art_tatum wrote:I hope the warriors go on a run without him.
Blazer fans disagree lol
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
art_tatum wrote:I hope the warriors go on a run without him.
the sea duck wrote:mkot wrote:He needs to just come out and apologize. Just say yes I lost my cool and I'm sorry. I think that's what the league wanted him to do before handing him the punishment and I think that's right. He needs to show remorse or otherwise next time he's gonna clothesline someone or whatever.
yeah i think they want to him to humble himself and "earn" his way back. i actually don't know that draymond will do it. he certainly hasn't shown that in the past, but then again he hasn't been challenged in the past. will be interesting.
NZB2323 wrote:Free Rider wrote:This kinda feels like a copout to me. Rather than just settling on a clear, lengthy, and highly warranted suspension period, they've essentially designed a form of discipline that allows Draymond to control his own fate by fulfilling some undefined set of conditions. It leaves room for the possibility that if he shows he's undergoing some form of counseling or therapy he can return within a few weeks. I think it would have been better for them to go all in and suspend him for 25 games so there's a clear understanding of what the consequences are.
If the goal is to rehabilitate him, what’s wrong with saying he can come back once he’s rehabilitated? Isn’t that better than some arbitrary number of games?
moderndarwin wrote:The thing with Dray is that he’s built this flailing and extra motions into his muscle memory now.
I legit don’t think this one was intentional he was just flailing around and happened to catch Nurk. Not that makes it excusable.
This is quite different than when he choked out Gobert.
DC_Melo wrote:NZB2323 wrote:Free Rider wrote:This kinda feels like a copout to me. Rather than just settling on a clear, lengthy, and highly warranted suspension period, they've essentially designed a form of discipline that allows Draymond to control his own fate by fulfilling some undefined set of conditions. It leaves room for the possibility that if he shows he's undergoing some form of counseling or therapy he can return within a few weeks. I think it would have been better for them to go all in and suspend him for 25 games so there's a clear understanding of what the consequences are.
If the goal is to rehabilitate him, what’s wrong with saying he can come back once he’s rehabilitated? Isn’t that better than some arbitrary number of games?
Exactly this. A defined number of game won’t change Draymond. He needs professional help.
This is the opposite of a cop out. It is directly telling Draymond and the Warriors that onus is on them to prove he can return to the league without being a safety hazard to everyone else.
Silver is essentially telling him he needs to get counseling/rehab while sidestepping the pushback Draymond’s agent, Warriors FO or the players union would give if he directly said he needed counseling/rehab. It’s a clever move that delivers a heavy message Draymond, the FO, and union can’t refute.
Sofia wrote:Indefinite? Not long enough


JayMKE wrote:What "challenges" is Dray facing? They always gotta dress **** up like some mental health self help come on, rehabilitated lol come on man. Draymond can only come back if he's medicated lookin ass
davey_wavy wrote:Wish I could assault someone at work and get counseling instead of being fired
KingFox wrote:canada_dry wrote:He better not show up on his podcast talking nonsense. On your best behavior from now on. People are done with your crap.
Idk. Feels like we say this every week
dhsilv2 wrote:NZB2323 wrote:Free Rider wrote:This kinda feels like a copout to me. Rather than just settling on a clear, lengthy, and highly warranted suspension period, they've essentially designed a form of discipline that allows Draymond to control his own fate by fulfilling some undefined set of conditions. It leaves room for the possibility that if he shows he's undergoing some form of counseling or therapy he can return within a few weeks. I think it would have been better for them to go all in and suspend him for 25 games so there's a clear understanding of what the consequences are.
If the goal is to rehabilitate him, what’s wrong with saying he can come back once he’s rehabilitated? Isn’t that better than some arbitrary number of games?
Could have just said it was X number of games + completion which may or may not take those games. But it gives some idea of a min here. Lets be real, he'll have to do some charity work and talk to someone about his anger issues? Odds are they know exactly how long that should take.
Thaddy wrote:I can tell you right now the Bulls will collapse by mid season and will be fighting in or for the play in.
Remember it.
Laimbeer wrote:Spoiler:
So you meet with a player's agent when deciding his punishment? It seems to me they're trying to somewhat absolve him by pushing the notion he has an emotional issue he can't control. The way they are framing it is favorable to Draymond, imo.
He isn't losing control, he thinks he's going to get away with dirty shots by pretending they were natural movements. But he's so damn ham-handed about it.
Pachinko_ wrote:Ι don't understand.
You have the old guys in the media glorifying how tough the old NBA was
You got the fans extremely excited every time the smallest "fight" errupts, even though it's usually nothing but words
But then as soon as anyone actually does anything with their hands it's suspensions immediately.
I mean I don't mind either way, for me basketball always meant some low level violence, nothing serious, maybe a couple of bruises.
So take your pick people, what kind of hoops do you actually want? Squeaky clean or a little bit dirty? The commissar will oblige.
Sixers in 4 wrote:the sea duck wrote:mkot wrote:He needs to just come out and apologize. Just say yes I lost my cool and I'm sorry. I think that's what the league wanted him to do before handing him the punishment and I think that's right. He needs to show remorse or otherwise next time he's gonna clothesline someone or whatever.
yeah i think they want to him to humble himself and "earn" his way back. i actually don't know that draymond will do it. he certainly hasn't shown that in the past, but then again he hasn't been challenged in the past. will be interesting.
All this focus is on Dray. It's not about whether he is sorry. Or if he apologizes. Or if he gets help. It's about the other players on the court at this point and making sure they feel comfortable playing basketball with him.
The focus should be on them, not dray. If the other players in the NBA feel he is sincere and want him on the court then the NBA should let him back in after counseling or whatever hoops they want him to go through. If other NBA players don't ever want to play with him again then make the suspension permanent.
Draymond forfeited the right to self-determination long ago. His career should be in the hands of his peers.
shrink wrote:I’ve seen a couple people suggest that one condition of Draymond’s return should be a public apology. I think that would be tough for Green to do, particularly since he’s so proud of himself for being unapologetic. I think though he could grit his teeth and get through this one, particularly to Nurkic.
However, what if the NBA asked him to publicly apologize for EACH of his actions that led to suspensions over the years? They could claim that they want him to see that this is a pattern of behavior from him that must stop. If they want him out of the league, this may be a way to do it without getting blood on their hands, and hatred from Warriors fans. It would be Draymond’s decision whether to do it, and I don’t think he would. He likes his image more than he likes being a good teammate.