He makes twice as much, is injured more and is a worse defender. We'd be dumb to trade low on Randle and ship half the team with him to balance out the contracts.HighRyzer83 wrote:ohboy109 wrote:Snacks wrote:
Nobody wants KAT.
We're Knick fans and this is hell. We have to make a choice between horrible things we really don't want.
Nobody wants randle's low iq a** u crazy
Yeah I don't understand why there's any comparison between the two. Kat sucks on defense but not worse than randle. He's actually a better defender than randle. Already a 20/10 guy. Yes he's more expensive than randle, but that's because he's clearly better. In every way.
If the wolves are dumb enough to do a 1/1 swap, we'll be robbing them blind by unloading this sandbag on them.
Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
- RHODEY
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,294
- And1: 22,808
- Joined: May 18, 2007
- Location: Straight out of a comic book
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
-
KnixinSix
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,188
- And1: 3,871
- Joined: Jul 27, 2013
- Location: In the Spirit
-
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
RHODEY wrote:He makes twice as much, is injured more and is a worse defender. We'd be dumb to trade low on Randle and ship half the team with him to balance out the contracts.HighRyzer83 wrote:ohboy109 wrote:
Nobody wants randle's low iq a** u crazy
Yeah I don't understand why there's any comparison between the two. Kat sucks on defense but not worse than randle. He's actually a better defender than randle. Already a 20/10 guy. Yes he's more expensive than randle, but that's because he's clearly better. In every way.
If the wolves are dumb enough to do a 1/1 swap, we'll be robbing them blind by unloading this sandbag on them.
Wouldn't be like that at all
Towns is at 36M this year and Randle is at 28. It would be something like Randle and I-Hart (9M) and potentially something else and a few picks for Towns and possibly Naz Reid. Fournier at 18M also could be used if necessary.
Rosas is our insider. He knows EXACTLY what the Wolves think of Towns and his contract. They probably dont love that it baloons over 50 for a few years and will be willing to part with him without us giving up too much. They have Goebert and Edwards about to make big money. This will be partially cap motivated for them to make this move especially with the looming CBA. For us we have all our top guns making under 30M a year and can easily absorb his contract.
New reality of Son ship!
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
- Fat
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,665
- And1: 25,826
- Joined: Jan 12, 2013
- Location: Queens, NY
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
KAT is basically a lightskin Patrick Ewing with a 3 pointer
Baf: Heat Culture
Ayo Dosunmu | Jamal Shead | Dru
Devin Booker | Brandin Podziemski | Okoro
Demar Derozan | Harrison Barnes | Highsmith
Karl Towns | Jabari Smith
Brook Lopez | Luke Kornet | Achiuwa
Ayo Dosunmu | Jamal Shead | Dru
Devin Booker | Brandin Podziemski | Okoro
Demar Derozan | Harrison Barnes | Highsmith
Karl Towns | Jabari Smith
Brook Lopez | Luke Kornet | Achiuwa
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
- RHODEY
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,294
- And1: 22,808
- Joined: May 18, 2007
- Location: Straight out of a comic book
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
KnixinSix wrote:RHODEY wrote:He makes twice as much, is injured more and is a worse defender. We'd be dumb to trade low on Randle and ship half the team with him to balance out the contracts.HighRyzer83 wrote:Yeah I don't understand why there's any comparison between the two. Kat sucks on defense but not worse than randle. He's actually a better defender than randle. Already a 20/10 guy. Yes he's more expensive than randle, but that's because he's clearly better. In every way.
If the wolves are dumb enough to do a 1/1 swap, we'll be robbing them blind by unloading this sandbag on them.
Wouldn't be like that at all
Towns is at 36M this year and Randle is at 28. It would be something like Randle and I-Hart (9M) and potentially something else and a few picks for Towns and possibly Naz Reid. Fournier at 18M also could be used if necessary.
Rosas is our insider. He knows EXACTLY what the Wolves think of Towns and his contract. They probably dont love that it baloons over 50 for a few years and will be willing to part with him without us giving up too much. They have Goebert and Edwards about to make big money. This will be partially cap motivated for them to make this move especially with the looming CBA. For us we have all our top guns making under 30M a year and can easily absorb his contract.
I doubt they use Naz Reid as a toss in. Dude is a premier backup big and they love him. That said Ihart is a very good backup himself..Hmmm. As long as they wouldn't want quality picks from us....maybe for that price.
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
- HighRyzer83
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,160
- And1: 5,161
- Joined: Nov 20, 2004
- Location: Fan on Fire
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
RHODEY wrote:He makes twice as much, is injured more and is a worse defender. We'd be dumb to trade low on Randle and ship half the team with him to balance out the contracts.HighRyzer83 wrote:ohboy109 wrote:
Nobody wants randle's low iq a** u crazy
Yeah I don't understand why there's any comparison between the two. Kat sucks on defense but not worse than randle. He's actually a better defender than randle. Already a 20/10 guy. Yes he's more expensive than randle, but that's because he's clearly better. In every way.
If the wolves are dumb enough to do a 1/1 swap, we'll be robbing them blind by unloading this sandbag on them.
Bruh stop. With all his faults he's boatloads better than Randle.
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
- RHODEY
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,294
- And1: 22,808
- Joined: May 18, 2007
- Location: Straight out of a comic book
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
HighRyzer83 wrote:RHODEY wrote:He makes twice as much, is injured more and is a worse defender. We'd be dumb to trade low on Randle and ship half the team with him to balance out the contracts.HighRyzer83 wrote:Yeah I don't understand why there's any comparison between the two. Kat sucks on defense but not worse than randle. He's actually a better defender than randle. Already a 20/10 guy. Yes he's more expensive than randle, but that's because he's clearly better. In every way.
