KamikazeK wrote:I'm rooting for Celtics-Lakers in the cup finals. It's the only thing that makes sense.
100%
Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob
KamikazeK wrote:I'm rooting for Celtics-Lakers in the cup finals. It's the only thing that makes sense.
KamikazeK wrote:Tonight, the Chicago Bulls were actually the Sacrificial Lambs.
Shak_Celts wrote:keevsnick1 wrote:Froob wrote:We all played the same teams. It was fair. Sucks to suck Orlando, let’s hit the big dance!
Yep, if Orl didn't like it they could have simply not lost to the Nets. Then they'd be 4-0 and point differential wouldn't matter.
had we won by +21 all of you would sing a different tune. I am happy the rules made a way for us to advance, but if they stay the same and we miss out next season I'll be mad. I'm ecstatic right now, but I still don't like how it's set up. I'm talking about them fixing it next season, but I'd be pissed if I were bkn fans for sure.
Shak_Celts wrote:KamikazeK wrote:Let me just say RIP to orlando fans if they miss out on the tournament over this
nba must fix this next season, they stomped us and lose an easy bid because we stomped a worse team.
Fierce1 wrote:Going from 82 to 83 is not a big deal with teams allowed to load management.
Mr_Mojo_Risin wrote:VeryMuchWoke wrote:bisme37 wrote:
They left a gap in the 82 game schedule next week that will now be scheduled.
So by qualifying for the tournament we earned ourselves a tougher regular season schedule?
It doesn't change who you play where or how often, just when.
Shak_Celts wrote:Fierce1 wrote:The Wagner group almost took out Team 6.
why can't we beat them? when was the last time?
reload141 wrote:bisme37 wrote:Haters will hate but this stupid tournament is actually really fun lol.
Yep.
Let the record show that I am a MASSIVE fan of it.
It’s better than winning Banner 18 to be honest.
Fencer reregistered wrote:Mr_Mojo_Risin wrote:VeryMuchWoke wrote:
So by qualifying for the tournament we earned ourselves a tougher regular season schedule?
It doesn't change who you play where or how often, just when.
That makes sense mainly if all 82 games were scheduled, but now 6 of them will be cancelled because they're being replaced by tourney knockout games.
In that case, only the 2 semifinal games in Vegas will result in somebody having a home game moved to a neutral court.
SLCceltic wrote:Fierce1 wrote:Going from 82 to 83 is not a big deal with teams allowed to load management.
I want to go from like 82 to 62 ...even 52 would be PLENTy to determine 8 best teams from each conf.
I mean teams with deep PO runs end up playing 100+ games
I get that owners want all 41 games in their place but 100 dam games per season SHeeeSH