jkvonny wrote:B-easy wrote:Celtics happy they don't have to play the Nuggets.
Or TWolves. They'd feast off those miss 3s (rebounds).
Like soft towns and trash Rudy gobert would stand a chance against the celtics
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
jkvonny wrote:B-easy wrote:Celtics happy they don't have to play the Nuggets.
Or TWolves. They'd feast off those miss 3s (rebounds).
tlee324 wrote:
Lebron made it to the finals with that cleveland team.
Bird would have won 4 rings with that team, in this weak ass era of basketball.
bigboi wrote:AussieCeltic wrote:This series is far from over. It’s only 1 game. While I feel a lot better than I did before game 1, if Mavs win game 2, there’s a lot of pressure on the Celtics heading back to Dallas.
This series is over. We are a flip floppy team at home. If we win Sunday, this is a sweep
B-easy wrote:Celtics happy they don't have to play the Nuggets.
tlee324 wrote:
Lebron made it to the finals with that cleveland team.
Bird would have won 4 rings with that team, in this weak ass era of basketball.
SuperDeluxe wrote:bigboi wrote:AussieCeltic wrote:This series is far from over. It’s only 1 game. While I feel a lot better than I did before game 1, if Mavs win game 2, there’s a lot of pressure on the Celtics heading back to Dallas.
This series is over. We are a flip floppy team at home. If we win Sunday, this is a sweep
Come on now. Let's be serious.
tlee324 wrote:
Lebron made it to the finals with that cleveland team.
Bird would have won 4 rings with that team, in this weak ass era of basketball.
bigboi wrote:jkvonny wrote:B-easy wrote:Celtics happy they don't have to play the Nuggets.
Or TWolves. They'd feast off those miss 3s (rebounds).
Like soft towns and trash Rudy gobert would stand a chance against the celtics
bigboi wrote:B-easy wrote:Celtics happy they don't have to play the Nuggets.
Why are we talking about the nuggets? They lost. Hypotheticals don’t matter
durden_tyler wrote:GrandTheftRondo wrote:CelticSooner wrote:Tatum learned two years ago what Edwards learned this season.
LeBron carrying teams for years and people loving it has got people obsessed with having one dude carry their team all season.
It’s absurd.
How can you watch that game and think Tatum simply has to score more???
He missed some shots but his unselfishness led to easy 3s for the Celtics all night.
Mavs don’t have a chance at defending that.
Generally casual fans just appreciate scoring. Surprised to see we still have a bunch of those on "hardcore" basketball forum like RealGM. Tatum played beautifully tonight, just made the right and non-flashy plays.
Yank3525 wrote:durden_tyler wrote:GrandTheftRondo wrote:LeBron carrying teams for years and people loving it has got people obsessed with having one dude carry their team all season.
It’s absurd.
How can you watch that game and think Tatum simply has to score more???
He missed some shots but his unselfishness led to easy 3s for the Celtics all night.
Mavs don’t have a chance at defending that.
Generally casual fans just appreciate scoring. Surprised to see we still have a bunch of those on "hardcore" basketball forum like RealGM. Tatum played beautifully tonight, just made the right and non-flashy plays.
![]()
Scoring isn't everything, but get real. Dude was mid as **** tonight.
Bourne85 wrote:GrandTheftRondo wrote:CelticSooner wrote:Tatum learned two years ago what Edwards learned this season.
LeBron carrying teams for years and people loving it has got people obsessed with having one dude carry their team all season.
It’s absurd.
How can you watch that game and think Tatum simply has to score more???
He missed some shots but his unselfishness led to easy 3s for the Celtics all night.
Mavs don’t have a chance at defending that.
You can disguise it however you like. Performing in the Finals matters. Especially for “superstar” players. 6-17 16 points isn’t gonna cut it. And 6 of those 16 came in garbage time when he was the only starter in the game. All the big time players get judged in the finals. That was a dud game from Tatum
bigboi wrote:SuperDeluxe wrote:bigboi wrote:
This series is over. We are a flip floppy team at home. If we win Sunday, this is a sweep
Come on now. Let's be serious.
I’ve been saying Celtics in 5 or less since like the second round. Mavs were never good. Timberwolves just had an awful offense. If Ant wasn’t so pitiful that series, Mavs wouldn’t have made it out
KamikazeK wrote:bigboi wrote:B-easy wrote:Celtics happy they don't have to play the Nuggets.
Why are we talking about the nuggets? They lost. Hypotheticals don’t matter
Nuggets have to win their conference before they can start talking about winning the Finals.
tlee324 wrote:
Lebron made it to the finals with that cleveland team.
Bird would have won 4 rings with that team, in this weak ass era of basketball.
jkvonny wrote:bigboi wrote:jkvonny wrote:Or TWolves. They'd feast off those miss 3s (rebounds).
Like soft towns and trash Rudy gobert would stand a chance against the celtics
Sure. But we'll never know. Will we?
I do know that the Mavs are probably cooked in this one. U agree?
Congrats on the NBA championship ( if yall dont choke again).
tlee324 wrote:
Lebron made it to the finals with that cleveland team.
Bird would have won 4 rings with that team, in this weak ass era of basketball.
Impuniti wrote:bigboi wrote:SuperDeluxe wrote:Come on now. Let's be serious.
I’ve been saying Celtics in 5 or less since like the second round. Mavs were never good. Timberwolves just had an awful offense. If Ant wasn’t so pitiful that series, Mavs wouldn’t have made it out
Ant isn't as good as people want him to be. They watched him terrorize the Suns interior defense and Jokic and jumped the gun.
tlee324 wrote:
Lebron made it to the finals with that cleveland team.
Bird would have won 4 rings with that team, in this weak ass era of basketball.
Statlanta wrote:I hate that the Mavs went from clowning Gobert to being scared of Porzingis.
Simply had no gameplan for him on offense or defense