Fat Kat wrote:
He's the 3rd option!!! But seriously, the Knicks better not be banking on DDV suddenly finding the fountain of offensive prowess and back off adding another proven offensive shot creator.
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
Fat Kat wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:He says it in the post game all the time. Winning is all that matters...and he coaches to win each and every time he is out there. I get thats a mindset that needed to be instilled into our team when winning was not at a premium. However now that our team is getting better and our goals are changing a bit...you do have to realize a win is a win but at what cost to the greater picture?
DOT wrote:mpharris36 wrote:And if you want to say hey we are winning...I get it...but also realize he's been down this road before...both his Twolves and Bulls teams always limped to the finish line in the playoffs because of his reckless coaching in the regular season.
I get it we love winning...and he has instilled that every game is important and changed the culture. We also are at a point where playoffs are now more important than a singular regular season game. And I don't think that is in Thibs DNA to realize that because injuries have always creeped up with his teams leading up to the playoffs.
That simply isn't a coincidence...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrrhic_victory
mpharris36 wrote:HEZI wrote:You kind of have to hold everybody accountable including trainers, medical staff and players themselves. Players are allowed to say they are a no go if they aren’t feeling right. Nobody can force a player to play if he’s not able to. Also the medical team and trainers are responsible for helping determine who should and shouldn’t play.
But also let’s not act like players aren’t looking to achieve goals and accolades which help with their bonuses in their contracts. Players will put their health at risk if it means chasing certain personal achievements that results in more money for them. There are a lot of factors and not all of it is just as simple as Thibs is nuts. Thibs is nuts but at the same time if you don’t think Brunson isn’t also chasing an All NBA accolade then you are nuts too. If you don’t think Hartenstein isn’t chasing a nice pay check then you are nuts too.
its def not just a one way street. But if the rumors are true and Thibs soured on Grimes in the playoffs because he didn't play through an injury...you can also have guys worried about being put in the doghouse if they don't have the thibs mindset...win at all costs.
So yes, players def want to play...however sometimes as a coach you need to protect your players even against themselves.
mpharris36 wrote:jvsimonetti0514 wrote:mpharris36 wrote:there are def freak injuries and I wont blame everything on thibs but to act like thibs is a "normal" HC in terms of minutes distribution and playing through injuries for regular season wins is also being a little facetious as well.
Mitch had no business going back into the game after getting hurt - reckless HC decision from thibs
Grimes had no business going back into the game after getting hurt - reckless HC decision from thibs
if you argue against either you aren't being fair. I can make the case Randle shouldn't have been out there vs the heat but lets not even put that on him.
Thibs also needs to read the game (like he says himself). We were up 20 and the starters were just going through the motions...that does tend to lead to more odd injuries because players aren't focused. He could have trusted other guys to manage the bigger lead because they will still play hard and defend vs a bad grizzlies team.
I'm not going to blame the Brunson injury on him because a turned ankle can happen at anytime. But there are clear cases of negligent coaching from him. And if you want to say hey we are winning...I get it...but also realize he's been down this road before...both his Twolves and Bulls teams always limped to the finish line in the playoffs because of his reckless coaching in the regular season.
I get it we love winning...and he has instilled that every game is important and changed the culture. We also are at a point where playoffs are now more important than a singular regular season game. And I don't think that is in Thibs DNA to realize that because injuries have always creeped up with his teams leading up to the playoffs.
That simply isn't a coincidence...
Do you think the players have no say on whether they can go back into the game after they’re injured? I always imagine that the player and the training staff made the decision and relayed their availability to the coach. I think it’s more likely that Mitch and grimes thought they felt better on the sideline and wanted to get back out there, when they shouldn’t have than Thibs dragging them back onto the floor. That’s not to say running an 8 man rotation in February is a good idea and is going to add more wear and tear on their bodies. It’s obvious a valid discussion about finding minutes for Evan, Flynn, and Toppin but I don’t think Thibs is trotting these guys out there against their will.
when there are multiple reports that Thibs sours on guys if they don't play through injuries...you can maybe see why guys would probably try to fight to get back out there.
j4remi wrote:When we talk about fatigue, I know Thibs is very obvious and all but... We also played the most back-to-backs up through January 1st (and then some I believe), and had a brutal schedule overall. That's not to vindicate Thibs, but this schedule woulda taken a pound of flesh from anyone.
Which brings me to my main point: F*** Adam Silver
3toheadmelo wrote:moocow007 wrote:This is another example of why I keep pushing for another primary offensive option. It's clear (at least to me) that Thibs is riding the few guys that he has that he can rely on creating offense (considering his system is not based on offensive play calling). There is more than enough "shots to go around". Just look at the minutes and the rotation he's been using. They need another primary offensive option. So not Bruce Brown and the like but rather someone that can get 20 points a night on any given night.
no caruso either. these guys make no sense.
NowWHYcee7 wrote:I looked up minutes and usage and Thibs doesn’t play his top guns anymore than other teams. Idk, I think it’s a little overblown.
I do think Brunson should have sat last night though, I think I said that in the game thread before the game.
