ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,142
And1: 17,647
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#21 » by babyjax13 » Sat Feb 17, 2024 11:23 pm

MessiahUjiri wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:
MessiahUjiri wrote:

Quickley and DJmurray can play together at the 1 and 2. The point is to also add a POA defender, so that Scottie can be more of a roamer and help defender.

I get your question, but this is different than the Hawks situation. Unlike Trae, Quickley has shown that he can also thrive in an offball shooter role.

The lineup would look something like this:


Quickley / (Murray & Scottie)
DJMurray / Trent / Ochai
Barrett / Gradey / Nwora?
Scottie / (JSmith? via MLE)
Poeltl / Olynyk


Add #17 pick
Add a PF at the MLE (eg JSmith from Indy?)
Trade Boucher for spare parts



The Raps aren’t winning the championship in the next couple of years, so young talent accumulation is the name of the game.

That’s 4 guys who can score 20 points. If you bank on Scottie’s growth into All NBA caliber, this is a respectable young core with lots of future flexibility.

Playing Murray next to another small guard is just replicating a formula that didn't work. That is a perennial 35 win team.



Quickley and Trae are not the same. This is such a wrong statement. Quickley is taller, heavier, and lengthier than Trae.

Quickley is >25 lb heavier than Trae, with a wingspan of 6’8. He can switch on to most 2 guards in this league.

More importantly, Quickley is actually willing to put in physical work, unlike Trae.

A 6-8 wingspan is nice, it doesn't mean that you aren't creating a small backcourt with two guards who should have their hands. Plus RJ needs the ball, and so does Scottie. It woupd be atrocious teambuilding.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
MessiahUjiri
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,938
And1: 4,528
Joined: Dec 16, 2014
Contact:

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#22 » by MessiahUjiri » Sun Feb 18, 2024 3:56 am

babyjax13 wrote:
MessiahUjiri wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:Playing Murray next to another small guard is just replicating a formula that didn't work. That is a perennial 35 win team.



Quickley and Trae are not the same. This is such a wrong statement. Quickley is taller, heavier, and lengthier than Trae.

Quickley is >25 lb heavier than Trae, with a wingspan of 6’8. He can switch on to most 2 guards in this league.

More importantly, Quickley is actually willing to put in physical work, unlike Trae.

A 6-8 wingspan is nice, it doesn't mean that you aren't creating a small backcourt with two guards who should have their hands. Plus RJ needs the ball, and so does Scottie. It woupd be atrocious teambuilding.



Did you just change your whole argument after you got proven wrong? :lol:


Murray’s wingspan is 6’9.5. Quickley is 6’8. That is not a “small” backcourt. It might be average.

Do you complain about Jrue Holiday and Derrick White being a small backcourt?
Do you complain about Mike Conley and Ant Edwards being a small backcourt?
Those are the top seeds in the NBA right now.

Just because Trae and Murray hasn’t worked out, it’s tainted your opinion.


Also, with regards to your other point. Raptors clearly need another scorer next to Scottie/Barrett/Quickley. Which is where Murray fits in. I agree that Barrett will need to learn to be off the ball more.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,142
And1: 17,647
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#23 » by babyjax13 » Sun Feb 18, 2024 5:11 am

MessiahUjiri wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:
MessiahUjiri wrote:

Quickley and Trae are not the same. This is such a wrong statement. Quickley is taller, heavier, and lengthier than Trae.

Quickley is >25 lb heavier than Trae, with a wingspan of 6’8. He can switch on to most 2 guards in this league.

More importantly, Quickley is actually willing to put in physical work, unlike Trae.

A 6-8 wingspan is nice, it doesn't mean that you aren't creating a small backcourt with two guards who should have their hands. Plus RJ needs the ball, and so does Scottie. It woupd be atrocious teambuilding.



Did you just change your whole argument after you got proven wrong? :lol:


Murray’s wingspan is 6’9.5. Quickley is 6’8. That is not a “small” backcourt. It might be average.

Do you complain about Jrue Holiday and Derrick White being a small backcourt?
Do you complain about Mike Conley and Ant Edwards being a small backcourt?
Those are the top seeds in the NBA right now.

Just because Trae and Murray hasn’t worked out, it’s tainted your opinion.


Also, with regards to your other point. Raptors clearly need another scorer next to Scottie/Barrett/Quickley. Which is where Murray fits in. I agree that Barrett will need to learn to be off the ball more.

