New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,542
- And1: 550
- Joined: Aug 27, 2008
New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
Which duo would you rather build around in todays league?
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
- PaulieWal
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 13,908
- And1: 16,218
- Joined: Aug 28, 2013
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
I have come to loathe Draymond lately but don't see the argument here for Stockton/KD.
JordansBulls wrote:The Warriors are basically a good college team until they meet a team with bigs in the NBA.
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,730
- And1: 9,228
- Joined: Sep 26, 2017
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
I think you have to go Curry and Dray for the proven fit and how dominant they are during their championship window even though Stockton and Durant have more overall value in terms of what they each provide to a typical roster. Stockton would be nasty shooting a high volume from three. You know he’d be taking like 7 or 8 threes a game.
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,850
- And1: 11,358
- Joined: Jun 13, 2017
-
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
Steph/Dray is too proven to go against them here imo. More so in today's league it shouldn't take as long to unlock them the way it actually did. Stockton+KD would obviously work too but with KD I always question how a team will function with his personality. Not sure they would actually get over the hump from just being contenders on a team that wins around 55-60 games every year without adding another top 20 guy to the mix.
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,762
- And1: 1,464
- Joined: Dec 23, 2023
- Location: Clearwater, FL
-
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
Durant with a distributor like Stockton? Easy win for that duo. Curry can do a lot offensively, but Mr. Triple Single will hold him back.
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
- TheGOATRises007
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,463
- And1: 20,130
- Joined: Oct 05, 2013
-
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
SportsGuru08 wrote:Durant with a distributor like Stockton? Easy win for that duo. Curry can do a lot offensively, but Mr. Triple Single will hold him back.
You say this like we haven't seen them win 4 titles together

Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 228
- And1: 250
- Joined: Aug 08, 2011
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
I have to take the proven option. Also, I like that Curry/Draymond gives you an elite anchor on each end of the floor.
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
-
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 91,908
- And1: 31,527
- Joined: Oct 14, 2003
-
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
iggymcfrack wrote:Stockton would be nasty shooting a high volume from three. You know he’d be taking like 7 or 8 threes a game.
That actually seems unlikely. One of the major detracting points about him was how hesitant he was to elevate his shooting volume; assuming he'd immediately overcome a non-era-related issue of that sort in this context doesn't make any sense to me.
They'd be a good pairing, of course, given KD's ability to play off-ball and so forth. He'd probably look similar to how he did as a Warrior. Can you imagine them just spamming THAT PnR? Blech, that'd be awful to defend.
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
-
- Junior
- Posts: 474
- And1: 340
- Joined: Feb 19, 2022
-
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
I'm going Stockton and Durant, I think that combo is better balanced. My concerns around Durant's personality issues fly out the window when he has Stockton to help keep him in check. Draymond isn't just quite as good as the other three, and Steph, while the best player in the comparison, doesn't have a huge lead over Stockton's value
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
-
- Junior
- Posts: 492
- And1: 577
- Joined: Dec 03, 2023
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
Stockton would be shooting a lot more threes today. At the same time, more than anybody he'd understand the importance of feeding Durant.
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,762
- And1: 1,464
- Joined: Dec 23, 2023
- Location: Clearwater, FL
-
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
TheGOATRises007 wrote:SportsGuru08 wrote:Durant with a distributor like Stockton? Easy win for that duo. Curry can do a lot offensively, but Mr. Triple Single will hold him back.
You say this like we haven't seen them win 4 titles together
You say this as if the Warriors duo was Curry and Draymond. It wasn't. Draymond was like the 5th or 6th most important player and was lucky to be surrounded by generational shooters and scorers. They won their most recent title in spite of Draymond; dude had more turnovers than field goals in the Finals.
Put Draymond on the Pistons or Magic for all those years. Then let's see how he does.
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
- TheGOATRises007
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,463
- And1: 20,130
- Joined: Oct 05, 2013
-
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
SportsGuru08 wrote:TheGOATRises007 wrote:SportsGuru08 wrote:Durant with a distributor like Stockton? Easy win for that duo. Curry can do a lot offensively, but Mr. Triple Single will hold him back.
You say this like we haven't seen them win 4 titles together
You say this as if the Warriors duo was Curry and Draymond. It wasn't. Draymond was like the 5th or 6th most important player and was lucky to be surrounded by generational shooters and scorers. They won their most recent title in spite of Draymond; dude had more turnovers than field goals in the Finals.
Put Draymond on the Pistons or Magic for all those years. Then let's see how he does.
You need to follow a different sport if you think Draymond was only the 5th or 6th most important player.
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,762
- And1: 1,464
- Joined: Dec 23, 2023
- Location: Clearwater, FL
-
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
TheGOATRises007 wrote:SportsGuru08 wrote:TheGOATRises007 wrote:
You say this like we haven't seen them win 4 titles together
You say this as if the Warriors duo was Curry and Draymond. It wasn't. Draymond was like the 5th or 6th most important player and was lucky to be surrounded by generational shooters and scorers. They won their most recent title in spite of Draymond; dude had more turnovers than field goals in the Finals.
