Texas Chuck wrote:So I will pick any random free agent in the league and pay them what I have to for one year to get to the floor. Done. I'm better off. I don't have 2/$68M still sitting on my books and whatever player gets my boon will not be as destructive on the court as Poole.
The Wizards already have about $20M in cap room next summer after factoring their picks this year and next year. Again, is it better to have Poole and $20M or no Poole and $50M? Sure, it's marginally better to have the cap room, but I don't think that cap room is going to have a significant impact on the outcome of the team. It's not really a big factor in terms of assessing the long term outlook of the Wizards relative to the Pistons, which is why we got off on this tangent.
When the Wizards really need cap room will be either in Summer 2026 or Summer 2027 when they're looking to add a good vet to the core of Bilal, Deni, 2024 lotto pick, 2025 lotto pick and 2026 lotto pick. In 2026, they could use Poole's expiring contract to trade for such a vet. Or they could wait until 2027 when hopefully they'll be winning some, at which point they'll be in a position similar to Orlando now: an up-and-coming team with max cap room.
The point is, the Wizards will have the salary flexibility when the time comes for them to actually try and attract difference-making free agents. Prior to that, the cap room is only buying them second round picks here and there; and they already have some cap room and some TPE's to make those kinds of transactions anyhow.
People need to get out of the mindset that existed under the previous CBA when there was no salary minimum threshold. There is no hoarding cap space anymore. If your team sucks so that you can't attract good free agents, you are stuck overpaying guys anyhow. So the opportunity cost of already having an overpaid guy is marginal.