Donovan Mitchell's wingspan is 6-10, we still had an undersized backcourt. I didn't change my argument at all.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
TorontoBarneys
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,898
And1: 7,038
Joined: Dec 30, 2022
   

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#24 » by TorontoBarneys » Sun Feb 18, 2024 4:46 pm

I really don't think Murray is a good fit in Toronto. At all.
louc1970
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,505
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#25 » by louc1970 » Sun Feb 18, 2024 5:03 pm

MessiahUjiri wrote:Let’s


#6, #31, Bruce Brown
for
Dejounte Murray


.

My initial reaction is can Murray and Quickley play together. Then I answer yes.
Next question is: is Murray at 28 years old worth a top 6 pick? Probably depending on what Toronto’s plans are.
Toronto is going to need a PF if Barnes is the 2G or SF, or a center if Barnes is the PF.
Players in that 5-10 range that fit are Buzelis, Holland, Filipowski. Are either of them more desirable than Murray?
louc1970
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,505
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#26 » by louc1970 » Sun Feb 18, 2024 5:15 pm

Mavrelous wrote:I have this as overpay by the Raps, but not egregious enough to deter them from pulling the trigger if they like DJM.

If it is an overpay, what would be the equalizer- adding Bufkin, Griffin or Fernando? Maybe second round picks going to Toronto?
louc1970
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,505
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#27 » by louc1970 » Sun Feb 18, 2024 5:29 pm

Would Toronto, if the ideal situation is getting Murray, be better off trading Barrett for Murray? Keeping the pick to get young player?
dms269
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 8,746
And1: 1,727
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
     

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#28 » by dms269 » Sun Feb 18, 2024 5:53 pm

louc1970 wrote:Would Toronto, if the ideal situation is getting Murray, be better off trading Barrett for Murray? Keeping the pick to get young player?


Atlanta wouldn't consider swapping Murray for Barrett.
The moderator formerly known as uga_dawgs24
Mr Swagtastic
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,959
And1: 3,419
Joined: Dec 29, 2005
Location: Jurassic Park
         

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#29 » by Mr Swagtastic » Mon Feb 19, 2024 1:16 am

I don't like the direction for Toronto. Murray is good but he isn't what this team needs. We go from a very bad team to a slightly bad team that makes the play in tournament. I rather take Buzelis or Holland or Cody Williams and continue the rebuild through next year
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry
PistolPeteJR
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 10,382
Joined: Jun 14, 2017
 

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#30 » by PistolPeteJR » Mon Feb 19, 2024 1:51 am

babyjax13 wrote:What was the point of trading for Quickley if they just do this?


100% this. I pass on this if I’m Toronto.
ConSarnit
Head Coach
Posts: 6,061
And1: 5,798
Joined: May 05, 2015
 

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#31 » by ConSarnit » Mon Feb 19, 2024 3:03 am

MessiahUjiri wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:
MessiahUjiri wrote:

Quickley and DJmurray can play together at the 1 and 2. The point is to also add a POA defender, so that Scottie can be more of a roamer and help defender.

I get your question, but this is different than the Hawks situation. Unlike Trae, Quickley has shown that he can also thrive in an offball shooter role.

The lineup would look something like this:


Quickley / (Murray & Scottie)
DJMurray / Trent / Ochai
Barrett / Gradey / Nwora?
Scottie / (JSmith? via MLE)
Poeltl / Olynyk


Add #17 pick
Add a PF at the MLE (eg JSmith from Indy?)
Trade Boucher for spare parts



The Raps aren’t winning the championship in the next couple of years, so young talent accumulation is the name of the game.

That’s 4 guys who can score 20 points. If you bank on Scottie’s growth into All NBA caliber, this is a respectable young core with lots of future flexibility.

Playing Murray next to another small guard is just replicating a formula that didn't work. That is a perennial 35 win team.



Quickley and Trae are not the same. This is such a wrong statement. Quickley is taller, heavier, and lengthier than Trae.

Quickley is >25 lb heavier than Trae, with a wingspan of 6’8. He can switch on to most 2 guards in this league.

More importantly, Quickley is actually willing to put in physical work, unlike Trae.


If Quickley could play the 2 full-time NYK wouldn't have traded him because his skillset pairs well with Brunson.

If Murray could effectively play the 2 full-time ATL wouldn't be in the spot they are currently in. Murray's defense has slipped and he isn't the guard stopper ATL hoped they were getting.

