Whopper_Sr wrote:2013 LeBron is the last player to win both MVP and FMVP. Will 2024 Jokic be the next one?
If he does he will be close to knocking on the top 10 all time lists. 3 MVPs 2 FMVPs and two chips back to back.
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
Whopper_Sr wrote:2013 LeBron is the last player to win both MVP and FMVP. Will 2024 Jokic be the next one?
Mrakar wrote:Whopper_Sr wrote:2013 LeBron is the last player to win both MVP and FMVP. Will 2024 Jokic be the next one?
He should have been the last one but we decided its too boring
AleksandarN wrote:Whopper_Sr wrote:2013 LeBron is the last player to win both MVP and FMVP. Will 2024 Jokic be the next one?
If he does he will be close to knocking on the top 10 all time lists. 3 MVPs 2 FMVPs and two chips back to back.
Handlez wrote:AleksandarN wrote:Handlez wrote:Luka is coming...
Where is he going?
To the MVP throne.
The Mavs are winning now.
AleksandarN wrote:Handlez wrote:AleksandarN wrote:Where is he going?
To the MVP throne.
The Mavs are winning now.
He hasn't been more impactful than Jokic sorry.
Yuri36 wrote:AleksandarN wrote:Handlez wrote:
To the MVP throne.
The Mavs are winning now.
He hasn't been more impactful than Jokic sorry.
MUCH more points scored, more assists, more steals, 9 less wins BUT overall with a far worse team around this especially if you consider pre-trade Mavs and all the major injuries they had (Kyrie in particular).
And spare me the advanced stats, Joker is a center while Luka is a guard, of course that he will always be a more efficient scorer just by the lesser degree of difficulty of the shots a center takes comparing to a guard.
~Regarding Denver Nuggets, May 2025hardenASG13 wrote:They are better than the teammates of SGA, Giannis, Luka, Brunson, Curry etc. so far.
mpoo_sin wrote:At least noone with a clear head is talking about SGA winning the MVP. He is not on the same level as Doncic or Jokic. More like 2 or 3 levels below.
12/3/2 in 30 minutes is just not acceptable for a MVP candidat.

CobraCommander wrote:Wolfgang630 wrote:Handlez wrote:
To the MVP throne.
The Mavs are winning now.
So are the nuggets. And now he’s shooting abysmal
Mavs in the playin and Jokic in first- kinda not really fair - SGA the betting second and Luka is kinda again a brides maid. Also you can love Luka but he still isn’t in the top 3 when Embiid plays - he still 4 or 5 considering if you like SGA or Luka more
The funny thing is SGA and Jokic might vote for Luka if they had a vote lol’
There is a ton of mutual respect at the top right now
B-easy wrote:mpoo_sin wrote:At least noone with a clear head is talking about SGA winning the MVP. He is not on the same level as Doncic or Jokic. More like 2 or 3 levels below.
12/3/2 in 30 minutes is just not acceptable for a MVP candidat.
SGA is definitely ahead of Luka. SGA doesn't have as many fanboys so not as many people talking about him.
Doctor MJ wrote:CobraCommander wrote:Wolfgang630 wrote:
So are the nuggets. And now he’s shooting abysmal
Mavs in the playin and Jokic in first- kinda not really fair - SGA the betting second and Luka is kinda again a brides maid. Also you can love Luka but he still isn’t in the top 3 when Embiid plays - he still 4 or 5 considering if you like SGA or Luka more
The funny thing is SGA and Jokic might vote for Luka if they had a vote lol’
There is a ton of mutual respect at the top right now
Yup, totally unfair. That whole way they decide who wins and loses games - counting every teammate rathe than just the star and those he assist to - really is biased against Luka's MVP candidacy. Just not sure if it's because voters hated Slovenia or Texas.
Yuri36 wrote:AleksandarN wrote:Handlez wrote:
To the MVP throne.
The Mavs are winning now.
He hasn't been more impactful than Jokic sorry.
MUCH more points scored, more assists, more steals, 9 less wins BUT overall with a far worse team around this especially if you consider pre-trade Mavs and all the major injuries they had (Kyrie in particular).
