Raps in 4 wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:
Any time you lose an all-star for nothing, while not replacing his production (or going in the other direction and bottoming out), you've had a **** offseason.
Paying VV 40 million wouldn't have made this a **** offseason.
Schroder is a solid value replacement at the MLE.
Of course paying FVV $40 million would have been dumb. The right move was to trade him before he became a FA. Letting an asset walk is always terrible asset management.
I thought we were talking about this offseason? Unless I'm not reading it correctly, the poll wasn't who had the worst calendar year or trade deadline.
Anyways, trading him for the trash that was offered at the deadline wouldn't have made any meaningful difference to the present or the future of this team. They spent his money on a reasonably priced replacement (Schroder) and a young guy with potential (McDaniels). Hardly a disaster, unless you think VV will be a allstar this year and deserving of the contract he received.