thebuzzardman wrote:Too much positivity in here
It's a new day, YES it is!
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
thebuzzardman wrote:Too much positivity in here
egelband wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Remember how we needed to acquire depth for the front line?
We did.
OG and Precious have given us that depth.
Precious is a great pick-up. He's showing signs that he can more than a junkyard dog. Very pleased with his game tonight.
Also, Sims played well too. He was bodying the Jazz and even showed a few moves of his own. He was always a project player and now he is stepping up.
Knicks appear to be developing players and putting guys in appropriate roles. This and the scouting has to be the story of this front office. I’m thoroughly impressed.
I really see no reason for them to make a big move here. Fournier and a pick for an excellent bench piece. I wouldn’t **** with this team’s chemistry now.
god shammgod wrote:i think the knicks end up with burks because they don't want to give up any 1sts. it is a problem going forward contract wise but i don't think they're gonna pay the price for any of these other guys.
Clyde_Style wrote:2020 wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:
Grimes is waking dafuq up!!!!
I agree. Jerry West's prediction of him being better than Barrett is starting to show.
I like when he attacks the rim. And when his 3 is going, we look unbeatable.
I think Grimes is a keeper. It may be better to see if he develops more before trading him. That way if he does develop, we can probably use him to grab a star.
During his offensive struggles he has always been an important defender for us. He remains a top defender and his assignments often struggle to score against him which adds to his net value on the floor. With an uptick in scoring again, he becomes a major plus.
I see no reason to trade him since he can function with any unit. If that only results in him being a tradeable asset, then so be it, but I think he can be a key piece for us long-term.
This continued high level play with Randle and OG off the floor should open everyone's eyes to the value of depth. Some rash folks have consistently stated we have little talent on the bench. They're just flat out wrong.
This is why a long-term vision and player development results in championship rosters. You need to have guys who all buy in and stay ready for when their number is called. Our culture is winning and for that I give Thibs the props.
So all the cats in here who spew crappy hot takes every time Grimes clanks a jumper can call him trash until he proves them wrong. Talent evaluation is for level headed people who can see past the struggles. Grimes is a two-way talent and with some patience he will reward the team for sticking by him.
sol537 wrote:Grimes defense has been great. We should hold onto him IMO. A guy like Caruso to take McBride’s minutes may be the way to go…
Ray Williams wrote:egelband wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Remember how we needed to acquire depth for the front line?
We did.
OG and Precious have given us that depth.
Precious is a great pick-up. He's showing signs that he can more than a junkyard dog. Very pleased with his game tonight.
Also, Sims played well too. He was bodying the Jazz and even showed a few moves of his own. He was always a project player and now he is stepping up.
Knicks appear to be developing players and putting guys in appropriate roles. This and the scouting has to be the story of this front office. I’m thoroughly impressed.
I really see no reason for them to make a big move here. Fournier and a pick for an excellent bench piece. I wouldn’t **** with this team’s chemistry now.
The question is who does the player we acquire replace in the rotation? The way Deuce is playing you can’t bench him. Grimes is the most likely candidate and if that’s the case then include him in the trade and make sure the player we are getting back is a no doubt about it improvement.
Jeff Van Gully wrote:
They’re also gon get this work.
Reign23 wrote:god shammgod wrote:i think the knicks end up with burks because they don't want to give up any 1sts. it is a problem going forward contract wise but i don't think they're gonna pay the price for any of these other guys.
yep, my guess 2.
mpharris36 wrote:Reign23 wrote:god shammgod wrote:i think the knicks end up with burks because they don't want to give up any 1sts. it is a problem going forward contract wise but i don't think they're gonna pay the price for any of these other guys.
yep, my guess 2.
Burks contract just doesn't fit.
You either have to make a bigger trade with Fournier in it. Or a smaller trade with Precious on it.
Knicks are not trading Fournier for an expiring they have operated that they want to trade for a star and they NEED that Fournier contract or whoever they trade him for to be added salary in the next trade.
And they be stupid to trade precious for Burks.
The Burks contract just doesn't make sense because we can't fit it in to our plans.
robillionaire wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Truth hurts Folksssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Interesting
Richard4444 wrote:What about TJ McConnell + Isaiah Jackson and our most liked filler Obi Toppin for Evan + Grimes + Dallas pick.
It's not the soundest trade for a continuous soup strategy but gives us a lot of depth.
Jose7 wrote:And let’s stop acting like this was a good team
Prior to the OG trade..we were pretty much .500 addition by subtraction eliminating the Barrett Randle duo..ther was never going to work clearly