dirkdiggler4177 wrote:OE_Thunder wrote:Tracymcgoaty wrote:Seriously wtf was SGA thinking there. Insanely low IQ. No timeouts left just make a good contest and live with the outcome.
Game 7 would have been crazy.
I mean he did get the ball first...
Sent from my SM-S928U using
RealGM mobile app
He then got a lot of arm and the player had yet to shoot the ball. The ref reviewed, the ref commentator said it was a foul and this forum said it was a foul.
You can't possible say this is not a foul because he first hit the ball with his hand.

If you are a fan of some team X (or just a hater of team Y who plays vs team X), and if there's a contact to a ball at all, you can always say "no way, it's not a foul, he touched the ball first", even if it is an obvious foul like this. Just change their jerseys, it would become "how this is not a foul?! you cant break someone's elbow just because you touched the ball !! ". It is always the same, same in NBA, same in Euroleague, same in European soccer. Not sure if sports fandom makes people really irrational, or we are indeed just a bunch of irrational people who watch sports to begin with...