foundation with money going to charities and HBCUs to help with economic growth, opportunities, educations in inner cities, etc. Not donating to BLM itself.
It's also not a political statement at its core. The original support was because of what most people left or right could agree was the use of excessive force on an unarmed person - the protests would've happened if the cop was Republican, Democrat, or Independent.
pepe1991 wrote:Once you tangle yourself into political BS it becomes two way steet.
Most sports leagues are apolitical - it's all for $$$. NBA has $10 billion invested in China.. the same reason why most politicians are the same way. The Saudis, China, Russia, Ukraine, even America and things like the Iraq War.. people are always going to turn a blind eye to injustice elsewhere if it means being in decent standing with a country that you benefit from.
It's the players who really decide where to be politically conscientious or not - and many of them are mainly focused on domestic issues that affect their own ethnicity, which isn't a huge shocker.
Regardless, donating from your team is still stupid as hell. In the end it may not do any damage, but it doesn't help, and only could turn players off.. and that's whether your owner is left-leaning with a team full of conservatives or whether he's right-leaning with more liberals.





