Anyway if I were the Knicks right now I’d rest JB until after the break
Chanel Bomber wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:moocow007 wrote:This is another example of why I keep pushing for another primary offensive option. It's clear (at least to me) that Thibs is riding the few guys that he has that he can rely on creating offense (considering his system is not based on offensive play calling). There is more than enough "shots to go around". Just look at the minutes and the rotation he's been using. They need another primary offensive option. So not Bruce Brown and the like but rather someone that can get 20 points a night on any given night.
no caruso either. these guys make no sense.
I think Caruso is such a game-changer defensively that I could see him being an acquisition that makes a fully healthy Knicks a legit Finals contender.
Shot creation would concentrate in the hands of Brunson, Randle and as a distant third DDV. That's a lot of shots/playmaking for 3 players, I agree.
But with Caruso (in addition to OG, Mitch, iHart, Hart), the success of the team would primarily rest on defense.
I too would like to see another scorer join the team but Caruso would be one of those exceptions.
moocow007 wrote:j4remi wrote:When we talk about fatigue, I know Thibs is very obvious and all but... We also played the most back-to-backs up through January 1st (and then some I believe), and had a brutal schedule overall. That's not to vindicate Thibs, but this schedule woulda taken a pound of flesh from anyone.
Which brings me to my main point: F*** Adam Silver
That doesn't help but Thibs has been basically playing a 7 man rotation for the most part and been riding Randle and Brunson to around 40 minutes a game during the streak (with OG close behind). Even if both guys didn't get injured come playoff time they are going to be beat. They need help and not from just another role playing defender that can shoot a 3 now and then (Bruce Brown for example). Can't change Thibs and can't fire him right now.
cgmw wrote:
Except Hartenstein is playing with achilles tendinitis from being the only 7 footer who runs the same mileage per game as Steph Curry.
Gravy wrote:NowWHYcee7 wrote:I looked up minutes and usage and Thibs doesn’t play his top guns anymore than other teams. Idk, I think it’s a little overblown.
I do think Brunson should have sat last night though, I think I said that in the game thread before the game.
Anyway if I were the Knicks right now I’d rest JB until after the break
For the month of January, Brunson is averaging 35 mpg including two missed games when he is supposedly being played 40+ minutes every night. That's how made up narratives becomes facts
3toheadmelo wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:no caruso either. these guys make no sense.
I think Caruso is such a game-changer defensively that I could see him being an acquisition that makes a fully healthy Knicks a legit Finals contender.
Shot creation would concentrate in the hands of Brunson, Randle and as a distant third DDV. That's a lot of shots/playmaking for 3 players, I agree.
But with Caruso (in addition to OG, Mitch, iHart, Hart), the success of the team would primarily rest on defense.
I too would like to see another scorer join the team but Caruso would be one of those exceptions.
i don't trust donte as a 3rd option at all. he has that type of jr smith game that ends up being trash in the post season.
also the bulls want an "og package" for caruso. meaning we'd have to give up grimes and deuce as well, our best assets. i'd pass. caruso is good but grimes and deuce do practically the same things.
Chanel Bomber wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:I think Caruso is such a game-changer defensively that I could see him being an acquisition that makes a fully healthy Knicks a legit Finals contender.
Shot creation would concentrate in the hands of Brunson, Randle and as a distant third DDV. That's a lot of shots/playmaking for 3 players, I agree.
But with Caruso (in addition to OG, Mitch, iHart, Hart), the success of the team would primarily rest on defense.
I too would like to see another scorer join the team but Caruso would be one of those exceptions.
i don't trust donte as a 3rd option at all. he has that type of jr smith game that ends up being trash in the post season.
also the bulls want an "og package" for caruso. meaning we'd have to give up grimes and deuce as well, our best assets. i'd pass. caruso is good but grimes and deuce do practically the same things.
I think Caruso is on whole other level than Grimes and McBride right now.
If all it took was Grimes, McBride, and our 2024 first, I think it would be a no-brainer. But they're seeking more than that, so depending on the details, could get dicey.
3toheadmelo wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:i don't trust donte as a 3rd option at all. he has that type of jr smith game that ends up being trash in the post season.
also the bulls want an "og package" for caruso. meaning we'd have to give up grimes and deuce as well, our best assets. i'd pass. caruso is good but grimes and deuce do practically the same things.
I think Caruso is on whole other level than Grimes and McBride right now.
If all it took was Grimes, McBride, and our 2024 first, I think it would be a no-brainer. But they're seeking more than that, so depending on the details, could get dicey.
jerry west > caruso
Chanel Bomber wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:I think Caruso is on whole other level than Grimes and McBride right now.
If all it took was Grimes, McBride, and our 2024 first, I think it would be a no-brainer. But they're seeking more than that, so depending on the details, could get dicey.
jerry west > caruso
Fine, you win.
Jeff Van Gully wrote:cgmw wrote:
Except Hartenstein is playing with achilles tendinitis from being the only 7 footer who runs the same mileage per game as Steph Curry.
you talking about the achilles condition he came to the team with? yes, also thibs fault.