ImageImageImageImageImage

Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,291
And1: 22,805
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#181 » by RHODEY » Mon Nov 6, 2023 9:30 pm

HighRyzer83 wrote:
ohboy109 wrote:
Snacks wrote:
Nobody wants KAT.
We're Knick fans and this is hell. We have to make a choice between horrible things we really don't want.



Nobody wants randle's low iq a** u crazy

Yeah I don't understand why there's any comparison between the two. Kat sucks on defense but not worse than randle. He's actually a better defender than randle. Already a 20/10 guy. Yes he's more expensive than randle, but that's because he's clearly better. In every way.

If the wolves are dumb enough to do a 1/1 swap, we'll be robbing them blind by unloading this sandbag on them.
He makes twice as much, is injured more and is a worse defender. We'd be dumb to trade low on Randle and ship half the team with him to balance out the contracts.
KnixinSix
Head Coach
Posts: 7,188
And1: 3,871
Joined: Jul 27, 2013
Location: In the Spirit
       

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#182 » by KnixinSix » Mon Nov 6, 2023 9:38 pm

RHODEY wrote:
HighRyzer83 wrote:
ohboy109 wrote:
Nobody wants randle's low iq a** u crazy

Yeah I don't understand why there's any comparison between the two. Kat sucks on defense but not worse than randle. He's actually a better defender than randle. Already a 20/10 guy. Yes he's more expensive than randle, but that's because he's clearly better. In every way.

If the wolves are dumb enough to do a 1/1 swap, we'll be robbing them blind by unloading this sandbag on them.
He makes twice as much, is injured more and is a worse defender. We'd be dumb to trade low on Randle and ship half the team with him to balance out the contracts.


Wouldn't be like that at all

Towns is at 36M this year and Randle is at 28. It would be something like Randle and I-Hart (9M) and potentially something else and a few picks for Towns and possibly Naz Reid. Fournier at 18M also could be used if necessary.

Rosas is our insider. He knows EXACTLY what the Wolves think of Towns and his contract. They probably dont love that it baloons over 50 for a few years and will be willing to part with him without us giving up too much. They have Goebert and Edwards about to make big money. This will be partially cap motivated for them to make this move especially with the looming CBA. For us we have all our top guns making under 30M a year and can easily absorb his contract.
New reality of Son ship!
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
User avatar
Fat
RealGM
Posts: 33,662
And1: 25,821
Joined: Jan 12, 2013
Location: Queens, NY

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#183 » by Fat » Mon Nov 6, 2023 11:23 pm

KAT is basically a lightskin Patrick Ewing with a 3 pointer
Baf: Heat Culture

Ayo Dosunmu | Jamal Shead | Dru
Devin Booker | Brandin Podziemski | Okoro
Demar Derozan | Harrison Barnes | Highsmith
Karl Towns | Jabari Smith
Brook Lopez | Luke Kornet | Achiuwa
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,291
And1: 22,805
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#184 » by RHODEY » Mon Nov 6, 2023 11:29 pm

KnixinSix wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
HighRyzer83 wrote:Yeah I don't understand why there's any comparison between the two. Kat sucks on defense but not worse than randle. He's actually a better defender than randle. Already a 20/10 guy. Yes he's more expensive than randle, but that's because he's clearly better. In every way.

If the wolves are dumb enough to do a 1/1 swap, we'll be robbing them blind by unloading this sandbag on them.
He makes twice as much, is injured more and is a worse defender. We'd be dumb to trade low on Randle and ship half the team with him to balance out the contracts.


Wouldn't be like that at all

Towns is at 36M this year and Randle is at 28. It would be something like Randle and I-Hart (9M) and potentially something else and a few picks for Towns and possibly Naz Reid. Fournier at 18M also could be used if necessary.

Rosas is our insider. He knows EXACTLY what the Wolves think of Towns and his contract. They probably dont love that it baloons over 50 for a few years and will be willing to part with him without us giving up too much. They have Goebert and Edwards about to make big money. This will be partially cap motivated for them to make this move especially with the looming CBA. For us we have all our top guns making under 30M a year and can easily absorb his contract.


I doubt they use Naz Reid as a toss in. Dude is a premier backup big and they love him. That said Ihart is a very good backup himself..Hmmm. As long as they wouldn't want quality picks from us....maybe for that price.
User avatar
HighRyzer83
RealGM
Posts: 12,160
And1: 5,161
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Fan on Fire

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#185 » by HighRyzer83 » Tue Nov 7, 2023 12:53 am

RHODEY wrote:
HighRyzer83 wrote:
ohboy109 wrote:
Nobody wants randle's low iq a** u crazy

Yeah I don't understand why there's any comparison between the two. Kat sucks on defense but not worse than randle. He's actually a better defender than randle. Already a 20/10 guy. Yes he's more expensive than randle, but that's because he's clearly better. In every way.

If the wolves are dumb enough to do a 1/1 swap, we'll be robbing them blind by unloading this sandbag on them.
He makes twice as much, is injured more and is a worse defender. We'd be dumb to trade low on Randle and ship half the team with him to balance out the contracts.

Bruh stop. With all his faults he's boatloads better than Randle.
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,291
And1: 22,805
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#186 » by RHODEY » Tue Nov 7, 2023 3:08 am

HighRyzer83 wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
HighRyzer83 wrote:Yeah I don't understand why there's any comparison between the two. Kat sucks on defense but not worse than randle. He's actually a better defender than randle. Already a 20/10 guy. Yes he's more expensive than randle, but that's because he's clearly better. In every way.