Now maybe both guys could cover more for each other because they would no longer be playing with Trae or Brunson but it's still not a great fit. Both guys are pg's and their flaws become larger if they are forced to play sg full-time. The Raptors need to be taking swings to get another clear all-star level player to pair with Barnes. That isn't Murray.
shakes0
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,434
And1: 5,047
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
Location: Chicago
       

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#32 » by shakes0 » Mon Feb 19, 2024 2:04 pm

MessiahUjiri wrote:Quickley and Trae are not the same. This is such a wrong statement. Quickley is taller, heavier, and lengthier than Trae.

Quickley is >25 lb heavier than Trae, with a wingspan of 6’8. He can switch on to most 2 guards in this league.

More importantly, Quickley is actually willing to put in physical work, unlike Trae.



oh yea, Is Quickely in the top 10 in the league in steals and charges drawn?


GTFO with this BS narrative.
MessiahUjiri
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,938
And1: 4,528
Joined: Dec 16, 2014
Contact:

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#33 » by MessiahUjiri » Mon Feb 19, 2024 2:38 pm

shakes0 wrote:
MessiahUjiri wrote:Quickley and Trae are not the same. This is such a wrong statement. Quickley is taller, heavier, and lengthier than Trae.

Quickley is >25 lb heavier than Trae, with a wingspan of 6’8. He can switch on to most 2 guards in this league.

More importantly, Quickley is actually willing to put in physical work, unlike Trae.



oh yea, Is Quickely in the top 10 in the league in steals and charges drawn?


GTFO with this BS narrative.



Are you going to refute the points in the post, or just act like a petulant child?
shakes0
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,434
And1: 5,047
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
Location: Chicago
       

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#34 » by shakes0 » Mon Feb 19, 2024 4:30 pm

MessiahUjiri wrote:
shakes0 wrote:
MessiahUjiri wrote:Quickley and Trae are not the same. This is such a wrong statement. Quickley is taller, heavier, and lengthier than Trae.

Quickley is >25 lb heavier than Trae, with a wingspan of 6’8. He can switch on to most 2 guards in this league.

More importantly, Quickley is actually willing to put in physical work, unlike Trae.



oh yea, Is Quickely in the top 10 in the league in steals and charges drawn?


GTFO with this BS narrative.



Are you going to refute the points in the post, or just act like a petulant child?


I just did. Unless you think that taking charges and getting steals don't count as "putting in physical work".


You know what else is physical? drawing fouls by seeking out and not avoiding contact while shooting. No one takes hits from players twice his size more than Trae. And no one refuses to shy away or back down from those situations more than Trae.

It's blatantly insulting and ignorant to say that Trae isn't "willing to put in physical work".


pound for pound, there isn't a single player in the NBA who is tougher than Trae Young.
MessiahUjiri
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,938
And1: 4,528
Joined: Dec 16, 2014
Contact:

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#35 » by MessiahUjiri » Mon Feb 19, 2024 6:06 pm

shakes0 wrote:
MessiahUjiri wrote:
shakes0 wrote:

oh yea, Is Quickely in the top 10 in the league in steals and charges drawn?


GTFO with this BS narrative.



Are you going to refute the points in the post, or just act like a petulant child?


I just did. Unless you think that taking charges and getting steals don't count as "putting in physical work".


You know what else is physical? drawing fouls by seeking out and not avoiding contact while shooting. No one takes hits from players twice his size more than Trae. And no one refuses to shy away or back down from those situations more than Trae.

It's blatantly insulting and ignorant to say that Trae isn't "willing to put in physical work".


pound for pound, there isn't a single player in the NBA who is tougher than Trae Young.



Ah, so you’re a Trae fan girl.


Trae weighs a petite 164 pounds. No wonder you tried making the “pound for pound” argument. Except in the real world, there are no bonus marks for being in a smaller weight class. Trae gets bodied on D and has to rely on gambling for steals. That explains your little “stat”.


Your argument was cute though. :lol:
shakes0
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,434
And1: 5,047
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
Location: Chicago
       

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#36 » by shakes0 » Mon Feb 19, 2024 6:12 pm

MessiahUjiri wrote:
shakes0 wrote:
MessiahUjiri wrote:

Are you going to refute the points in the post, or just act like a petulant child?


I just did. Unless you think that taking charges and getting steals don't count as "putting in physical work".


You know what else is physical? drawing fouls by seeking out and not avoiding contact while shooting. No one takes hits from players twice his size more than Trae. And no one refuses to shy away or back down from those situations more than Trae.

It's blatantly insulting and ignorant to say that Trae isn't "willing to put in physical work".


pound for pound, there isn't a single player in the NBA who is tougher than Trae Young.



Ah, so you’re a Trae fan girl.