Put Draymond on the Pistons or Magic for all those years. Then let's see how he does.
You need to follow a different sport if you think Draymond was only the 5th or 6th most important player.
2020 proved how overrated Draymond is.
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
- LA Bird
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,605
- And1: 3,364
- Joined: Feb 16, 2015
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
SportsGuru08 wrote:You say this as if the Warriors duo was Curry and Draymond. It wasn't.
Except it was. Durant was only there for 3 years and in the other 7 seasons,
Curry + Dray - Klay lineups are +8.93 net
Curry + Klay - Dray lineups are -0.84 net
But Klay's PPG, you say. Scorers are a dime and a dozen in the NBA. Warriors are great because of their team dominance and that only happened with the Curry/Dray duo, not the Curry/Klay duo.
Draymond was like the 5th or 6th most important player and was lucky to be surrounded by generational shooters and scorers.
6th? Who is even 4 and 5? Old Iguodala and Livingston? Talk about being a generational hater.
They won their most recent title in spite of Draymond; dude had more turnovers than field goals in the Finals.
Ah yes, the well-known FG to turnover ratio which we use everyday to evaluate players, especially someone whose biggest contribution is not scoring. Very useful indeed.
Put Draymond on the Pistons or Magic for all those years. Then let's see how he does.
Thread title: Curry/Draymond
You: But what if Draymond didn't play with Curry

Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,130
- And1: 5,974
- Joined: Jul 24, 2022
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
Durant had “Mr. Triple Double” and could not pull off a win against Curry and Draymond; there is something to be said for length and consistency of a prime/career, and for possibilities where Harden was kept / some other superstar scorer is added, but on his own, that is not an improvement.
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
- homecourtloss
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,366
- And1: 18,766
- Joined: Dec 29, 2012
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
SportsGuru08 wrote:TheGOATRises007 wrote:SportsGuru08 wrote:Durant with a distributor like Stockton? Easy win for that duo. Curry can do a lot offensively, but Mr. Triple Single will hold him back.
You say this like we haven't seen them win 4 titles together
You say this as if the Warriors duo was Curry and Draymond. It wasn't. Draymond was like the 5th or 6th most important player and was lucky to be surrounded by generational shooters and scorers. They won their most recent title in spite of Draymond; dude had more turnovers than field goals in the Finals.
Put Draymond on the Pistons or Magic for all those years. Then let's see how he does.
I’m beginning to think this is a satirical account that sets up puffballs for people to knock down. At least I hope it is.
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.
lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,762
- And1: 1,464
- Joined: Dec 23, 2023
- Location: Clearwater, FL
-
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
LA Bird wrote:SportsGuru08 wrote:You say this as if the Warriors duo was Curry and Draymond. It wasn't.
Except it was. Durant was only there for 3 years and in the other 7 seasons,
Curry + Dray - Klay lineups are +8.93 net
Curry + Klay - Dray lineups are -0.84 net
But Klay's PPG, you say. Scorers are a dime and a dozen in the NBA. Warriors are great because of their team dominance and that only happened with the Curry/Dray duo, not the Curry/Klay duo.Draymond was like the 5th or 6th most important player and was lucky to be surrounded by generational shooters and scorers.
6th? Who is even 4 and 5? Old Iguodala and Livingston? Talk about being a generational hater.They won their most recent title in spite of Draymond; dude had more turnovers than field goals in the Finals.
Ah yes, the well-known FG to turnover ratio which we use everyday to evaluate players, especially someone whose biggest contribution is not scoring. Very useful indeed.Put Draymond on the Pistons or Magic for all those years. Then let's see how he does.
Thread title: Curry/Draymond
You: But what if Draymond didn't play with Curry
If Draymond was so important as you're claiming, the Warriors wouldn't have had the worst record in the conference in 2020.
That season exposed him for the coattail rider he truly is.
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,940
- And1: 5,525
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
Poor Durant, drawing the dud.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,712
- And1: 2,759
- Joined: Aug 25, 2005
- Location: Northern California
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
I will take Stockton, Curry, Klay, Iguodala, Durant, Draymond, Bogut and call it a team.
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
- FJS
- Senior Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 18,793
- And1: 2,162
- Joined: Sep 19, 2002
- Location: Barcelona, Spain
-
Re: New Team: Stockton/Durant or Curry/Draymond
You have to have more contest.
I mean, 2016 warriors probably will beat 2016 OKC with Stockton instead of RW (or maybe not as RW was terrible in FG%).
But if you put Stockton and Durant in 2016 instead Curry and Dray, and Dray and Curry in 2016 OKC instead of RW and Durant, I would be for Stockton-KD team.
I mean, 2016 warriors probably will beat 2016 OKC with Stockton instead of RW (or maybe not as RW was terrible in FG%).
But if you put Stockton and Durant in 2016 instead Curry and Dray, and Dray and Curry in 2016 OKC instead of RW and Durant, I would be for Stockton-KD team.