If the wolves are dumb enough to do a 1/1 swap, we'll be robbing them blind by unloading this sandbag on them.
Bruh stop. With all his faults he's boatloads better than Randle.
Really so if he is "boatloads better" than Randlle why hasn't he he ever lead his team to the playoffs without riding Jimmy Butler's coattails? You need to stop.
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
- KnicksGadfly
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,795
- And1: 19,351
- Joined: Jul 29, 2007
-
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
The guy we should really be looking into is Naz Reid.
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
-
Lord Commander
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,600
- And1: 2,184
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
-
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
Fat wrote:KAT is basically a lightskin Patrick Ewing with a 3 pointer

HOW DARE YOU?!?!?
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
- dakomish23
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 58,788
- And1: 48,762
- Joined: Sep 22, 2013
- Location: Empire State
-
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
KnicksGadfly wrote:The guy we should really be looking into is Naz Reid.
Him and KAT were both great this year
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
#FreeJimmit
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
-
aggo
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,358
- And1: 8,481
- Joined: Mar 14, 2006
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
There is nothing Randle does better than kat.
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
- NoDopeOnSundays
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,357
- And1: 56,905
- Joined: Nov 22, 2005
-
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
His post defense against Jokic is a big reason why they won, they're not trading him anymore, his offense kept them in that game until Ant came back around.
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
-
BrOnXKing1
- Starter
- Posts: 2,228
- And1: 721
- Joined: Jul 14, 2004
- Location: BX
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
This is was a move that we could of made last yr. Not happening anymore. I dont think any legit star going to be available outside of maybe Mitchell. Suns not going to break up Booker/Durant without giving it one more shot.
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
-
spree2kawhi
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,610
- And1: 5,742
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
iLLmatic860 wrote:Nobody wants kat. I know hes overpaid
But atleast he would be able to stretch the floor. Our shooting is embarrassing
I want KAT here. He’s perfect for us.
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
-
spree2kawhi
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,610
- And1: 5,742
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
aggo wrote:There is nothing Randle does better than kat.
This is absolutely true. They might do a trade to save money, but we have to up the offer.
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
-
spree2kawhi
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,610
- And1: 5,742
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
dakomish23 wrote:KnicksGadfly wrote:The guy we should really be looking into is Naz Reid.
Him and KAT were both great this year
They only need (and are only able to afford) one. I’m sure they’d like Mitch there.
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
-
Mr_President
- Senior
- Posts: 644
- And1: 298
- Joined: Jul 06, 2010
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
The question: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
Enter anyone into a mental institution who prefers watching Randle either give a dismal playoff performance, then a lame one with an ankle excuse, or miss it entirely with a freaking popped shoulder. You have Stockholm syndrome!
That's third STRIKE BUDDY.
Enter anyone into a mental institution who prefers watching Randle either give a dismal playoff performance, then a lame one with an ankle excuse, or miss it entirely with a freaking popped shoulder. You have Stockholm syndrome!
That's third STRIKE BUDDY.
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
- iLLmatic860
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,896
- And1: 16,387
- Joined: Jan 23, 2013
- Location: Tampa
-
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
Honestly the lil bit of spacing that ihart gives with his floater game is good. Imagine having a big who is a legit threat from deep
Kat even played jokic very well
Ill def take him over randle
Kat even played jokic very well
Ill def take him over randle
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
- RHODEY
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,294
- And1: 22,808
- Joined: May 18, 2007
- Location: Straight out of a comic book
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
spree2kawhi wrote:aggo wrote:There is nothing Randle does better than kat.
This is absolutely true. They might do a trade to save money, but we have to up the offer.
Absolutely false. This season Randle did 2 things better and is almost equal rebounder.

They are very close production wise. The question is what is more important to this team 3 point shooting and free throw shooting or.... play making? If the shooting and the extra spacing it would provide is more important, is it important enough to justify the extra salary that you have to trade out for Kat?
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
-
aggo
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,358
- And1: 8,481
- Joined: Mar 14, 2006
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
RHODEY wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:aggo wrote:There is nothing Randle does better than kat.
This is absolutely true. They might do a trade to save money, but we have to up the offer.
Absolutely false. This season Randle did 2 things better and is almost equal rebounder.
They are very close production wise. The question is what is more important to this team 3 point shooting and free throw shooting or.... play making? If the shooting and the extra spacing it would provide is more important, is it important enough to justify the extra salary that you have to trade out for Kat?
how about showing up for the playoffs?
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
-
nedleeds
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,045
- And1: 8,091
- Joined: Dec 25, 2016
- Location: Bridgeport, NY
- Contact:
-
Re: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
Mr_President wrote:The question: Is Kat really gonna be worse to watch than Randle?
Enter anyone into a mental institution who prefers watching Randle either give a dismal playoff performance, then a lame one with an ankle excuse, or miss it entirely with a freaking popped shoulder. You have Stockholm syndrome!
That's third STRIKE BUDDY.
The question: We had a bad season and got bounced by a lower seed with our entire starting lineup injured by our clown car head coach who KAT hated playing for. Why the **** are the Wolves who still might make the finals trading KAT for a no effort bum who has ended the past two seasons with surgery?
The arrogance of our fanbase is breath taking.
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.











