bstein14 wrote:Invictus88 wrote:I just don't see the point in included Killian in any trade. Does any team view him of having positive value?
The only reason I could see would be as dumpable salary filler to make a bigger trade work / as a way of absorbing a more onerous contract in return along with picks...
You could have said the same thing about Bagley 3.5 years after being drafted by the Kings he wasn't playing and Cade's(and Bagley's) agent blasted the Kings for not trading him and not playing him. Then the Kings found a GM dumb enough to not only give up multiple 2nd round picks for him but also a decent backup rotation player for him.
Ok, bagley sucks and all, but he was a 14/7 guy for 3 years before he was benched and eventually traded. Killian hasn't shown anything resembling nba level production.