Moderators: Dirk, HMFFL, Mavrelous
BliscoSantos wrote:Lakers will be targeting Young,Mitchell and Kyrie in the offseason....I think Kyrie will the last resort if they can't get the other two...Mitchell is probably NY bound(Knicks or Brooklyn) ,Young could head to LA...it seems Snyder prefers Murray(he's been playing good and is on abetter contract)... Hawks could be willing to let Trey go
Bob8 wrote:Archx wrote:Bob8 wrote:
I insist, what about Dinwiddie? If you're not sure, you can look at your last year's posts.
THJ with D would be worth near max. Luka with D would be in conversation for GOAT. Kyrie playing 70+ games would never came in Mavs. Dinwiddie worth his contract wouldn't never been waived.
Dinwiddie wasn't anything special on defense, that's true, but i think he did try vs Luka the other day and didn't to that bad. He wasn't good in playoffs on defense but i think he's taller or at least longer than THJ which can benefit him. But to answer your question straight up, i would rather see Dinwiddie on defense than THJ and i would also trust him with the ball a lot more since THJ is a like a Wile E. Coyote out there.
No, you have been saying that he's disaster in D.And he was.
There's only 1 problem, Mavs far the best position is Pg, do we really need another Pg on the team? I don't care for this year, but you can bet that Dinwiddie will come only, if they promise him new solid contract. So there's going away possible upgrade on the wing. Him being very friendly with Kidd is meaning 1 more support for our beloved coach.
Mavrelous wrote:BliscoSantos wrote:Lakers will be targeting Young,Mitchell and Kyrie in the offseason....I think Kyrie will the last resort if they can't get the other two...Mitchell is probably NY bound(Knicks or Brooklyn) ,Young could head to LA...it seems Snyder prefers Murray(he's been playing good and is on abetter contract)... Hawks could be willing to let Trey go
They can't get the other 2.
BliscoSantos wrote:Lakers will be targeting Young,Mitchell and Kyrie in the offseason....I think Kyrie will the last resort if they can't get the other two...Mitchell is probably NY bound(Knicks or Brooklyn) ,Young could head to LA...it seems Snyder prefers Murray(he's been playing good and is on abetter contract)... Hawks could be willing to let Trey go
Mr B wrote:Bob8 wrote:Archx wrote:
Dinwiddie wasn't anything special on defense, that's true, but i think he did try vs Luka the other day and didn't to that bad. He wasn't good in playoffs on defense but i think he's taller or at least longer than THJ which can benefit him. But to answer your question straight up, i would rather see Dinwiddie on defense than THJ and i would also trust him with the ball a lot more since THJ is a like a Wile E. Coyote out there.
No, you have been saying that he's disaster in D.
There's only 1 problem, Mavs far the best position is Pg, do we really need another Pg on the team? I don't care for this year, but you can bet that Dinwiddie will come only, if they promise him new solid contract. So there's going away possible upgrade on the wing. Him being very friendly with Kidd is meaning 1 more support for our beloved coach.
Dinwiddie also brings scoring and bench scoring specifically. Are you ok depending on THJ to be your main bench scorer?
Bob8 wrote:Mr B wrote:Bob8 wrote:
No, you have been saying that he's disaster in D.
There's only 1 problem, Mavs far the best position is Pg, do we really need another Pg on the team? I don't care for this year, but you can bet that Dinwiddie will come only, if they promise him new solid contract. So there's going away possible upgrade on the wing. Him being very friendly with Kidd is meaning 1 more support for our beloved coach.
Dinwiddie also brings scoring and bench scoring specifically. Are you ok depending on THJ to be your main bench scorer?
I don't understand why would a team with 2 superstars and Exum, who is better than Dinwiddie, have 4th player in the same position, while being very thin on wings?
On 1 and 2 you have Luka playing 35+ minutes, Kyrie 30+ minutes and that leaves less than 30 minutes for Exum and Josh, Hardy being backup. Where are minutes for Dinwiddie? Yes injuries and I would be ecstatic if we could get Dinwiddie as a backup for cheap. But we won't.
I believe Dinwiddie will come in Dallas only, if they promise him substantial new contract next year and playing time. That would be basically end of cinderella story for Exum. Which is bad for Mavs, because he's much better fit with his D and much cheaper too.
Mavs need to spend money for the wings not another Pg.
Exum is also out again tomorrow. Cinderella story ended on him about a month ago when he turned back into Exum.Archx wrote:Bob8 wrote:Mr B wrote:Dinwiddie also brings scoring and bench scoring specifically. Are you ok depending on THJ to be your main bench scorer?
I don't understand why would a team with 2 superstars and Exum, who is better than Dinwiddie, have 4th player in the same position, while being very thin on wings?
On 1 and 2 you have Luka playing 35+ minutes, Kyrie 30+ minutes and that leaves less than 30 minutes for Exum and Josh, Hardy being backup. Where are minutes for Dinwiddie? Yes injuries and I would be ecstatic if we could get Dinwiddie as a backup for cheap. But we won't.
