TimberKat wrote:winforlose wrote:So crazy thought. Knicks lose Randle for weeks or more and a very promising season is in jeopardy. Knicks are rolling with OG and let’s say they go all in. Knicks give the Wolves 5 firsts, Julius Randle, and Fournier’s money and tell us to go find a third or fourth team to give us the players we want. Would you guys be tempted?
If I could flip the picks and Randle for Murray and Markkanen. Yes.
I have been having this discussion on the NYK and trade board threads. The deal is basically Mitchell Robinson instead of Randle, but everything else holds true, and the money still works.
Wolves out: Karl Anthony Towns, protections on the 2029 first dropped.
Wolves in: Lauri Markkanen and Dejounte Murray.
Knicks out: Julius Randle, Evan Fournier, 5 firsts
Knicks in: Karl Anthony Towns
Jazz out: Markkanen, THT, one first round pick
Jazz in: Julius Randle, 4 firsts, protections dropped on Wolves 2029 first,
Hawks out: Murray
Hawks in: Fournier, THT, 1 NYK first, A first from either Cleveland or Minnesota unprotected
Why for the Wolves: Murray and Markkanen save money off of KAT’s deal. They together give the Wolves the fire power we are missing and the PG depth we need. Murray/Ant/McDaniels/Markkanen/Gobert is hands down the best lineup in the west.
Why for the Knicks: KAT is a massive upgrade over Randle. The consistency he brings and the improved defense is not only helpful this year, but next year when Robinson is back. You are talking about being able to run a successful two towers, or moving Robinson and still having an All NBA center. Meanwhile Brunson/DDV/OG/KAT/IH is a scary lineup in the East. This lineup has scoring, rim protection, rebounding, and defense. The money is an issue next year, but NY can handle an expensive team with a big market to support it. Moreover, KAT would be a huge draw.
Why for the Jazz: They get another Gobert sized package for Markkanen and Randle isn’t exactly value less. The Jazz are straddling two worlds right now. One of them is serious patience in a rebuild. The other is win now. I don’t think either is going to go well if the Jazz end up around 8-9 for the next few years and exit in the first, assuming they make it out of the play in. This adds even more assets to the rebuild and even more trade power in the years to come.
Why for the Hawks: They get expiring contracts, 2 unprotected firsts for Murray, and get to reset.
The picks in question can be played with by anyone interested. I am thinking the Dallas pick to Utah along with 2 unprotected NYK picks, and the final Utah pick is unclear. It could be a protected NYK pick much later or it could be a 2024 protected pick whose protections weaken over time. However the reader wants to input it. Thoughts and opinions?