ImageImageImageImageImage

Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

AHCanada
Freshman
Posts: 71
And1: 55
Joined: Nov 03, 2012

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#341 » by AHCanada » Mon Jan 8, 2024 1:31 pm

Raps in 4 wrote:
ImaBeatDatAzz wrote:
Raps in 4 wrote:
Kuminga sucks. The only reason we're even entertaining trading Pascsal for him is because we're also getting desperate. I'd do Pascal for Kuminga, Moody, and Podz, even though it's not great return, just so we can finally focus our efforts on building around Scottie and avoid Pascal potentially walking in the off-season.

Bruh, kuminga moody AND podz is an amazing return


Not one of those three has realistic star potential. They're all mid tier prospects, at best.

I'd also happily trade for picks from GSW since they will suck soon, but Masai doesn't like trading for picks.


Ya I'd rather Siakam be traded for a young player with clear star potential and is a good shooter. Or maybe sign for around 40mil/yr (with a trade kicker?) to make him more movable in a year.
ArthurVandelay
Head Coach
Posts: 6,563
And1: 6,302
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
 

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#342 » by ArthurVandelay » Mon Jan 8, 2024 1:33 pm

Appostis wrote:
TGM wrote:Moving Pascal is a must. We likely won’t get fair vlaue, but paying him max makes even less sense. Also we don’t have enough shots to go around and right now I would prioritise Barnes, IQ and RJ. Get a young player with upside


How exactly do you actually come to this conclusion? :lol:

People so desperate to make a trade even if it's a bad one. :crazy:


If an extension is offered and he rejects it, then it is very easy to come to this conclusion.

Also, Pascal on a max extension combined with IQ extension and Scottie upcoming extension, puts the Raptors in the luxury tax. That is going to approve by MLSE if they aren't a contender plus the new CBA places a number of restrictions on cap teams making it difficult to obtain talent.

Siakam has been a great Raptor, one of the best, but every good thing comes to an end.
Rapsfan07
RealGM
Posts: 15,005
And1: 6,042
Joined: Nov 19, 2010
 

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#343 » by Rapsfan07 » Mon Jan 8, 2024 1:36 pm

Yeezus_ wrote:
Rapsfan07 wrote:
Yeezus_ wrote:Have some of you seen Mathurin play? I get he’s a prospect but I’m sick of ball players who have no idea what passing and playmaking is. We’ve seen enough of that with Trent, OG and Precious.


Can't be worried about that right now. Just got to get the best young pieces you can for Siakam and figure the rest out later.

If Masai wanted his pick of the litter, he should have moved Siakam earlier. Can't be picky now.

There's no reason to trade him unless they get a package that fits Scottie Barnes well.


I don't agree for many reasons already outlined many times in these threads but if that's what you believe, that's okay.
Image
TGM
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,180
And1: 1,083
Joined: Dec 19, 2004

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#344 » by TGM » Mon Jan 8, 2024 1:45 pm

greekman wrote:
TGM wrote:Moving Pascal is a must. We likely won’t get fair vlaue, but paying him max makes even less sense. Also we don’t have enough shots to go around and right now I would prioritise Barnes, IQ and RJ. Get a young player with upside


since when has siakam demanded a trade ?


You got to consider the cap. We got RJ at 25 a year, Barnes will be 40, IQ will be around 25 and Jakob at 20. Those four add up to 110. If you max out Pascal at close to 50 million a year. You have already exceeded the 142 cap. We are at 160. This is before considering Denis, Dick, Boucher Them 3 already take us to 190 million and we would be in luxury tax zone. Add in some scrap players and we at 200 million and a being close to 20 million over the tax threshold. No way ownership pays that money. Now if Pascal is willing to resign at 30-35 a year for 5 years sure. But don't see that happening.

Unless you think that is a contender, I don't see any reason why the Raps would put themselves in that position.

So how is a trade not somewhat inevitable.

People say just resign Pascal and trade him later. The funny thing is no one wants a max contract for a non max player and will be 34-35 at the tail end of the contract. Also teams trading for Pascal are looking to add a 3rd star. Not sure thats the kind of money you want to dish out.

