Tha Cynic wrote:JB7 wrote:JRoy wrote:
Too soon to tell.
Apparently Jrue will be moved soon and who knows what that return will look like.
I’m not a Scoot fan, I’m not an Ayton fan but I have to lay aside my reservations and give them the chance to prove me wrong.
Looking forward to Sharpe in a bigger role.
Glad it is almost over. Ready for something besides swatting down bad trade ideas.
Transition to dissecting horrible trades now?
Honestly, the only conclusion I can come up with on this deal for the Blazers is they were ‘gifted’ the 3rd pick in the draft and Scoot by the NBA, so that they could gift Dame to the Bucks.
A Dame & Giannis pairing is great for the league for the next year or two.
Yeah, based on everything JRoy has said he would have easily turned this trade down if we suggested it. He's most likely unhappy with the value but hoping things turn out well. When you turn down OG and end up with 33 year old Jrue Holiday instead in proposals, it's not something you're going to be happy with. The Blazers basically gave Dame away to Milwaukee though they may be in for a nice haul in 5 seasons..
I really don’t like the trading of picks as the main piece in any deal. Horrible for both teams. Outside of possibly the Celtics/Nets big deal years back that brought Garnett and Pierce to the Nets (which was kind of unheard of then and the first big transfer of picks) and ended up with Celtics drafting Jaylen Brown with one of the picks I believe, really most of these picks transferred don’t end up being anywhere near equal value of the player going out. Reason is the team that has traded the picks now has no incentive to lose, and therefore does everything they can to win.
That is also why it is so bad for the teams trading the picks, because sometimes a 1 or 2 year tank to acquire young assets can be a good thing.
Part of the parity in the league now could be attributed to all of these teams trading their picks, removing the incentive to lose in certain seasons.
I think the reason most GM’s revert to trading picks is it shelters them from criticism of the deal, because the end results of the picks will be unknown for years. So typically the picks get talked about in the best potential scenario, rather than the worst, which the picks lean towards most of the time.
I was arguing this earlier, and even Bill Simmons mentioned it on his podcast. I think this is a two year trial for competing, and then the Bucks will trade Giannis. Bill was even speculating it could be a one year run, and then they blow it up, and the reason is the picks. The Bucks have no incentive to be bad in those years, and while Giannis will still be good and just turning 30, the rest of the team around him will probably be done, with little room to maneuver to get better. So the simple solution is trade Giannis for a massive haul and rebuild quickly on the fly. And the team sitting on the most assets is easily OKC.
So by the time these picks transfer, they will probably not be in the lottery.