And spare me the advanced stats, Joker is a center while Luka is a guard, of course that he will always be a more efficient scorer just by the lesser degree of difficulty of the shots a center takes comparing to a guard.
dygaction wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:CobraCommander wrote:Mavs in the playin and Jokic in first- kinda not really fair - SGA the betting second and Luka is kinda again a brides maid. Also you can love Luka but he still isn’t in the top 3 when Embiid plays - he still 4 or 5 considering if you like SGA or Luka more
The funny thing is SGA and Jokic might vote for Luka if they had a vote lol’
There is a ton of mutual respect at the top right now
Either
Yup, totally unfair. That whole way they decide who wins and loses games - counting every teammate rathe than just the star and those he assist to - really is biased against Luka's MVP candidacy. Just not sure if it's because voters hated Slovenia or Texas.
Yup, and instead of just an imaginary healthy Embiid, you forgot a younger LeBron, a jumpier KD, a this-year Tatum with last year stats, and a Steph with his previous supporting cast... So top 10 is on the optimistic side
AleksandarN wrote:Yuri36 wrote:AleksandarN wrote:He hasn't been more impactful than Jokic sorry.
MUCH more points scored, more assists, more steals, 9 less wins BUT overall with a far worse team around this especially if you consider pre-trade Mavs and all the major injuries they had (Kyrie in particular).
And spare me the advanced stats, Joker is a center while Luka is a guard, of course that he will always be a more efficient scorer just by the lesser degree of difficulty of the shots a center takes comparing to a guard.
Luka with a higher usage rate with the ball stuck to hands twice as long. Jokic gets his team more involved than Luka does earlier in the shot clock. Plays better defense and commands his unit on both sides of floor by calling out plays and defensive strategies. So yes jokic has been more impactful. This is without using “advanced stats” which I could have used quite easily.
P.S. since you brought up Luka having more assists than Jokic Luka has more turnovers than Jokic by a larger margin compared to assists. Funny you didn’t bring that up.
CobraCommander wrote:dygaction wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:Either
Yup, totally unfair. That whole way they decide who wins and loses games - counting every teammate rathe than just the star and those he assist to - really is biased against Luka's MVP candidacy. Just not sure if it's because voters hated Slovenia or Texas.
Yup, and instead of just an imaginary healthy Embiid, you forgot a younger LeBron, a jumpier KD, a this-year Tatum with last year stats, and a Steph with his previous supporting cast... So top 10 is on the optimistic side
Either way - Luka isn’t the MVP or the best player on earth yet-
Luka is 25 - he will get his time at least one of these titles at some point . No one doubts this -
dygaction wrote:AleksandarN wrote:Yuri36 wrote:MUCH more points scored, more assists, more steals, 9 less wins BUT overall with a far worse team around this especially if you consider pre-trade Mavs and all the major injuries they had (Kyrie in particular).
And spare me the advanced stats, Joker is a center while Luka is a guard, of course that he will always be a more efficient scorer just by the lesser degree of difficulty of the shots a center takes comparing to a guard.
Luka with a higher usage rate with the ball stuck to hands twice as long. Jokic gets his team more involved than Luka does earlier in the shot clock. Plays better defense and commands his unit on both sides of floor by calling out plays and defensive strategies. So yes jokic has been more impactful. This is without using “advanced stats” which I could have used quite easily.
P.S. since you brought up Luka having more assists than Jokic Luka has more turnovers than Jokic by a larger margin compared to assists. Funny you didn’t bring that up.
to be fair, you cannot only looking at turnovers to assists when we are talking about a league leading 34ppg scorer. They have very comparable TOV%.
AleksandarN wrote:dygaction wrote:AleksandarN wrote:Luka with a higher usage rate with the ball stuck to hands twice as long. Jokic gets his team more involved than Luka does earlier in the shot clock. Plays better defense and commands his unit on both sides of floor by calling out plays and defensive strategies. So yes jokic has been more impactful. This is without using “advanced stats” which I could have used quite easily.
P.S. since you brought up Luka having more assists than Jokic Luka has more turnovers than Jokic by a larger margin compared to assists. Funny you didn’t bring that up.
to be fair, you cannot only looking at turnovers to assists when we are talking about a league leading 34ppg scorer. They have very comparable TOV%.
TOV% is an advanced stat which the person I was replying to doesn’t want advanced stats to be brought up. Also turnovers impact games. Less turnovers less possessions lost. You could say Luka has more turnovers because he is more ball dominant which then leads to my point on how Jokic is more impactful because Jokic gets his teammates more involved by holding on to the ball less.