I believe Dinwiddie will come in Dallas only, if they promise him substantial new contract next year and playing time. That would be basically end of cinderella story for Exum. Which is bad for Mavs, because he's much better fit with his D and much cheaper too.
Mavs need to spend money for the wings not another Pg.
I think that Exum played SF a lot of times and it worked just fine.
Luka, Kyrie, Exum is not a bad lineup if you need extra defense, on offense i think that Dinwiddie is still better than Exum. But he's basically a 6th guy so most likely we would see Dinwiddie, Exum combinations since Green starts with Kyrie and Luka. I'm not sure why you are worried so much.
Kidd will continue doing what he's been doing now. He'll juggle Hardy and THJ in all of that, depends who plays better.
ejs78 wrote:Exum is also out again tomorrow. Cinderella story ended on him about a month ago when he turned back into Exum.Archx wrote:Bob8 wrote:
I don't understand why would a team with 2 superstars and Exum, who is better than Dinwiddie, have 4th player in the same position, while being very thin on wings?
On 1 and 2 you have Luka playing 35+ minutes, Kyrie 30+ minutes and that leaves less than 30 minutes for Exum and Josh, Hardy being backup. Where are minutes for Dinwiddie? Yes injuries and I would be ecstatic if we could get Dinwiddie as a backup for cheap. But we won't.
I believe Dinwiddie will come in Dallas only, if they promise him substantial new contract next year and playing time. That would be basically end of cinderella story for Exum. Which is bad for Mavs, because he's much better fit with his D and much cheaper too.
Mavs need to spend money for the wings not another Pg.
I think that Exum played SF a lot of times and it worked just fine.
Luka, Kyrie, Exum is not a bad lineup if you need extra defense, on offense i think that Dinwiddie is still better than Exum. But he's basically a 6th guy so most likely we would see Dinwiddie, Exum combinations since Green starts with Kyrie and Luka. I'm not sure why you are worried so much.
Kidd will continue doing what he's been doing now. He'll juggle Hardy and THJ in all of that, depends who plays better.
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM Forums mobile app
Archx wrote:Bob8 wrote:Mr B wrote:Dinwiddie also brings scoring and bench scoring specifically. Are you ok depending on THJ to be your main bench scorer?
I don't understand why would a team with 2 superstars and Exum, who is better than Dinwiddie, have 4th player in the same position, while being very thin on wings?
On 1 and 2 you have Luka playing 35+ minutes, Kyrie 30+ minutes and that leaves less than 30 minutes for Exum and Josh, Hardy being backup. Where are minutes for Dinwiddie? Yes injuries and I would be ecstatic if we could get Dinwiddie as a backup for cheap. But we won't.
I believe Dinwiddie will come in Dallas only, if they promise him substantial new contract next year and playing time. That would be basically end of cinderella story for Exum. Which is bad for Mavs, because he's much better fit with his D and much cheaper too.
Mavs need to spend money for the wings not another Pg.
I think that Exum played SF a lot of times and it worked just fine.
Luka, Kyrie, Exum is not a bad lineup if you need extra defense, on offense i think that Dinwiddie is still better than Exum. But he's basically a 6th guy so most likely we would see Dinwiddie, Exum combinations since Green starts with Kyrie and Luka. I'm not sure why you are worried so much.
Kidd will continue doing what he's been doing now. He'll juggle Hardy and THJ in all of that, depends who plays better.
Archx wrote:ejs78 wrote:Exum is also out again tomorrow. Cinderella story ended on him about a month ago when he turned back into Exum.Archx wrote:
I think that Exum played SF a lot of times and it worked just fine.
Luka, Kyrie, Exum is not a bad lineup if you need extra defense, on offense i think that Dinwiddie is still better than Exum. But he's basically a 6th guy so most likely we would see Dinwiddie, Exum combinations since Green starts with Kyrie and Luka. I'm not sure why you are worried so much.
Kidd will continue doing what he's been doing now. He'll juggle Hardy and THJ in all of that, depends who plays better.
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM Forums mobile app
Yep. I also said in previous posts that i don't really trust Exum to be always ready because these nagging injuries just won't go away anymore. Luckily Green picked up his game and if Dinwiddie signs tomorrow then it will be a very amazing off season+trade deadline.
Bob8 wrote:Archx wrote:Bob8 wrote:
I don't understand why would a team with 2 superstars and Exum, who is better than Dinwiddie, have 4th player in the same position, while being very thin on wings?
On 1 and 2 you have Luka playing 35+ minutes, Kyrie 30+ minutes and that leaves less than 30 minutes for Exum and Josh, Hardy being backup. Where are minutes for Dinwiddie? Yes injuries and I would be ecstatic if we could get Dinwiddie as a backup for cheap. But we won't.