So most likely what happens is you trade Pascal for a few smaller pieces and where one or two are under rookie scale control or bird rights. If we ship out 40-50 million in a trade, I bet you we are going to get 10-15 million back in the form of expiring contracts as well.

Let's not even consider who the actual players are but more so the math. Take GS for a second:

Paul 30 million expiring, Kuminga 6 million, Moody 4 million. Paul you either buy out or flip to a contender for expiring contract and picks. Something like Paul for Lowry and 2 2nds.

Indy also works as they have some expiring's with Buddy or Brown who has a team option.

You now go into the off-season

IQ - 25 million
RJ - 25 million
Barnes - 40 million
Kuminga -15 million (You will probably try to extend at a cheaper price) Could get to 20 million though. Just benchmark OG's last extension with us.
Moody - 5 million
Jakob - 20 million
Boucher 10 million
Dick - 5 million
Jontay - 2 million (Try to lock him up to a cheap multi-year)
JFL - 2 million
Dennis - 13 million
McDaniels - 5 million
Koloko - 2 million

This line-up you are at 179million. You are going to be 2-3 million below the tax threshold. Maybe you add a guy at the MLE depending on where the tax level gets set. Now you bank on these guys basically all improving the following year and maybe you consolidate some pieces in 2025 and try to get another star.

With the math above Trent is a goner as well for sure. People give Masai **** for not extending. Last thing you want is a bunch of overloaded contracts not worth what they are and we end up giving up picks for people to eat the contracts. This is Toronto and not LA or Miami where you can pay someone a first to eat a bad contract and a tier 1 FA signs with you. Instead we pay a first round to get someone to eat a contract and we end up with guys like Hedo Turkoglu
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,201
And1: 24,500
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#345 » by Pointgod » Mon Jan 8, 2024 1:48 pm

ImaBeatDatAzz wrote:I hope yall are right about Jarace Walker, seems like the most possible trade is with Indy and we get him. Indy likes mithurin a lot so Walker, Nesmith and Bield is enough. Trade Gtj for a quality Center and there is your retool


I’m confident that we could get both Jarace Walker and Mathurin along with Buddy Hield as long as Masai doesn’t go crazy and ask for like 3 additional first round picks. Both Mathurin and Walker were lottery picks so maybe Indiana gives us one of their late picks this year but that’s the most sweetener I’d ask for. Pascal fits Indiana like a glove though, he’s the ideal second option to pair with a first option that can also play off ball. Hes the ideal fit in either Golden State or Indiana
TGM
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,180
And1: 1,083
Joined: Dec 19, 2004

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#346 » by TGM » Mon Jan 8, 2024 1:51 pm

Funny thing is people on this forum would be all hard and horny asking to get their faces painted if Kuminga had a good game today. He played like crap so a lot of people are like we don't want GS' trash. Next week Kuminga has some crazy put back dunk and everyone is sucking the magic stick again!

Masai is a real GM (no pun intended) and he is not going to make a trade based off Friday's ESPN top ten highlights.
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 42,618
And1: 23,787
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#347 » by ATLTimekeeper » Mon Jan 8, 2024 1:56 pm

Pointgod wrote:
ImaBeatDatAzz wrote:I hope yall are right about Jarace Walker, seems like the most possible trade is with Indy and we get him. Indy likes mithurin a lot so Walker, Nesmith and Bield is enough. Trade Gtj for a quality Center and there is your retool


I’m confident that we could get both Jarace Walker and Mathurin along with Buddy Hield as long as Masai doesn’t go crazy and ask for like 3 additional first round picks. Both Mathurin and Walker were lottery picks so maybe Indiana gives us one of their late picks this year but that’s the most sweetener I’d ask for. Pascal fits Indiana like a glove though, he’s the ideal second option to pair with a first option that can also play off ball. Hes the ideal fit in either Golden State or Indiana


What makes you confident? Pascal isn't going to re-sign in Indiana. Indiana isn't going to trade their last two lottery picks for a rental. The whole "no other team is offering their best prospect" rumours should be your first clue that what you're expecting is out of whack with reality.
MoneyBall
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,717
And1: 4,016
Joined: May 02, 2009

