Skybox wrote:Knightro wrote:drsd wrote:We all know my favorite statistic in FG%. Win the FG% in a given game, and about 90% of the time, you win the game.
Just curious where you came up with this 90% figure?
Assuming it's a fact ("about" usually suggests it's a feeling), it's flawed without the shot mix. Nobody's winning based on FG% without a reasonable percentage of 3pt shots. You CAN have lots of shooters and suck, but you can't NOT have shooters and not suck...This isn't Bad Boys era. If it were, here are the current 5 best players in the world...
1. Mark WilliamsCHA 83.0
2. Jalen SmithIND 71.7
3. Jakob PoeltlTOR 66.7
4. Onyeka OkongwuATL 63.8
5. Jalen DurenDET 63.8
Does Orlando Suck? We don't have any good %/volume shooters, outside Harris, and even he i am not sure qualifies as volume and who has been mostly unavailable. What is relevant is TS% percentage in relation to volume. The list above, yah those teams should find ways to get those guys additional looks through lobs, rolls, and cuts. 75% is 75%, which is the equivalent of a 50% 3 point shooter.
There are different ways to score the basketball, you want the team TS% as high as possible, either through shots at the rim (including by bigs), FTs, converted open threes (150% of a made 2 pointer), or even in some instances the midrange (see Kevin Durant)
Jokic is easily the best basketball player in the world and he made less than 1 three a game last year...obviously what makes him so great is the unbelievable efficiency, 70.1% TS last year, along with giving his teammates what seems like an endless supply of layups and open threes or open shots in general.
Quality shots and making them, and making the other team take contested/bad shots is what wins and loses basketball games.