I believe Dinwiddie will come in Dallas only, if they promise him substantial new contract next year and playing time. That would be basically end of cinderella story for Exum. Which is bad for Mavs, because he's much better fit with his D and much cheaper too.
Mavs need to spend money for the wings not another Pg.
I think that Exum played SF a lot of times and it worked just fine.
Luka, Kyrie, Exum is not a bad lineup if you need extra defense, on offense i think that Dinwiddie is still better than Exum. But he's basically a 6th guy so most likely we would see Dinwiddie, Exum combinations since Green starts with Kyrie and Luka. I'm not sure why you are worried so much.
Kidd will continue doing what he's been doing now. He'll juggle Hardy and THJ in all of that, depends who plays better.
It doesn't matter where he played, you still have THJ, who's more 2 than 3. Maybe you see the pattern, numerous guards and very few wings. But hay, just bring another guard and then complain that Kidd is playing too small.
ejs78 wrote:Exum is also out again tomorrow. Cinderella story ended on him about a month ago when he turned back into Exum.Archx wrote:Bob8 wrote:
I don't understand why would a team with 2 superstars and Exum, who is better than Dinwiddie, have 4th player in the same position, while being very thin on wings?
On 1 and 2 you have Luka playing 35+ minutes, Kyrie 30+ minutes and that leaves less than 30 minutes for Exum and Josh, Hardy being backup. Where are minutes for Dinwiddie? Yes injuries and I would be ecstatic if we could get Dinwiddie as a backup for cheap. But we won't.
I believe Dinwiddie will come in Dallas only, if they promise him substantial new contract next year and playing time. That would be basically end of cinderella story for Exum. Which is bad for Mavs, because he's much better fit with his D and much cheaper too.
Mavs need to spend money for the wings not another Pg.
I think that Exum played SF a lot of times and it worked just fine.
Luka, Kyrie, Exum is not a bad lineup if you need extra defense, on offense i think that Dinwiddie is still better than Exum. But he's basically a 6th guy so most likely we would see Dinwiddie, Exum combinations since Green starts with Kyrie and Luka. I'm not sure why you are worried so much.
Kidd will continue doing what he's been doing now. He'll juggle Hardy and THJ in all of that, depends who plays better.
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM Forums mobile app
But interesting enough nobody complains about his availability. I guess max. player has some privilege, which minimum players hasn't.ejs78 wrote:Bob8 wrote:Archx wrote:
I think that Exum played SF a lot of times and it worked just fine.
Luka, Kyrie, Exum is not a bad lineup if you need extra defense, on offense i think that Dinwiddie is still better than Exum. But he's basically a 6th guy so most likely we would see Dinwiddie, Exum combinations since Green starts with Kyrie and Luka. I'm not sure why you are worried so much.
Kidd will continue doing what he's been doing now. He'll juggle Hardy and THJ in all of that, depends who plays better.
It doesn't matter where he played, you still have THJ, who's more 2 than 3. Maybe you see the pattern, numerous guards and very few wings. But hay, just bring another guard and then complain that Kidd is playing too small.
What wing do you suggest they sign?
Bob8 wrote:Exum has still played more games than max. player Kyrie.
Bob8 wrote:ejs78 wrote:Bob8 wrote:
It doesn't matter where he played, you still have THJ, who's more 2 than 3. Maybe you see the pattern, numerous guards and very few wings. But hay, just bring another guard and then complain that Kidd is playing too small.
What wing do you suggest they sign?
I would go with someone, who was waived recently, knowing how those players are appreciated by Mavs' fans.
Maverick41 wrote:Bob8 wrote:Exum has still played more games than max. player Kyrie.
Huh? Almost everyone on this board have complained one way or another about Kyries availability. The only ones that haven't are the Kyrie stans.
Bob8 wrote:ejs78 wrote:Exum is also out again tomorrow. Cinderella story ended on him about a month ago when he turned back into Exum.Archx wrote:
I think that Exum played SF a lot of times and it worked just fine.
Luka, Kyrie, Exum is not a bad lineup if you need extra defense, on offense i think that Dinwiddie is still better than Exum. But he's basically a 6th guy so most likely we would see Dinwiddie, Exum combinations since Green starts with Kyrie and Luka. I'm not sure why you are worried so much.
Kidd will continue doing what he's been doing now. He'll juggle Hardy and THJ in all of that, depends who plays better.
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM Forums mobile app
Exum has still played more games than max. player Kyrie.
ejs78 wrote:Bob8 wrote:ejs78 wrote:
What wing do you suggest they sign?
I would go with someone, who was waived recently, knowing how those players are appreciated by Mavs' fans.
So someone whos old and washed.
Got it
ejs78 wrote:Bob8 wrote:ejs78 wrote:Exum is also out again tomorrow. Cinderella story ended on him about a month ago when he turned back into Exum.
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM Forums mobile app
Exum has still played more games than max. player Kyrie.
Your a prime example of minimum players getting privilege....you havent said Exums injury is fake once.