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#348 » by MoneyBall » Mon Jan 8, 2024 1:59 pm

ATLTimekeeper wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
ImaBeatDatAzz wrote:I hope yall are right about Jarace Walker, seems like the most possible trade is with Indy and we get him. Indy likes mithurin a lot so Walker, Nesmith and Bield is enough. Trade Gtj for a quality Center and there is your retool


I’m confident that we could get both Jarace Walker and Mathurin along with Buddy Hield as long as Masai doesn’t go crazy and ask for like 3 additional first round picks. Both Mathurin and Walker were lottery picks so maybe Indiana gives us one of their late picks this year but that’s the most sweetener I’d ask for. Pascal fits Indiana like a glove though, he’s the ideal second option to pair with a first option that can also play off ball. Hes the ideal fit in either Golden State or Indiana


What makes you confident? Pascal isn't going to re-sign in Indiana. Indiana isn't going to trade their last two lottery picks for a rental. The whole "no other team is offering their best prospect" rumours should be your first clue that what you're expecting is out of whack with reality.

I'm getting some FVV vibes from Siakam in terms of wanting the most money. If Pacers are prepared to pay up, I don't see why Siakam would leave for less money.
Rapsfan07
RealGM
Posts: 15,005
And1: 6,042
Joined: Nov 19, 2010
 

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#349 » by Rapsfan07 » Mon Jan 8, 2024 2:00 pm

T-d0t wrote:
LoveMyRaps wrote:
TorontoBarneys wrote:Kings got spanked by 33 in a blowout loss and Keegan was awful.

Maybe more games like that and he stops being untouchable?


Back to back mid games for Jalen Johnson as well.

If all are on the table, who are you taking and why?

Keegan
Jalen Johnson
Trey Murphy


1. Johnson
2. Murphy
3. Keegan
Image
Jerry Lucas
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,879
And1: 1,828
Joined: Apr 01, 2021
     

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#350 » by Jerry Lucas » Mon Jan 8, 2024 2:05 pm

TGM wrote:
greekman wrote:
TGM wrote:Moving Pascal is a must. We likely won’t get fair vlaue, but paying him max makes even less sense. Also we don’t have enough shots to go around and right now I would prioritise Barnes, IQ and RJ. Get a young player with upside


since when has siakam demanded a trade ?


You got to consider the cap. We got RJ at 25 a year, Barnes will be 40, IQ will be around 25 and Jakob at 20. Those four add up to 110. If you max out Pascal at close to 50 million a year. You have already exceeded the 142 cap. We are at 160. This is before considering Denis, Dick, Boucher Them 3 already take us to 190 million and we would be in luxury tax zone. Add in some scrap players and we at 200 million and a being close to 20 million over the tax threshold. No way ownership pays that money. Now if Pascal is willing to resign at 30-35 a year for 5 years sure. But don't see that happening.

Unless you think that is a contender, I don't see any reason why the Raps would put themselves in that position.

So how is a trade not somewhat inevitable.

People say just resign Pascal and trade him later. The funny thing is no one wants a max contract for a non max player and will be 34-35 at the tail end of the contract. Also teams trading for Pascal are looking to add a 3rd star. Not sure thats the kind of money you want to dish out.

So most likely what happens is you trade Pascal for a few smaller pieces and where one or two are under rookie scale control or bird rights. If we ship out 40-50 million in a trade, I bet you we are going to get 10-15 million back in the form of expiring contracts as well.

Let's not even consider who the actual players are but more so the math. Take GS for a second:

Paul 30 million expiring, Kuminga 6 million, Moody 4 million. Paul you either buy out or flip to a contender for expiring contract and picks. Something like Paul for Lowry and 2 2nds.

Indy also works as they have some expiring's with Buddy or Brown who has a team option.

