pipfan wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:pipfan wrote:Come on now-you know that trade you suggested is crazy bad for Chi. Caruso is a top 5 role player in the league on an excellent contract. Lavine is an efficient 25 pt scorer over many years
If his deal is too big, Chi just keeps him. NO WAY they use Caruso to dump Lavine. Would rather trade DDR instead
No, he's asking if you if saw the same reports we saw. I think that has to be a yes as closely as you follow Chicago. Yet you still proposed Chicago getting full salary relief, a prospect, and a pick.
Maybe he over corrected but I don't think the market for LaVine is as robust as you seem to and definitely not GSW, maybe the Lakers are desperate enough, but they still shouldn't overpay when the market has been pretty clear on LaVine.
Sure, I know what he's saying. I think we all know there is no way Chi will just dump Lavine. Is his value great-of course not. But he's a marginal All Star in his prime. And to attach Caruso to dump him-that's crazy.
I think we should trade DDR to Philly and keep Lavine, if no one wants him. CWhite/Lavine is a nice backcourt-it's the Lavine/DDR pairing that we struggle with.
It's not as much about the play on the court, although that does factor in, it's the contract. With this new CBA that contract is brutal.
The major plus for Lavine is scoring and he is scoring under 20 per game in this super scoring season.
Perhaps Caruso was too much. BUT the money the Bulls save can't just be ignored by us fans as much as we do just because it's not our money.
The Bulls not only save this year, they wipe the slate clean and instantly become major FA players with Coby White and Patrick Williams.
Personally I would want to have cap the following year with so many guys become UFA like Tatum/Mitchell/Ingram/Murray plus the draft class of 2021.
Anyway, if you think you can get a greater return for Caruso on his own when you minus the asset(s) it's going to take to get off Lavine then that's ok. I understand that and it's close.
I'm not certain Lavine/DDR can go together. Not unless more bad money is coming back. Bulls would need $54m coming back at minimum and if you're asking the other team to take on that much extra money they're going to ask for compensation.