JMAC3 wrote:HadAnEffectHere wrote:FarBeyondDriven wrote:
Evan Mobley is a career 25% shooter from three. What's your point? With both Mobley and Sarr it's on low volume and small sample sizes. It's just not party of most centers repertoires tbh. There's only a handful in the NBA that shoot at a good clip on volume. Nobody is saying Sarr is an elite prospect that would go #1 in most drafts. But he's in that next class, with the likes of Evan Mobley. Guys that will be well above average starters and difference makers. He's still just 18 y/o
Evan Mobley has been a massive disappointment in the NBA and is yet to be a valuable player because he can't shoot so IDK.
Sarr is just Nic Claxton if he can't shoot. Is Nic Claxton a slamdunk #1 pick guy.
Mobley has been a top 10 defensive player and is above average on offense, idk if that is a massive disappointment.
If Sarr was going to reach that level in this draft class he would be the #1 pick 9/10 times.
Mobley is not a top 25 PF in the NBA on offense and he suffocates the Cavs' spacing. He was the reason they got nuked last year by the Knicks.
Eventually he'll be good when he can bulk up to 240 pounds and play center, but this is taking forever.
Sarr's ceiling is lower than Mobley as well because Sarr is much worse at passing and ball handling.
A taller Evan Mobley who bulks up to 240 pounds but is worse at dribbling and passing is... Nic Claxton.
Who like... Nic Claxton isn't a very anticipated free agent at all? He'll probably get like 3/75? ... He's not viewed as very valuable in the NBA.
No one's like "oh man, team X is clearing out cap space for Nic Claxton, he's target #1"
Paul George is probably completely washed up and he's still viewed as a massively more valuable free agent.