You now go into the off-season

IQ - 25 million
RJ - 25 million
Barnes - 40 million
Kuminga -15 million (You will probably try to extend at a cheaper price) Could get to 20 million though. Just benchmark OG's last extension with us.
Moody - 5 million
Jakob - 20 million
Boucher 10 million
Dick - 5 million
Jontay - 2 million (Try to lock him up to a cheap multi-year)
JFL - 2 million
Dennis - 13 million
McDaniels - 5 million
Koloko - 2 million

This line-up you are at 179million. You are going to be 2-3 million below the tax threshold. Maybe you add a guy at the MLE depending on where the tax level gets set. Now you bank on these guys basically all improving the following year and maybe you consolidate some pieces in 2025 and try to get another star.

With the math above Trent is a goner as well for sure. People give Masai **** for not extending. Last thing you want is a bunch of overloaded contracts not worth what they are and we end up giving up picks for people to eat the contracts. This is Toronto and not LA or Miami where you can pay someone a first to eat a bad contract and a tier 1 FA signs with you. Instead we pay a first round to get someone to eat a contract and we end up with guys like Hedo Turkoglu

Scottie's rookie max doesn't begin until the 2025-26 season.
My Masai/Bobby-type FRP Barttorvik queries: 4/4, zero misses

Team Find The Next Superstar Closer
User avatar
dTox
RealGM
Posts: 16,262
And1: 17,417
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Location: Basement
   

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#351 » by dTox » Mon Jan 8, 2024 2:08 pm

Am I the only one who doesn't want Mathurin?

Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
Image
FREE PALESTINE
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 42,618
And1: 23,787
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#352 » by ATLTimekeeper » Mon Jan 8, 2024 2:09 pm

MoneyBall wrote:
ATLTimekeeper wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
I’m confident that we could get both Jarace Walker and Mathurin along with Buddy Hield as long as Masai doesn’t go crazy and ask for like 3 additional first round picks. Both Mathurin and Walker were lottery picks so maybe Indiana gives us one of their late picks this year but that’s the most sweetener I’d ask for. Pascal fits Indiana like a glove though, he’s the ideal second option to pair with a first option that can also play off ball. Hes the ideal fit in either Golden State or Indiana


What makes you confident? Pascal isn't going to re-sign in Indiana. Indiana isn't going to trade their last two lottery picks for a rental. The whole "no other team is offering their best prospect" rumours should be your first clue that what you're expecting is out of whack with reality.

I'm getting some FVV vibes from Siakam in terms of wanting the most money. If Pacers are prepared to pay up, I don't see why Siakam would leave for less money.


Fred's playing in Houston, no state tax and a FA destination. No star is willingly signing in Indiana on their 3rd deal. If this was in the bag, Indiana would pay up. Pascal will end up with weather and money.
MoneyBall
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,717
And1: 4,016
Joined: May 02, 2009

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#353 » by MoneyBall » Mon Jan 8, 2024 2:15 pm

ATLTimekeeper wrote:
MoneyBall wrote:
ATLTimekeeper wrote:
What makes you confident? Pascal isn't going to re-sign in Indiana. Indiana isn't going to trade their last two lottery picks for a rental. The whole "no other team is offering their best prospect" rumours should be your first clue that what you're expecting is out of whack with reality.

I'm getting some FVV vibes from Siakam in terms of wanting the most money. If Pacers are prepared to pay up, I don't see why Siakam would leave for less money.


Fred's playing in Houston, no state tax and a FA destination. No star is willingly signing in Indiana on their 3rd deal. If this was in the bag, Indiana would pay up. Pascal will end up with weather and money.

Fred is playing in HOU because he was guaranteed 130M over three years, not because Houston is a FA destination.

Haliburton is the real deal. Pacers could be special if they surround him with the right talent.
MoneyBall
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,717
And1: 4,016
Joined: May 02, 2009

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#354 » by MoneyBall » Mon Jan 8, 2024 2:16 pm

dTox wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't want Mathurin?

Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk

No, I'm with you.
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 42,618
And1: 23,787
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#355 » by ATLTimekeeper » Mon Jan 8, 2024 2:24 pm

MoneyBall wrote:
ATLTimekeeper wrote:
MoneyBall wrote:I'm getting some FVV vibes from Siakam in terms of wanting the most money. If Pacers are prepared to pay up, I don't see why Siakam would leave for less money.


