pingpongrac wrote:Harcore Fenton Mun wrote:pingpongrac wrote:
Lmao what? Siakam at 27 becoming an All-Star/All-NBA player severely outweighs a couple of bad picks in the 20s (Bruno and Flynn) as well as a few early 2nds that didn't pan out (Daniels and Koloko) on his own while OG at 23 becoming a premier 3+D wing was a massive hit too. Powell at 46 becoming one of the best bench scorers in the league and a guy who can get you 15-20 points on high efficiency most nights was a huge hit as well even if some of his best years in the NBA have come outside of Toronto. Poeltl and Delon were good picks at 9 and 20 while Scottie was a homerun at 4 and it is way too early to even judge Gradey at 13. It's pointless to bring up 3 "failed" picks at #59 or a few others at 46/47 where 90% of players picked in that range don't make it beyond their first NBA contract or contribute meaningfully for more than a few seasons anyway.
It's about a 33% hit rate. Think about that while we tank.
When half of your picks are being made in the 2nd round – with most of those coming in the 45-60 range – you're not going to hit on every pick. 8 of 16 picks since 2014 have come in the 2nd round accounting for the majority of misses in that span.
And if you want to talk about a 33% hit rate and compare things to a baseball player, think of it this way: are you really going to complain about a .333 average while being near the top of the league in extra base hits?
The problem is, if the draft's poor. You're stuck turning water into wine. You can't turn a mutt into a purebred.




















