MagicTownBaller wrote:Here's a serious question, we were trying to win this year, how long until Mosley is on the hot seat?
Why would he be on the hot seat?
Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCFJayBird, UCF, Knightro

MagicTownBaller wrote:Here's a serious question, we were trying to win this year, how long until Mosley is on the hot seat?

SOUL wrote:Wemby is going to destroy WCJ.
3Pac wrote:sorry for bad english am from pennsylvania

MagicTownBaller wrote:Here's a serious question, we were trying to win this year, how long until Mosley is on the hot seat?
Knightro wrote:thelead wrote:ORLMagicGirl15 wrote:Why did we go for a 3?
Franz panicked. Clock started ticking and he had to chase the ball and still get a shot off. He could have passed it but he panicked. Can't blame him too much there.
I'm hard pressed to blame him.
Franz grabbed the ball with his back to the basket like 35 feet from the bucket with 1.9 seconds left.
*Maybe* he could have dribbled once to try and get closer, but Williams and Kleber were right on Banchero so there wasn't really a pass to be made.

SOUL wrote:Wemby is going to destroy WCJ.
Now that I think about it though. What about the other way around. Say Im down and its under 24 secs. I cant foul to get the ball back with that ruleogmagicfan wrote:IllMagic04 wrote:Do you have a rule change ideaogmagicfan wrote:
change the rules? make it not smart to do anymore
its anticlimatic & makes games longer than they need to
Sent from my SM-G970U using RealGM Forums mobile app
Intentional fouling in the last 3 minutes of the game are treated like technicals in that they give the team a FT & the ball



3Pac wrote:sorry for bad english am from pennsylvania

richi_v25 wrote:What was the point of starting Issac if he played great and didn't get hurt but they limited him to 8 minutes? I feel like another 10-15 minutes of his and we win especially in that horrible 3rd.



thelead wrote:He played two minutes in the 2nd quarter. I'm pretty sure he had landed awkwardly after some contact in that second stretch. I wonder if they just decided to play it safe if he mentioned tweaking something, even if it was minor. It doesn't make any sense to plan to play him 6 minutes in the 1st and 2 minutes in the 2nd.

thelead wrote:richi_v25 wrote:What was the point of starting Issac if he played great and didn't get hurt but they limited him to 8 minutes? I feel like another 10-15 minutes of his and we win especially in that horrible 3rd.
He played two minutes in the 2nd quarter. I'm pretty sure he had landed awkwardly after some contact in that second stretch. I wonder if they just decided to play it safe if he mentioned tweaking something, even if it was minor. It doesn't make any sense to plan to play him 6 minutes in the 1st and 2 minutes in the 2nd.