Fred's playing in Houston, no state tax and a FA destination. No star is willingly signing in Indiana on their 3rd deal. If this was in the bag, Indiana would pay up. Pascal will end up with weather and money.

Fred is playing in HOU because he was guaranteed 130M over three years, not because Houston is a FA destination.

Haliburton is the real deal. Pacers could be special if they surround him with the right talent.


Houston is also a FA destination, though. Indiana is not. The Pacers will trade for him for rental prices. There's a lot of 'real deals' in the NBA.
Boselecta
Senior
Posts: 699
And1: 780
Joined: Aug 13, 2021
   

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#356 » by Boselecta » Mon Jan 8, 2024 2:26 pm

Unless Keegan, Kuminga + Moody, or Mathurin is on the table you tell these interested teams to f off and just resign Siakam.

No need to trade an all star for trash if these other teams are not serious about competing for a championship. If you want to win you need to take a chance like we did trading for kawhi.
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 22,385
And1: 14,281
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#357 » by Godaddycurse » Mon Jan 8, 2024 2:29 pm

MoneyBall wrote:
ATLTimekeeper wrote:
MoneyBall wrote:I'm getting some FVV vibes from Siakam in terms of wanting the most money. If Pacers are prepared to pay up, I don't see why Siakam would leave for less money.


Fred's playing in Houston, no state tax and a FA destination. No star is willingly signing in Indiana on their 3rd deal. If this was in the bag, Indiana would pay up. Pascal will end up with weather and money.

Fred is playing in HOU because he was guaranteed 130M over three years, not because Houston is a FA destination.

Haliburton is the real deal. Pacers could be special if they surround him with the right talent.


3rd yr is a team option, its not guaranteed
mtcan
RealGM
Posts: 27,880
And1: 24,299
Joined: May 19, 2001

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#358 » by mtcan » Mon Jan 8, 2024 2:31 pm

MoneyBall wrote:
dTox wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't want Mathurin?

Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk

No, I'm with you.

I wanted Mathurin more before the OG trade. I still like Mathurin as a prospect. He has had more success this season as a 6th man rather than as a starter which is making me wonder if that might be his ultimate role.

Jarace Walker is up there at the top of the list currently along with Keegan Murray. I am definitely not mad if we end up with Mathurin.
MoneyBall
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,717
And1: 4,016
Joined: May 02, 2009

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#359 » by MoneyBall » Mon Jan 8, 2024 2:32 pm

ATLTimekeeper wrote:
MoneyBall wrote:
ATLTimekeeper wrote:
Fred's playing in Houston, no state tax and a FA destination. No star is willingly signing in Indiana on their 3rd deal. If this was in the bag, Indiana would pay up. Pascal will end up with weather and money.

Fred is playing in HOU because he was guaranteed 130M over three years, not because Houston is a FA destination.

Haliburton is the real deal. Pacers could be special if they surround him with the right talent.


Houston is also a FA destination, though. Indiana is not. The Pacers will trade for him for rental prices. There's a lot of 'real deals' in the NBA.

Therefore what? Players will give up millions upon millions of dollars because of the weather? Giannis re-signed with Milwaukee. DeRozan re-signed with Toronto.

The weather in Indiana isn't even that bad lol.
MoneyBall
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,717
And1: 4,016
Joined: May 02, 2009

Re: Pascal Siakam Trade Speculation Thread 

Post#360 » by MoneyBall » Mon Jan 8, 2024 2:34 pm

Godaddycurse wrote:
MoneyBall wrote:
ATLTimekeeper wrote:
Fred's playing in Houston, no state tax and a FA destination. No star is willingly signing in Indiana on their 3rd deal. If this was in the bag, Indiana would pay up. Pascal will end up with weather and money.

Fred is playing in HOU because he was guaranteed 130M over three years, not because Houston is a FA destination.

Haliburton is the real deal. Pacers could be special if they surround him with the right talent.


3rd yr is a team option, its not guaranteed

I stand corrected.

FVV still chased money, though.

Return to Toronto Raptors