Chandan wrote:i dont think you can say IQ's ceiling is higher than OG, given OG is probably the perfect 3 and D player, unless IQ can somehow become a bonafide all star lead guard.
I don’t know how we are determining their ceilings but whatever OG’s ceiling is I would argue he’s as close to it as he will get. Even if Quickley’s ceiling is lower it’s clear that he hasn’t finished developing.
IQ may never become an All-Defensive Team selection but he’s a good defender and when you factor in his offence I think he has All-Star potential.
As a basketball player, I would argue that Quickley is as good or better than OG in all areas unrelated to his size (i.e., defensive versatility), with the exception of steals. The difference in steals could be the result of guarding point-of-attack vs. off-ball and I’m not even sure how that breaks down for each player.
With respect to rebounding, OG only averages around 1 more per game in his career than IQ, split 0.5 and 0.5 between offensive and defensive boards. It is a small sample size but IQ’s rebounding numbers are comparable since coming to Toronto.
The most significant difference between them, and it is a massive difference, is that IQ is a 3-level scorer who can be a legitimate primary offensive threat. OG is an elite 3&D player but his career 3P% is only 0.03% higher than IQ’s and this season Quickley is shooting a higher 3P% on almost identical volume. OG’s offensive game is basically high-level 3 point shooting. In 7 years his ball-handling and offensive repertoire has not developed to the point where he can reliably or effectively attack off the dribble; this is quite evident from his limited 1 move attacks and frequent straight line charges.
In the end they are both very good players who play different roles and the trade addresses weaknesses on both teams without creating significant team deficiencies with the outgoing player. A very rare win-win.