Trae weighs a petite 164 pounds. No wonder you tried making the “pound for pound” argument. Except in the real world, there are no bonus marks for being in a smaller weight class. Trae gets bodied on D and has to rely on gambling for steals. That explains your little “stat”.


Your argument was cute though. :lol:



petite yet still top 10 in the league in charges drawn. Yet you say he isn't "willing to put in physical work".

And then you call me a girl while a few posts back you referred to me as a petulant child.


Maybe you need to look in a mirror before you try moving goal posts (ignoring the charges drawn) and acting like a child (calling me a fan girl).
Threezus
Veteran
Posts: 2,698
And1: 1,725
Joined: Jun 27, 2016
         

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#37 » by Threezus » Mon Feb 19, 2024 6:19 pm

MessiahUjiri wrote:
shakes0 wrote:
MessiahUjiri wrote:

Are you going to refute the points in the post, or just act like a petulant child?


I just did. Unless you think that taking charges and getting steals don't count as "putting in physical work".


You know what else is physical? drawing fouls by seeking out and not avoiding contact while shooting. No one takes hits from players twice his size more than Trae. And no one refuses to shy away or back down from those situations more than Trae.

It's blatantly insulting and ignorant to say that Trae isn't "willing to put in physical work".


pound for pound, there isn't a single player in the NBA who is tougher than Trae Young.



Ah, so you’re a Trae fan girl.


Trae weighs a petite 164 pounds. No wonder you tried making the “pound for pound” argument. Except in the real world, there are no bonus marks for being in a smaller weight class. Trae gets bodied on D and has to rely on gambling for steals. That explains your little “stat”.


Your argument was cute though. :lol:


So their are 2 sides to this his side where he is a bit of a homer of Trae as i don't agree with his pound for pound take. But also your side where you refuse to ever give Trae his credit where credit is do no matter what work he ever puts in or improves at.

Trae isn't as good a defender as Quickley is because as you said Quickley is bigger and longer that will never change. But on the other hand you absolutely can't discredit the improvement trae has done this year on defense. You can't be top 10 in charges and be soft or not put in the physical work thats literally one of the most physical things you can do on defense is take a defenseless charge lol.

I just can't ever understand why some people get things stuck in their head from years past and never believe a player can upgrade or change themselves. It's not just you that does it but quite a few people. Like alot of people said KAT couldn't play a lick of defense and that was me included but this year just like Trae he is proving he can and has taken a step to bettering himself on that. The better and more intelligent fans learn year by year and don't get stuck on things of the past because they just don't like someone. But will learn to reevaluate players yearly and see what they are improving on. Trae who imo was worst in the league on defense 3 years ago has improved every year and under Quinn has improved 10 fold to a below avg to avg defender instead of woat and 100% is m,ore active on that end being pesky which the top 10 in steals and charges proves.
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,524
And1: 6,861
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#38 » by Andre Roberstan » Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:31 pm

shakes0 wrote:
MessiahUjiri wrote:
shakes0 wrote:
I just did. Unless you think that taking charges and getting steals don't count as "putting in physical work".


You know what else is physical? drawing fouls by seeking out and not avoiding contact while shooting. No one takes hits from players twice his size more than Trae. And no one refuses to shy away or back down from those situations more than Trae.

It's blatantly insulting and ignorant to say that Trae isn't "willing to put in physical work".


pound for pound, there isn't a single player in the NBA who is tougher than Trae Young.



Ah, so you’re a Trae fan girl.


Trae weighs a petite 164 pounds. No wonder you tried making the “pound for pound” argument. Except in the real world, there are no bonus marks for being in a smaller weight class. Trae gets bodied on D and has to rely on gambling for steals. That explains your little “stat”.


Your argument was cute though. :lol:



petite yet still top 10 in the league in charges drawn. Yet you say he isn't "willing to put in physical work".

And then you call me a girl while a few posts back you referred to me as a petulant child.


Maybe you need to look in a mirror before you try moving goal posts (ignoring the charges drawn) and acting like a child (calling me a fan girl).


I need both of y'all to take about three steps back and stop escalating. This helps no one. Stop with the personal attacks. This is your one and only informal warning.
Image
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,481
And1: 98,472
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: ATL - TOR: DJMurray for #6, #31, BBrown 

Post#39 » by Texas Chuck » Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:11 pm

MessiahUjiri wrote:Ah, so you’re a Trae fan girl.


Just so we are clear, misogyny of this kind will always be a formal warning on this board in the future. Do not take this approach again. You are lucky this time that there was so much petty nonsense that Andre missed this. This is an inclusive board and always will be.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.

Return to Trades and Transactions