If the wolves are dumb enough to do a 1/1 swap, we'll be robbing them blind by unloading this sandbag on them.
He makes twice as much, is injured more and is a worse defender. We'd be dumb to trade low on Randle and ship half the team with him to balance out the contracts.

Bruh stop. With all his faults he's boatloads better than Randle.

Really so if he is "boatloads better" than Randlle why hasn't he he ever lead his team to the playoffs without riding Jimmy Butler's coattails? You need to stop.
User avatar
KnicksGadfly
RealGM
Posts: 17,793
And1: 19,350
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
   

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#187 » by KnicksGadfly » Tue Nov 7, 2023 2:51 pm

The guy we should really be looking into is Naz Reid.
Lord Commander
General Manager
Posts: 7,599
And1: 2,182
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#188 » by Lord Commander » Tue Nov 7, 2023 3:05 pm

Fat wrote:KAT is basically a lightskin Patrick Ewing with a 3 pointer


Image
HOW DARE YOU?!?!? :lol:
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,788
And1: 48,762
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#189 » by dakomish23 » Mon May 20, 2024 2:43 am

KnicksGadfly wrote:The guy we should really be looking into is Naz Reid.


Him and KAT were both great this year
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
aggo
RealGM
Posts: 16,358
And1: 8,481
Joined: Mar 14, 2006

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#190 » by aggo » Mon May 20, 2024 2:58 am

There is nothing Randle does better than kat.
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,355
And1: 56,898
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#191 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Mon May 20, 2024 3:04 am

His post defense against Jokic is a big reason why they won, they're not trading him anymore, his offense kept them in that game until Ant came back around.
BrOnXKing1
Starter
Posts: 2,228
And1: 721
Joined: Jul 14, 2004
Location: BX

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#192 » by BrOnXKing1 » Mon May 20, 2024 4:45 am

This is was a move that we could of made last yr. Not happening anymore. I dont think any legit star going to be available outside of maybe Mitchell. Suns not going to break up Booker/Durant without giving it one more shot.
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,610
And1: 5,742
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#193 » by spree2kawhi » Mon May 20, 2024 2:37 pm

iLLmatic860 wrote:Nobody wants kat. I know hes overpaid

But atleast he would be able to stretch the floor. Our shooting is embarrassing

I want KAT here. He’s perfect for us.
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,610
And1: 5,742
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#194 » by spree2kawhi » Mon May 20, 2024 2:38 pm

aggo wrote:There is nothing Randle does better than kat.

This is absolutely true. They might do a trade to save money, but we have to up the offer.
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,610
And1: 5,742
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#195 » by spree2kawhi » Mon May 20, 2024 2:39 pm

dakomish23 wrote:
KnicksGadfly wrote:The guy we should really be looking into is Naz Reid.


Him and KAT were both great this year

They only need (and are only able to afford) one. I’m sure they’d like Mitch there.
Mr_President
Senior
Posts: 644
And1: 298
Joined: Jul 06, 2010

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#196 » by Mr_President » Mon May 20, 2024 2:44 pm

The question: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?

Enter anyone into a mental institution who prefers watching Randle either give a dismal playoff performance, then a lame one with an ankle excuse, or miss it entirely with a freaking popped shoulder. You have Stockholm syndrome!

That's third STRIKE BUDDY.
User avatar
iLLmatic860
General Manager
Posts: 9,896
And1: 16,387
Joined: Jan 23, 2013
Location: Tampa
     

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#197 » by iLLmatic860 » Mon May 20, 2024 4:06 pm

Honestly the lil bit of spacing that ihart gives with his floater game is good. Imagine having a big who is a legit threat from deep

Kat even played jokic very well

Ill def take him over randle
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,291
And1: 22,805
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#198 » by RHODEY » Mon May 20, 2024 5:06 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:
aggo wrote:There is nothing Randle does better than kat.

This is absolutely true. They might do a trade to save money, but we have to up the offer.

Absolutely false. This season Randle did 2 things better and is almost equal rebounder.
Image

They are very close production wise. The question is what is more important to this team 3 point shooting and free throw shooting or.... play making? If the shooting and the extra spacing it would provide is more important, is it important enough to justify the extra salary that you have to trade out for Kat?
aggo
RealGM
Posts: 16,358
And1: 8,481
Joined: Mar 14, 2006

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#199 » by aggo » Mon May 20, 2024 5:18 pm

RHODEY wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:
aggo wrote:There is nothing Randle does better than kat.

This is absolutely true. They might do a trade to save money, but we have to up the offer.

Absolutely false. This season Randle did 2 things better and is almost equal rebounder.
Image

They are very close production wise. The question is what is more important to this team 3 point shooting and free throw shooting or.... play making? If the shooting and the extra spacing it would provide is more important, is it important enough to justify the extra salary that you have to trade out for Kat?


how about showing up for the playoffs?
nedleeds
General Manager
Posts: 9,045
And1: 8,091
Joined: Dec 25, 2016
Location: Bridgeport, NY
Contact:
       

Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle? 

Post#200 » by nedleeds » Mon May 20, 2024 5:40 pm

Mr_President wrote:The question: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?

Enter anyone into a mental institution who prefers watching Randle either give a dismal playoff performance, then a lame one with an ankle excuse, or miss it entirely with a freaking popped shoulder. You have Stockholm syndrome!

That's third STRIKE BUDDY.



The question: We had a bad season and got bounced by a lower seed with our entire starting lineup injured by our clown car head coach who KAT hated playing for. Why the **** are the Wolves who still might make the finals trading KAT for a no effort bum who has ended the past two seasons with surgery?

The arrogance of our fanbase is breath taking.
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.

Return to New York Knicks


cron